Jump to content


Please note: You can easily log in to MPN using your Facebook account!

OT- Gibson guitars "raided"...


keyguy

Recommended Posts



  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The government spokesperson remarked that the black market for ebony wood is akin to the "Blood Diamond" atrocity of movie fame.

 

 

Of course, it's much harder to smuggle a plank of ebony up your ass.

Muzikteechur is Lonnie, in Kittery, Maine.

 

HS music teacher: Concert Band, Marching Band, Jazz Band, Chorus, Music Theory, AP Music Theory, History of Rock, Musical Theatre, Piano, Guitar, Drama.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really dangerous situation for those of us with "vintage" instruments (one of my previous fiddles was the vintage year of 1685 :laugh:). One must carry some pretty convincing documentation that the instrument is of a certain year. An overzealous (or crooked) customs official could take that classic Martin away and keep it.

 

This reminds me of various drug laws in states that let authorities keep your property, even if you are NOT convicted. The TSA agent is gonna touch your junk then take your axe. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

During the raid, agents found 200 unopened cases of Opcode Studio Vision.

Given that Gibson has "raided" and destroyed many great music-related companies- Opcode, Oberheim, Steinberger, etc., etc., etc., I am having difficulty generating any sympathy for them. :evil::evil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CEO is notorious for being, well frankly, a vile human being. His company was voted the #1 WORST company to work for in the known universe.

 

His takeover and scuttling of Oberheim and the MX product thru personal meddling, and subsequent persecution of the original developer (AND Don Buchla, brought in to rescue the project) is legendary.

 

linkie

 

Now he has almost ruined Gibson. May all bad things happen to him.

Moe

---

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I have read: Indian law specifies that "sawn wood" cannot be exported but that "veneer wood" can. Veneer is sawn wood that has been processed in India..it can then be exported. This is not about importing some endangered species of wood but about the definitions of the product. Gibson claims they have been importing the veneer figerboards for decades and that 2/3 of the finish work is done in India, 1/3 in the US...therefore the fingerboards quality as "veneer". No charges have been filed in this case..only search warrants have been served. I think the Justic Department might have some more important things to do than fool around with this case. Comments?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Justic Department might have some more important things to do than fool around with this case.

Agreed.

 

Many of the strange decisions made by Gibson are well-known in the industry, but I don't think that they're doing anything (morally) wrong regarding their wood importing. Maybe they're taking advantage of a legal loophole, or turning a blind eye towards some illegal harvesting activity, but it's hardly life-and-death stuff, and to my knowledge consumers aren't being defrauded by them.

 

That's about all I can say without breaking the politics rule by ranting further ... except to also say: STAND YOUR GROUND, GIBSON!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without taking a side, I will say that Gibson's reputation is widespread. If it is eventually proven that they knowingly sought to circumvent the content or the intent of the law in order to maximize profits, a lot of people around here will not be surprised. This is not their first skirmish, as noted above.

 

re: the 09 case:

The U.S. Justice Department won't comment about the case it's preparing, but a court motion filed in June asserts Gibson's Madagascar ebony was contraband. It quotes emails that seem to show Gibson taking steps to maintain a supply chain that's been connected to illegal timber harvests.

 

 

Andrea Johnson, director of forest programs for the Environmental Investigation Agency in Washington, says the Lacey Act requires end users of endangered wood to certify the legality of their supply chain all the way to the trees. EIA's independent investigations have concluded that Gibson knowingly imported tainted wood.

 

"Gibson clearly understood the risks involved," says Johnson. "Was on the ground in Madagascar getting a tour to understand whether they could possibly source illegally from that country. And made a decision in the end that they were going to source despite knowing that there was a ban on exports of ebony and rosewood."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Justic Department might have some more important things to do than fool around with this case.

Agreed.

 

Many of the strange decisions made by Gibson are well-known in the industry, but I don't think that they're doing anything (morally) wrong regarding their wood importing. Maybe they're taking advantage of a legal loophole, or turning a blind eye towards some illegal harvesting activity, but it's hardly life-and-death stuff, and to my knowledge consumers aren't being defrauded by them.

 

 

Lots of stuff isnt life and death, I'm not following the rationale here. When one get's that speeding ticket they weren't defrauding anyone either, but they man up and go pay the fee.

 

I happen to think some of the US drug laws are ridiculous. We, however, can't pick and choose laws to follow as we please without paying the piper if we break those laws. There's a CEO mentality here (with Gibson) that I'm objecting to, not the actual deed. I don't know enough about the subject to opine whether the law is wise or foolish, I just see a greedy CEO making up an imaginary witch hunt to avoid following laws at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post isn't political, it is about legalities.

 

a) it appears Gibson broke no US law* with this East Indian Rosewood and Indian ebony. It also appears this action was taken without the support and consent of the government in India.

b) it appears Gibson broke no US law* in 2009 with the Madagascar ebony. In fact, Gibson has obtained sworn statements and documents from the Madagascar government, and these documents, which have been filed in federal court, show that the wood seized in 2009 was legally exported under Madagascar law and that no law has been violated. Nearly two years later, no charges have been filed, yet the US government refuses to return the wood to Gibson. The Justice Department has asked the judge to stop the court case indefinitely.

 

So, while it's entirely possible that Gibson is lying, the US government's inaction and stalling following the 2009 raid is equally suspicious. Add to this the uncertainties inherent in dealing with an African regime, er, government, and the fact that the wood was purchased from Germany with the required "legal" documents**, I don't think we can yet determine who is right and who is wrong. My guess is there is enough blame to go around.

 

* The .gov is supposedly investigating whether the 100-year-old Lacey Act was violated.

** It is possible that Gibson has legal documents from Madagascar for the importation of ebony. The reality is that it is equally possible, given it is an African country, that whoever issued those documents had no legal right to do so. Or that it was wood that was illegally harvested, warehoused, then sold during periods when those wood exports were allowed (they periodically are). If that is the case, it's probably impossible to know for sure if that's what happened and prosecute because Gibson would have legal export papers from Madagascar. Doubtful anyone could determine that tree "A" was harvested one week before the ban was lifted and tree "B" was harvested one week after.

Estonia 190, Korg TrinityPlus, Yamaha P90, Roland PK-5a
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post isn't political, it is about legalities.

 

a) it appears Gibson broke no US law* with this East Indian Rosewood. It also appears this action was taken without the support and consent of the government in India.

b) it appears Gibson broke no US law* in 2009 with the Madagascar ebony. In fact, Gibson has obtained sworn statements and documents from the Madagascar government, and these documents, which have been filed in federal court, show that the wood seized in 2009 was legally exported under Madagascar law and that no law has been violated. Nearly two years later, no charges have been filed, yet the US government refuses to return the wood to Gibson. The Justice Department has asked the judge to stop the court case indefinitely.

 

So, while it's entirely possible that Gibson is lying, the US government's inaction and stalling following the 2009 raid is equally suspicious. Add to this the uncertainties inherent in dealing with an African regime, er, government, and the fact that the wood was purchased from Germany with the required "legal" documents**, I don't think we can yet determine who is right and who is wrong. My guess is there is enough blame to go around.

 

* The .gov is supposedly investigating whether the 100-year-old Lacey Act was violated.

** It is possible that Gibson has legal documents from Madagascar for the importation of ebony. The reality is that it is equally possible, given it is an African country, that whoever issued those documents had no legal right to do so.

 

I have no objection to any of this, it's probably complex and will take years to sort out. I'm not supporting "The Man" in any way. I just object to the CEO's handling of the situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regulating and protecting tropical hardwoods (and the ecosystems that produce them) is serious business with real, global consequences.

 

As far as I'm concerned, illegally obtaining tropical hardwoods isn't too much different from dumping your toxic waste into the river.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Press release from KMJ-AM in Fresno, California:

 

Tonight, in an interview on KMJs The Chris Daniel Show, Gibson CEO Henry Juszkiewicz confirmed that the US government wanted Gibson guitars to use foreign labor over American labor:

CHRIS DANIEL: Mr. Juszkiewicz, did an agent of the US government suggest to you that your problems would go away if you used Madagascar labor instead of American labor?

HENRY JUSZKIEWICZ: They actually wrote that in a [inaudible].

CHRIS DANIEL: Excuse me?

HENRY JUSKIEWICZ: They actually wrote that in a pleading.

CHRIS DANIEL: That your problems would go away if you used Madagascar labor instead of our labor?

HENRY JUSKIEWICZ: Yes"

aka âmisterdregsâ

 

Nord Electro 5D 73

Yamaha P105

Kurzweil PC3LE7

Motion Sound KP200S

Schimmel 6-10LE

QSC CP-12

Westone AM Pro 30 IEMs

Rolls PM55P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regulating and protecting tropical hardwoods (and the ecosystems that produce them) is serious business with real, global consequences.
In the case of the Indian ebony and rosewood for which they were recently raided, Gibson could import an entire shipload of the stuff legally. The issue is simply with the dimensional thickness of the wood, 10mm v. 6mm, about 3/8" (illegal) v. 1/4" (legal). India simply wants to keep more work in country sawing it up thinner before export. It has nothing at all to do with not harvesting a protected tropical hardwood.

 

There were several shipments. Some correctly labeled the wood 10mm, some incorrectly labeled it 6mm.

Estonia 190, Korg TrinityPlus, Yamaha P90, Roland PK-5a
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...