Jump to content
Please note: You can easily log in to MPN using your Facebook account!

The Reharm Room


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for sharing, nathan!

 

General thoughts to anyone: Recently I find myself a little conflicted on the concept of reharms, if it means a total revamping of a tune. Sure, nothing wrong with expressing a song in a new way when it's musical, and in jazz solos we explore a tune in a myriad of ways. And I'm all for stretching on a song, but when the song is someone else's, the head should be somewhat faithful to the original. Perhaps if I'd changed the term "reharm" to simply "arrangement" it may be more acceptable to take liberties - although I've done some arrangements, they've never been my focus.

 

Definitely there was a bit of semantics happening with the word "Reharm". Personally it always meant a bit more to me than just a few substitutions. But there is certainly a line where it becomes a "re-write" more than a reharm.

 

Interesting in Jazz- you have the contrafact- Bird does Ornithology on How High The Moon to name one of hundreds, and then the reharm- Trane does Body and Soul and sticks Giant Steps changes in the bridge.

 

SK- what do you think it is/what about something like 26-2? Trane reharms Confirmation but then writes his own head on top of the reharm anyway. I guess that's almost a "inspired by" type of situation.

 

My version Chelsea Bridge was about as obscure as I could ever get and it was on purpose since we were in a sort of "guess the tune" vibe for the week. Not my usual reharm and especially since I avoided the melody on purpose to keep the secret. I doubt I'd ever play that on a gig or record it like that, it was more just for 'lab' purposes, throwing ideas around in here. It would be fun for me to take the changes I did there and re-insert the melody as much as possible. I think it would sound cool back in context rather that deconstructed to the nth degree... Anyway, it was fun for me.

 

 

So all that talking aside, I do have a nice (recognizable lol) arrangement/reharm of What's New, I'll try to post it tomorrow.

 

Love this thread!!

(Talking music plus I get to hear SK and Dave Ferris and all these other great pianists play) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great version of "All of Me". But I have to agree with Dave in saying that it would probably be waaaaay too hip for the rooms I play in as well. The end sounds like something Monk would do, and it just made me smile. And thanks in advance for any feedback on the reharms Carlo.

 

Lucas brings up a good point...on which terms is a tune a "reharm" or an "arrangement"? I don't wanna get into an argument, but either way...if it makes the listener think, or inspires the musician...then it's doing a world of good! My two cents.

 

SK...thanks for the feedback on "Stars Fell..." and "Green Dolphin St." Where I'm from, the folks here think that "Stars Fell" is like the National Anthem or something. So I thought to myself...if they take this song so damn dramatic...why not make it so damn dramatic? That was the result. As far as the "nebulous" vibe for "Green Dolphin St", yeah...I was wanting to go for that 60's Miles Quintet / Herbie Hancock sound. Really outside, but you can still tell what the tune is. Hopefully, I achieved that. More than anything...thanks for listening and giving me feedback.

 

-Nathan

(ndhjazz)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nathan, your explanation of Stars makes sense.

 

Yeah lucas, when it comes to rewriting a tune, then it's a new tune. That's the way I look at Charlie Parker's and Coltrane's songs.

 

anything that helps get you away from "All Of Me" is helpful. :)

:D

 

 

On the other hand............. :evil: :evil:

 

:)

 

That version of All Of Me might support the point I was making. (And you call me 'mad'.) :grin: It would certainly be appropriate at a party I might throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, that was really something... I enjoyed it!

 

it's amazes me how on the first listening ones ear is so fresh.

 

the reharm got really nice in the lower register in I guess what would be about the 12 bar or so. ouch!

 

Ok, "What's New" reharm/subs etc. ;)

 

http://www.divshare.com/download/9008494-618

 CP-50, YC 73,  FP-80, PX5-S, NE-5d61, Kurzweil SP6, XK-3, CX-3, Hammond XK-3, Yamaha YUX Upright, '66 B3/Leslie 145/122

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty cool, lucas - a more ethereal What's New. Almost a subtle caricature - the character of the tune is still there, but you brought out a darker side of the original mood which compliments the piece.

 

Passing chords/subs come up naturally when we play a song - then we play into it. Expanded playing over that mood would sound nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty cool, lucas - a more ethereal What's New. Almost a subtle caricature - the character of the tune is still there, but you brought out a darker side of the original mood which compliments the piece.

Exactly. I envision this version sung with some kind of alternative lyrics... :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Nathan, I've listened to some of your reharms and I must say that I like your ideas and your enthusiasm.

"Blue Bossa" runs the border between "extreme bebop substitutions" and "totally free reharm", but I like how it always returns home. "Maiden Voyage" is more difficult because it doesn't have a fixed tonal center, but like most other of your reharms, should work well in a group context, with the rhythm section following the harmonic rhythm.

"Autumn Leaves" sounds quite nice, and again, I hear some sort of rhythmic arrangement behind it. "My Romance" has the nerve to make fun of Bill Evans, but with such grace and musicality that I'd say Bill is smiling and not getting angry!

Keep at it... the harmonic ear develops as you do more songs.

We could say, the more songs you harm, the more you will reharm. :D

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for listening and for the comments/compliments, guys! :)

 

It made me realize- it could be really funny to make the mood of a standard with ultra-happy lyrics into music totally opposite that and vice versa. Like playing some bi-polar tricks on the audience. ;)

 

 

Doing these can be a good practice tool (or I should say, "have been for me") in terms of 1) internalizing some new voicings I'm studying as well as 2) organically coming up with new ones while working a tune out.

 

Certainly always good to practice a voicing/concept/etc. in 12 keys but for my learning style it sticks better in context of a tune.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It made me realize- it could be really funny to make the mood of a standard with ultra-happy lyrics into music totally opposite that and vice versa. Like playing some bi-polar tricks on the audience. ;)

Oh yeah. Vice versa: Round Midnight in a major key (although the tune doesn't deserve parody.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although this isn't quite what you guys are talking about, since a few days I have the idea of somehow getting hold of a top notch big band/jazz orchestra, a singer who sounds absolutely like Sinatra, then arrange "I thought about you" in show big band style and, after a long expectation-building intro, let the singer sing lines like "I shaved my armpit today, and I thought about you".

Just watching the audience during the perfomance would be worth the work for me.

However, that's just me. :D

It's not a clone, it's a Suzuki.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok guys and girls,

here's my version of Burt Bacharach's "Alfie", which I had hoped to include in the latest KC comp. Unfortunately, only recently I've had the chance to record it with a real piano (Yamaha C3), then I've added a (very) fake double bass at home, courtesy of my K2600. It's in fact preset 41, "String Bass", unedited. :)

 

I hope that by listening to it, the reason why I didn't want to record it with a sampled piano will be clear. It's a rather intimate version, suitable for an Evans-type piano trio.

The timing of the bass is a bit out in spots, 'cause I've played the piano part rather freely, so overdubbing with perfect sync was a challenge.

 

Also, about the recent discussion about just *why* to reharm perfectly good songs... :D Well, in my case, I see it as an art in itself, like composing, arranging, or improvising. When you do it for a long time, you reach a level where you don't think about the technique anymore; you have a certain vision of the song, and you simply do your best to get it to the audience, and to convey a certain atmosphere that you have in mind.

 

Alfie

 

There's a little intro, but it should be very clear where the theme begins. Enjoy.

 

Edit: I've noticed that in my little computer system, the bass is almost inaudible... (on the system where I mixed, if was loud and clear)

Can you hear the bass? If not, I could remix it with more bass in it. The bass is quite important to anchor the voicings.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very pretty, Carlo. It draws out the quality of the song in different ways but still in an organic way. Nice. :thu:

 

I could hear the bass fine - it added nicely to the music, but a little fuller bass sound would be even better.

Also, about the recent discussion about just *why* to reharm perfectly good songs... :D Well, in my case, I see it as an art in itself, like composing, arranging, or improvising. When you do it for a long time, you reach a level where you don't think about the technique anymore; you have a certain vision of the song, and you simply do your best to get it to the audience, and to convey a certain atmosphere that you have in mind.

What you describe is the way I think of playing in general, if we throw out all the approach terms like reharm/arranging/writing. It's about the music we make, nothing else. In that broad sense, I agree.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, here is a new mix of "Alfie" with a little more bass on it. The link in the original post has been updated as well. The harmony should sound clearer now.

 

I could hear the bass fine - it added nicely to the music, but a little fuller bass sound would be even better.

Well, that's not possible since I've recorded the bass to an audio track, no MIDI involved... I would have to play another whole bass track, and the first one was tricky enough, with all the free-floating piano playing! :)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds a little better - it's very nice.

 

Nice nebulous key center with the Bbmaj.7#11 chord at the top, and I love that simple Gm, C sus effect going to the Fmaj7 (after the Gb half diminished, 7#11 or whatever you want to call it to the B.) You freshened the tune up, which was no small feat for a tune that was already nice.

 

Thanks for the grins on the silly "Part Of Me". It was only deserving of one grin icon at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve; once again, you've nailed those changes very well. As I wrote it, that section looks like this:

 

| F#m7b5 B7 | Gm7 C7sus C7 | Fmaj7 Bbmaj7 | Bm7 E7 |

| Fmaj7 Bbmaj7 | F#m7 B7 |

 

That's the first ending, for coming back to the beginning of the A section.

 

Edit: Ooops! I forgot the last two bars.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys. Sorry I haven't been active lately. I've been fighting off the flu throughout the whole weekend until yesterday. I need to go back and catch up on some of your reharms. Here's a reharm I did of "Imagine" (not even close to Vijay Iyer's) but I'm kinda torn on it. Some parts I like, and some I'm not crazy about. So, I'll put it up for public scrutiny, and see what you guys think.

 

http://www.divshare.com/download/9073989-8c8

 

Thanks,

-Nathan

(ndhjazz)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...