Jump to content


rickzjamm

Member
  • Posts

    982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rickzjamm

  1. Thanks ChazKeys for the tips, still not happening for me but never say never. :)

    The more I play the YC88 the more it reminds me of one my favorite hammer actions on a DP... the RD800. I find myself being inspired by this board just by the action alone, this is a great utility gigging tool & digging deeper...

  2. The YC88 hammer action isn't too heavy (you can adjust to taste) so to play organ isn't really an issue if it's mainly for cover band duties which meets my needs. Now if you're looking for a more "waterfall organ" action experience where organ plays a more central role then yes it's not the right board for organ ( FWIW, I sold my NS3 HA76 to get the YC88, for me it was the right move).
  3. I agree, it may be years before we see some Basic modifications like adding an extra layer option or it could be in the next OS in a few months⦠who knows. I really do enjoy the sounds on the YC88 and the keyboard action and I"ll admit the Hammond definitely looks tempting, possibly as a second-tier?
  4. I have been playing the YC 88 over A couple of weeks now and I"m really enjoying the sounds on it, of course for the organ purist there can be some modifications to make the organ stand out a little more realistically but that"s being very picky. The Hammond SK pro I think has it right on a couple of areas which if the YC picked up on could definitely be the leader of the pack. The Hammond has four layers and splits anywhere on the board. More specifically adding an extra third layer to the non-Organ section will really improve the system.
  5. The action is just what I wanted not too heavy but not too light. I also have a Roland RD2000 that I use for practicing at home (too heavy for gigging ) and it reminds me of that. Owned the Nord Stage 3 88 A couple of years ago and to me it"s not a true hammer action. It"s all subjective but for me the action on the YC 88 feels like an old friend.
  6. General assessment... gigged with the YC88 last night for the first time & it exceeded my expectations! AP's & EPs sit nicely in a mix and stand out as needed, the strings & brass worked good after some tweaking. Of course the organ was great in the band mix which surprised me because I really wasn't all that impressed with it by itself. The Soundman was pouring on the compliments on how good the new keyboard sounded!

    I've been using the Korg Kronos 7, great sounds but a hefty 47lbs. became a pain to schlep to gigs. Plus the onboard sequencer is too much for my needs in a cover band. Then I was using the Nord Stage 3 HA 76, good sounds but still not quite what I craved & the hammer action was blah.

    The YC88 checked all the boxes for me, not perfect (what is?) but at 40 lbs. it's a powerful well thought out board. Was looking for something lightweight yet high end gigging sounds to replace the NS3 HA76...

    I found it IMHO. ;-)

    • Like 1
  7. Get the RD-2000.

    I'm the music director at my church playing eight to ten masses on the weekend and that number increases significantly when you add weddings, funerals, etc. We had a Boston Grand & I loved it but it went out of tune regularly with the workload so when the finance council agreed to get a digital board I got the Roland RD-2000 in a piano shell, not crazy expensive & the hammer action is good.

  8. To be fair ( my observation), Yamaha does some amazing things with APs, EPs,... I'm a huge fan of all their products especially the stage pianos. I wouldn't expect any board to do everything, the weight alone would need a fork lift for every gig.

    I'm happy with my CP88 except the organ, maybe a future update for that is on the horizon... IMHO.

×
×
  • Create New...