Jump to content


Please note: You can easily log in to MPN using your Facebook account!

Scale preference?


73 P Bass

Recommended Posts



  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

My big disadvantage is that I never learned to play guitar, so the whole "guitar fingering" concept is completely alien.

 

Still refusing to give up on the whole "retro" concept, so when the dust settles a little here (as if dust ever settles in Eastern Washington), I may make a couple of purchases at Warmoth and try to cop some technical data. I'm sure I am not going to get away with something as simple as copping the "V" body and sticking a 34" scale neck on the thing.

 

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34" on the Electra MPC (O'Keefe,) 32.5 on the Rogue A/E (Marie,) and it's been a while since I've been on an upright so I don't recall that scale.

 

Never had a problem jumping from one to the other, but I do remember ending up with the upright on my knee a couple of times. ;)

 

ATM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Originally posted by 73 P Bass:

After 2 months, I don't like the 35" scale, no sir don't like it at all.

Fortunately I never paid for it and can give it back.

But you don't say why? I can agree with tatudbassman to the extent that the 35" scale with the low B helps keep that string from getting muddy in some cases and would probably go that route of I decided to make a 5 string.

 

And yes, there are perfectly good 5 string with 34" scales that sound just great on the bottom, but since I do not have the years of experience and staff of engineers and artisans, I would take the cheap way out and go 35" for a 5 string.

 

Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Rogue HR is 34 and very comfy. The new Peavey is 35 and to be honest, the only difference I noticed was the fact that my usual strings are a we bit too short.

 

The new M.Kelly A/E 5 will also be 35". Looking foreward to that.

"He is to music what Stevie Wonder is to photography." getz76

 

I have nothing nice to say so . . .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Social Critic:

[/qb]

But you don't say why?

[/QB]

Why what? Why I don't like it? Because when I'd switch to one of my 34" scale basses there would be an awkward readjustment period to the size difference.

Why I never paid for it and can give it back? it's a demo.

"Start listening to music!".

-Jeremy C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 5's are 35", my 4's (and the fretless)are 34".

 

I only use the 5's with one band, so there's a 'familiarity' in context.

 

(I'd be screwed if I brought the 5 to a 4 gig. I need to work on that!)

 

On the other hand - my "BenLoy" has the 'D-Tuner'. I might be able to slide on that one.

 

Jim

Jim

Confirmed RoscoeHead

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only sort of scale I've found I disliked is short scale. My Ric 4003 is 43 & change, & feels great. But I tried an Epiphone Woody bass, & while it seemed like a fine instrument, I just could not stand that short-scaled neck.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a short scale fan.

 

34" for me, usually, although I have played a few 35"s I liked. Shecky's Kinal felt odd at first, but I came around after a bit.

 

Peace,

 

wraub

 

I'm a lot more like I am now than I was when I got here.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...