OT: Should We Impeach Bush Or Just Jail Him?

[alcohol]

I think it's clear that Bush should be impeached. Time to start a movement to get our representatives going on this. I think there is an impeachment movement already going. I'll look into it and pass on the information. It's pretty clear that the primary motivation for invading Iraq was to get Republicans elected. All the other arguments don't hold up. [url=http://futon.multifarity.com/mp3/Saddam-The_Futon_Police.mp3]Saddam, where are the rockets[/url]

[sbrock1san.rr.com]

[quote]Originally posted by alcohol: [QB]It's pretty clear that the primary motivation for invading Iraq was to get Republicans elected. All the other arguments don't hold up.][/quote]Then why didn't the Republicans in charge plant WMD in Iraq so that the troops could have easily discovered them ? If this was all a grand conspiracy, then why didn't they complete the task ?

[Wow]

[quote] It's pretty clear that the primary motivation for invading Iraq was to get Republicans elected. All the other arguments don't hold up. [/quote]LOL LOL LOL I cant stop LOL LOL Alcohol and the Wewus are some funny people. :D [quote] I think it's clear that Bush should be impeached [/quote]Please make this your tag-line, that way you dont have to type it 8 times a day. :)

[alcohol]

"Then why didn't the Republicans in charge plant WMD in Iraq so that the troops could have easily discovered them ? If this was all a grand conspiracy, then why didn't they complete the task ?" Well Bush got caught with the forged Nigerian document, the killer drones they claimed were model airplanes, the mobile bio labs were hydrogen factories for baloons. Maybe they realize that they can't get away with planting WMDs. They got caught fumbling everything else.

[whitefang]

[quote]Originally posted by GZsound: [b]Do any of you know the political party of the administrations that got us into Vietnam, World War 2, North Korea? Every major conflict this country has ever had has begun under a democratic administration. Some of these conflicts have never been resolved and we still have troops in place and in harms way scores of years later. Where is the outrage? [/b][/quote]I'm glad YOU remember all of that. I know I did, which is why I was laughing one night a few months ago when on one of the "news" channel conservative "circle jerks" some woman was going on about how Democrats have a history of "backing down" from war and conflict. Both parties have a less than pristine reputation when it comes to matters of war and rights. From Roosevelt sitting idly by as Jim Crow laws continued, to Truman's federal interference in labor squabbles. From Hoover's cowtowing to big busimess, to McCarthy's tunnel-visioned witch hunts. From Nixon's Watergate deceit to Clinton's NAFTA support. Both parties have been involved in many of the great strides this country has made, and the great blunders. To say one party has served this country better than the other is not only narrow minded, it's reprehensively naive! And as you're quick to blame the "liberals" for the quagmire of the Viet Nam conflict, remember this; it was also the "liberals" who vehemently opposed it. Where were the conservatives at the time? Busy griping about poor people getting federal relief. And whining about hippies having fun. You know, real IMPORTANT stuff. When all you DOGMA junkies realize that neither party really cares about "the people" until it comes time to win votes, maybe you'll all quit this barbershop debating! Whitefang

[Saint Johnny B]

If you go back to page 3 and link to John Dean's article you'll see the real motive for Bush's unjustified, unilaterial invasion of IRAQ and the Bush regime ordering the murder of thousands of innocent civilians including women and children: It's the oil! In the lawyerly John Dean article, I think one of Bush's little criminal minions used words like "Iraq is swimming over a sea of oil." Bush and his gang are criminals, they lie, they steal, they cheat, they murder. They all belong behind bars in a maximum security prison. Bush, Kathy Harris, Dick Cheney, Ken Lay, and the rest of the Bush criminal enterprise should all be locked up. Save the World Save America Jail Bush Now! You'll be glad you did.

[Super 8]

[b][i]"Do you guys want some cookies???"[/b][/i] [img]http://www.tl.infi.net/~bvandyke/gs70.jpg[/img]

[GZsound]

I think it will be really interesting to read all the comments on this list if indeed, WMD are found in Iraq. They have found mobile chemical labs and you guys skip over that find. They have found pieces of nuke making machinery buried in some guys back yard and you all skip over it. You quote Michael Moore like he wrote the bible. I wish some of you would start quoting Joe Lieberman, who I think is supposed to be a pretty well informed guy. But no, it's always some fringe left wing zealot that wrote a book nobody read that gets your attention. And you talk about Dick Morris and his lack of character yet ignore Michael Moore and his serious lack of character in the production of his documentarys. You complain about the adminstration telling lies to the public, and yet defend the last administration as the paragon of virtue because "things were great". Phony bookkeeping, secrets being sent to China, and even stealing the furniture out of the White House doesn't shake your conviction that we had honorable folks in power. Giving favors to the rich and powerful is what this administration is all about according to you highly intelligent types. Giving pardons to Mark Rich, drug dealors, bomb makers, hoodlums, etc. and making the presidents brother rich in the processs doesn't bother any of you a bit. One sided hatred makes zero sense. The "things were great during the Clinton years" comments totally ignore the facts, totally ignores the downturn in the economy prior to the end of the Clinton administration, totally ignores the false values in the internet stocks, and the bursting bubble that started during the last administration. There is a simple fact available for all. Check out the history of the stock market and see what the date was when it started to turn bad. Very easy. You might be surprised to find out who was in power. Thus far, nobody in the democratic leadership of America has said anything about impeaching Mr. Bush. The talks come from the fringe far out left wing. They (and you if it fits) have the same credence as the far right wing zealots. zero. Quoting Michael Moore is no different than if I start quoting David Duke. If any of you have real proof that Mr. Bush has committed an impeachable offense, present it to your congressman or senator. If not, stop with the empty headed nonsense and the quoting of "facts" from the fringe. If laws were broken, there are remedies. For example, your Mr. Clinton, the pillar of virtue to some of you, cannot practice law. Disbarred. Found guilty of lying. By a court. Not by some right wing nutcase. Do any of you see the difference or is your hate so strong that facts just simply don't get in the way?

[alcohol]

Mark G You skipper you. got your jump rope? Because the conclusion on the mobile chemical labs is that they are meant to generate hydrogen for military balloons and were sold to them by the British. Whyd id you skip that little bit? The pieces of uranium enriching centrifuge were buried 12 years ago. Analysts agree that it isn't a smoking gun of nuclear weapons program that has the capability of making a bomb in months time as Bush claimed Iraq had. skip Skip Skip to my G, Skipper Sound , has a more true ring to it. No one quoted Michael Moore in this thread, but WOW mentioned him in a disparaging way in comparison to Dick (Clinton beat me up) Morris. So saying that Michael Moore is quoted like the Bible is not a bit hyperbolic, it's a GZ fantasy. GZ Sound,,,G Fantasy Sound has a more honest ring to it. The people comparing Bush to Clinton are generally Bush apologists. It's a diversion from examining the real crimes of this administration. The sending of nuclear secrets started in the senior Bush administration, why did you skip that morsel, the stealing of furniture from the Whitehouse, can't find that crime on the interent, maybe that was like the bogus allegations that Clinton's people damaged equipment when they vacated their offices. We could go on and on, But the big SALIENT FACT that towers over everything is that Bush presented forged documents to Congress and to the American people as reasons to go to war. The other BIG FACT is that all the bluster about WMD have turned up false. Skip skip skip to my GZ, Skip skip skip to my GZ, Skip skip skip to my GZ, Hey GZ give me a little more real world nomenclature, Did you buy a jump rope amd declare it a tax right off? LOL

[Franknputer]

[quote]Originally posted by GZsound: [b] One sided hatred makes zero sense. [/b][/quote]Remember that.

[schmee]

[b]LIE #10:[/b] "Yes, we found a biological laboratory in Iraq which the UN prohibited." – President Bush in remarks in Poland, published internationally June 1, 2003. [b]FACT:[/b] This was reference to the discovery of two modified truck trailers that the CIA claimed were potential mobile biological weapons lab. But British and American experts – including the State Department's intelligence wing in a report released this week – have since declared this to be untrue. According to the British, and much to Prime Minister Tony Blair's embarrassment, the trailers are actually exactly what Iraq said they were; facilities to fill weather balloons, sold to them by the British themselves. [url=http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16274]source[/url] :rolleyes:

[Wow]

Alcohol, I think your last post made the point Mark was trying to make, You overlook the previous administration and make excuses for them but hold the current administration to a different standard. So I take it you are not changing your tag-line. :wave: Are you a democrat , republican , libertarian , communist , socialist ? Please don't say " I am a independent" . The 5 listed above cover most of the spectrum. You don't have to agree with everything that one party does but you do generally agree with who? :confused:

[GZsound]

I agree the "smoking gun" has not been found in Iraq. I agree one of the reason given for the attack against Iraq was because they had WMD and we have not found any yet. I totally agree there was a breakdown in the intelligence given and interpreted, and that documents that later turned out to be false could have been used to convince the administration we needed to attack Iraq. So someone, anyone, please provide evidence of an impeachable offense. Alkyhol, I have said in the past and I will repeat for you.. Every former administration has had some seriously stupid foreign policy regarding the middle east. Carter, Raygun, Bush I, Ford, Cliton, etc. We have made a mess in the area, we armed the wrong folks, helped the wrong folks, etc. The mishandling of the area has come back to haunt us. Thus, I don't skip over anything. I do not blame Cliton for causing the problem and skip over what Bush 1 has contributed anymore than I blame Jimmy Carter for the problems and leave out Reagan. What bothers me is how you guys can "skip over" the facts of how bad our policy in the area has been for years. We now have a totally different method of trying to deal with the middle east. It has not been since Pearl Harbor that an American president has said "we were attacked and we are going to kick your ass" and actually done it. Do any of you know which president actually got Hamas and the Palestine terrorists to declare a cease fire? Do you know which presidents have tried and failed? Do you know why Iran is being very careful in it aggression right now? Do you know why the Saudi's are more than a little worried about relations with us? The unprecedented military victory in Iraq sent a message to the world that we have not sent since WW II. The world watched us smother Iraq in weeks on Television. So, instead of seeing any good whatsoever in what we are trying to do, you decide to find whatever nit you can pick that supports your hatred. I actually wish we did have a democratic President right now, the silence on this forum would be deafening. History has already judged the accomplishments (and foibles) of former presidents and history will judge the accomplishments, or foibles of this one. The stunning military victory against Iraq is already in the books. The historic cease fire in Palestine and Israel will be historic if it works. Peace in the middle east will be historic if we can accomplish it. Name me one liberal, one Democrat that has had any success whatsoever in bringing any peace at all to the middle east, to Israel, etc. Please.. Somebody? I know Mr. Cliton tried to buy the Nobel Peace Prize for his contributions, but since he didn't contribute, Mark Rich just couldn't afford it. You may attack me for being a conservative, a Republican, a right winger, a fool, whatever. But the mantra of "he's bad, I hate him" while offering nothing in the form of constructive ideas is typical. Impeach him..fine. Then offer your suggestion for leadership of America after you are successful in impeaching Mr. Bush. John Dean? Lieberman? Who? And what would they do differently? Would they be honest with America? Would they give us back all our rights? Open the borders, leave the terrorists alone, bring all the troops home, defund the military and the intelligence community? Alchohol, tell me what a democratic president would do that you would support. Tell me with a straight face they would be honest with us. Never lie, stretch the truth, mislead. Tell me with a straight face they would not show favortism towards the unions and corporations that give them the most money. Tell me all our problems would be solved, all our rights returned to us, all our people would be safe, etc. if only we had a democratic president. I await the Baghdad Bob reply....

[sbrock1san.rr.com]

[quote]Originally posted by GZsound: [b]I await the Baghdad Bob reply[/b][/quote]:D

[the stranger]

[quote]Originally posted by GZsound: [b] So someone, anyone, please provide evidence of an impeachable offense. ....[/b][/quote]There is more than enough evidence to show that GB and Cheney were directly involved in the Enron scandal. The records of the meeting between these two parties are sealed and not being allowed for public review. This administration refuses to turn over documents to the SEC concerning this matter. What happens if I refuse to turn over documents to the SEC? I bet I'd go to jail. So, I don't care about all this liberal this, conservative that. I don't care about Iraq or WDM's. All these things are a diversion from the real crimes going on. Yes, the invasion of Iraq id questionable, but seems to be supported by the majority, so I support my troops. I don't support this endless list of accusations regarding crimes of a domestic financial nature. Do I think GB should go to Jail. Yes. Did I think Clinton should go to jail. Yes. If the truth be known, every politician of the last 80 years commited jailable offenses. I don't care what freakin' party they belong to. I'm sick and damn tired of the politicans being held to a different standard than the common man. These people should be held accountable just as I'm am. Anybody who thinks GB is any less of a crook than BC should look at his resume... GB Resume: Ran for congress and lost. Produced a Hollywood slasher B movie. Bought an oil company, but couldn't find any oil in Texas, company went bankrupt shortly after I sold all my stock. Bought the Texas Rangers baseball team in a sweetheart deal that took land using tax-payer money. Biggest move: Traded Sammy Sosa to the Chicago White Sox. With fathers help (and his name) was elected Governor of Texas. Accomplishments: Changed pollution laws for power and oil companies and made Texas the most polluted state in the Union. Replaced Los Angeles with Houston as the most smog ridden city in America. Cut taxes and bankrupted the Texas government to the tune of billions in borrowed money. Set record for most executions by any Governor in American history. Became president after losing the popular vote by over 500,000 votes, with the help of my fathers appointments to the Supreme Court. Accomplishments as president: Attacked and took over two countries. Spent the surplus and bankrupted the treasury. Shattered record for biggest annual deficit in history. Set economic record for most private bankruptcies filed in any 12 month period. Set all-time record for biggest drop in the history of the stock market. First president in decades to execute a federal prisoner. First president in US history to enter office with a criminal record. First year in office set the all-time record for most days on vacation by any president in US history. After taking the entire month of August off for vacation, presided over the worst security failure in US history. Set the record for most campaign fund-raising trips than any other president in US history. In my first two years in office over 2 million Americans lost their job. Cut unemployment benefits for more out of work Americans than any president in US history. Set the all-time record for most foreclosures in a 12 month period. Appointed more convicted criminals to administration positions than any president in US history. Set the record for the least amount of press conferences than any president since the advent of television. Signed more laws and executive orders amending the Constitution than any president in US history. Presided over the biggest energy crises in US history and refused to intervene when corruption was revealed. Presided over the highest gasoline prices in US history and refused to use the national reserves as past presidents have. Cut healthcare benefits for war veterans. Set the all-time record for most people worldwide to simultaneously take to the streets to protest me (15 million people), shattering the record for protest against any person in the history of mankind. (http://www.hyperreal.org/~dana/marches/) Dissolved more international treaties than any president in US history. My presidency is the most secretive and un-accountable of any in US history. Members of my cabinet are the richest of any administration in US history. (the 'poorest' multi-millionaire, Condoleeza Rice has an Chevron oil tanker named after her). First president in US history to have all 50 states of the Union simultaneously go bankrupt. Presided over the biggest corporate stock market fraud of any market in any country in the history of the world. First president in US history to order a US attack and military occupation of a sovereign nation. Created the largest government department bureaucracy in the history of the United States. Set the all-time record for biggest annual budget spending increases, more than any president in US history. First president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from the human rights commission. First president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from the elections monitoring board. Removed more checks and balances, and have the least amount of congressional oversight than any presidential administration in US history. Rendered the entire United Nations irrelevant. Withdrew from the World Court of Law. Refused to allow inspectors access to US prisoners of war and by default no longer abide by the Geneva Conventions. First president in US history to refuse United Nations election inspectors (during the 2002 US elections). All-time US (and world) record holder for most corporate campaign donations. My biggest life-time campaign contributor presided over one of the largest corporate bankruptcy frauds in world history (Kenneth Lay, former CEO of Enron Corporation). Spent more money on polls and focus groups than any president in US history. First president in US history to unilaterally attack a sovereign nation against the will of the United Nations and the world community. First president to run and hide when the US came under attack (and then lied saying the enemy had the code to Air Force 1) First US president to establish a secret shadow government. Took the biggest world sympathy for the US after 911, and in less than a year made the US the most resented country in the world (possibly the biggest diplomatic failure in US and world history). With a policy of 'dis-engagement' created the most hostile Israeli-Palestine relations in at least 30 years. First US president in history to have a majority of the people of Europe (71%) view my presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and stability. First US president in history to have the people of South Korea more threatened by the US than their immediate neighbor, North Korea. Changed US policy to allow convicted criminals to be awarded government contracts. Set all-time record for number of administration appointees who violated US law by not selling huge investments in corporations bidding for government contracts. Failed to fulfill my pledge to get Osama Bin Laden 'dead or alive'. Failed to capture the anthrax killer who tried to murder the leaders of our country at the United States Capitol building. After 18 months I have no leads and zero suspects. In the 18 months following the 911 attacks I have successfully prevented any public investigation into the biggest security failure in the history of the United States. Removed more freedoms and civil liberties for Americans than any other president in US history. In a little over two years created the most divided country in decades, possibly the most divided the US has ever been since the civil war. Entered office with the strongest economy in US history and in less than two years turned every single economic category heading straight down. Records and References: At least one conviction for drunk driving in Maine (Texas driving record has been erased and is not available). AWOL from National Guard and Deserted the military during a time of war. Refused to take drug test or even answer any questions about drug use. All records of my tenure as governor of Texas have been spirited away to my fathers library, sealed in secrecy and un-available for public view. All records of any SEC investigations into my insider trading or bankrupt companies are sealed in secrecy and un-available for public view. All minutes of meetings for any public corporation I served on the board are sealed in secrecy and un-available for public view. Any records or minutes from meetings I (or my VP) attended regarding public energy policy are sealed in secrecy and un-available for public review. For personal references please speak to my daddy or uncle James Baker (They can be reached at their offices of the Carlyle Group for war-profiteering.)

[alcohol]

I can't say that any Democrat would necessarily be more honest than any Republican. I could argue that some past administrations have been better than others. That isn't the point. That's not skipping anything. Saying that during the Clinton administration nuclear and missle making secrets got to China and then ignoring that the start of leaks of nuclear secrets missle making secrets happened during Bush I is skipping details on the very point your trying to make. I'm not making those points because they are irrelevant. Our job as citizens is to hold our elected officials accountable.The elected officials we have right now. Not excuse the present officials because the prior ones could have been better. I think it's a dereliction of civil responsibility to argue that because some administration previous to now had some problems it should mitigate our criticism of Bush. GZ did you ever respond to a criticism against Clinton that the scandals of the Reagan and Bush administration need to be considered? That Clinton needs to be judged within the perspective of scandals of past administrations? As far as the positive results of our aggression on Iraq in intimidating Iran, etc., I can see them. We established that we would retaliate to actions against us in Afganistan. I fully supported that. I even initially supported Bush on attacking Iraq. I thought the arguments were a bit weak but I gave the administration the benefit of the doubt. After all he's the President of my country, a position he attained through democratic procedure, deserving of my respect and consideration at least on that basis.Then it was revealed that the Bush/Powell evidence for WMD was crap, forgeries, exagerations, bogus. A line had/has to be drawn. It's called honesty. Doesn't matter what the positive side effects of attacking Iraq are when it was done for dishonest reasons. The dishonesty or incompetence undermines whatever positive side effects there are. There are negative results too. They have to be weighed. They can't be ignored. Military victory isn't the only manner of regime change. Waiting Saddam out like we waited out the Soviet Union is doing something, more efficient, less expensive and Americans don't need to die in the process. We're in a quagmire right now and getting out of it without paying a heavy price looks increasingly unlikely. Don't take my word for it. "The U.S.-led attack could end up bringing about the very threat that prompted it in the first place--the proliferation of Iraqi weapons to terrorist organizations--if we do not finish what we have begun by establishing a stable and peaceful regime in Iraq......... The current military structure was designed in the 1990s when all the talk was of a "strategic pause" and a prolonged period of peace. What pause there was has vanished, and it is not peace that now looks likely to be prolonged. Expanding the armed forces to match the missions they must perform is an urgent task. An Army of Lots More Than One From the July 7 / July 14, 2003 issue: Our military is too small for the jobs it has to do. by Frederick Kagan http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/849ienyw.asp Personally I don't want the US to become the world's policeman. I have an 18 old son, I don't want him to be drafted and sent on missions by a chief executive who invites Iraqi's to attack US forces. I don't want my President to be sending my fellow citizens and my own children to war and have him justify it to me on the basis of forged documents. If this or any other President makes these kinds of demands on me than I demand he justify these demands with competence, honesty and wisdom. And this is the tip of the tragic iceberg Bush just piloted us into hitting.

[Saint Johnny B]

First, Clinton is ancient history and has nothing whatsoever to do the massive crimes being commited by the Bush Criminal Enterprise. Second, coming up with a decent replacement for the Bush gang of murderers and thieves is not the question, the question is should we impeach him now, not too likely with a right-wing controlled congress, or send Bush and the rest of his gang to jail. The next question would be, which maximum security prison Bush, Ken Lay, Dick Cheney and the rest should occupy. The last question would be, how much time Bush and the rest of the criminals should spend in jail. And the "I" word has been used on the floor of the Congress of the United States. Do a search, and you'll find it on the web. You can also find by way of web-search a streaming movie having to do with "Only In America" showing Geo Bush talking at a wedding and being drunk. At the end of the video, Bush takes another huge gulp of booze. Of course, we can't send Bush to jail for being a drugged-out, drunken moron. But his self-inflicted state provides little, if any, defense to the major crimes Bush and his gang are carrying out. Save the World Save America Jail Bush Now! You'll be glad you did.

[sbrock1san.rr.com]

[quote]Originally posted by Johnny B: [b]You can also find by way of seach a streaming movie having to do with "Only In America" showing Geo Bush talking at a wedding and being drunk. At the end of the video Bush takes another gulp of booze.[/b][/quote]Wow, a whole gulp of booze ! :eek:

[Wow]

[quote] You can also find by way of seach a streaming movie having to do with "Only In America" showing Geo Bush talking at a wedding and being drunk. At the end of the video Bush takes another gulp of booze. [/quote]Does that qualify as a "high" crime? or a misdemeanor? :)

[Saint Johnny B]

Well it was obvious that it was only one of many gulps and snorts Bush had ingested. I just don't feel confortable with a drugged-out, drunken moron like Bush having his hand so close to the button. But look at the little record of Bush's crimes posted above on the previous page, just withholding evidence, in and of itself, is a crime. John Dean, the former lawyer for the president of the United States, lays out additonal crimes Bush is guilty of in his recent scholarly article. People need to open their eyes, look at that list posted above on the previous page, it's only the tip of the iceberg for all the crimes the Bush Gang are commtting. What you have is a Racketeering, Corrupt, Influenced, Organization ("RICO" under the US Code) currently occupying the White House, that's a felony. These criminals, murder, lie, cheat, and steal, and they all belong behind bars. Save the World Save America Jail Bush Now! You'll be glad you did.

[sbrock1san.rr.com]

[quote]Originally posted by Johnny B: [b]John Dean, the former lawyer for the president of the United States, lays out additonal crimes Bush is guilty of in his recent scholarly article. [/b][/quote]I like how you called Dean "the former lawyer for the president". Why not mention that the president was Richard Nixon and that Dean spent fourth months in jail for his role in the Watergate scandal.

[Saint Johnny B]

I was not aware of Dean the man who testified honestly in front of Congress going to jail for things Nixon did. That too, is besides the point. John Dean is a lawyer, a law professor, a scholar who addresses the crimes that the Bush Criminal Enterprise are now committing. That's the point! With the Bush Regime, we now have criminals in the White House. Why should Bush and his gang be able to commit crimes and then be above the law? Save the World Save America Jail Bush Now! You'll be glad you did.

[Wow]

[quote] You'll be glad you did. [/quote]Thats a matter of opinion and you have stated your position clearly.

[Saint Johnny B]

I did not know the Bush Family financed the Nazi's and Hitler. Here's a link: http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_lavello_041403_bush.html

[Jotown]

[quote]Originally posted by SteveRB: [b] [quote]Originally posted by Johnny B: [b]John Dean, the former lawyer for the president of the United States, lays out additonal crimes Bush is guilty of in his recent scholarly article. [/b][/quote]I like how you called Dean "the former lawyer for the president". Why not mention that the president was Richard Nixon and that Dean spent fourth months in jail for his role in the Watergate scandal.[/b][/quote]Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfie all worked for Nixon. So what is your point?

[Saint Johnny B]

Hey, it's news that the Bush Family financed the Nazi's and Hitler.

[Saint Johnny B]

Here's a link to an entire book written by a Brig. General that shows illegal drug running activities and even more crimes committed by the Bush Gang. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0922356807/104-8058670-4691926?vi=glance Save the World Save America Jail Bush Now! You'll be glad you did.

[Dogfur]

[quote]Originally posted by GZsound: [b] So someone, anyone, please provide evidence of an impeachable offense. [/b][/quote]"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." – President Bush, Jan.28, 2003, in the State of the Union address. This administration was made aware that this info was not correct but chose to bolster their argument for war with it anyway. If the story from intelligence sources that it was intentionally disregarded gets wheels in the corporate media (highly unlikely) the very impeachable offence of purposely misleading Congress would and should cause impeachment proceedings to begin.

[Super 8]

[quote]Originally posted by alcohol: [b]Hey GZ give me a little more real world nomenclature, Did you buy a jump rope amd declare it a tax right off? LOL[/b][/quote]One thing is for sure! We DID find the EMD -Evidence of Mass Destruction... But what the fuck gives with all of your little digs, Alcohol??? I thought this was an issue you cared about. It appears from your writing that you are more interested in winning the argument -as if it were possible- than arriving at any solid conclusions.

[Wow]

I wonder who Johnny B really is on this board? :confused: