Bluesape Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Anyone got one of these? I've had mine 31 years - pumped gas to pay for it - sweetest sounding axe I own, but being a big jazz box, it's a little harder to rock out on. I don't play it a lot these days, but I'd feel a real sense of loss if I let it go, and I've been offered good money for it. Anybody else got a sentimental piece they hang onto? Never a DUH! moment! Well, almost never. OK, OK! Sometimes never! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Ellwood Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Yep my ES125 and a Gretch Clipper I gave to my son. http://www.thestringnetwork.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillWelcome Home Studios Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Originally posted by Bluesape: ....it's a little harder to rock out on. ...I'd feel a real sense of loss if I let it go, and I've been offered good money for it. Anybody else got a sentimental piece they hang onto? Ya think? I don't. Some of the best rockers used large hollowbodied guitars. If you can live without the money, keep the guitar. You'll spend the money and it will be gone. You'll admire and cherish the guitar forever. I've sold and/or given away some serious axes over the years, and there are times when I'm sorry that I did that with most every one of them. (I only miss a couple of the amps though, go figure...) Of course, they are tools, and there are more where those ones came from. I'm used to a number of my guitars being out in the studio and being able to just grab any one of them at will. Since I gave up the studio and moved to an apartment, the guitars are mostly left in the closets. It's wierd enough that they are put away, but at least I know that they are there. Bill "I believe that entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot." Steve Martin Show business: we're all here because we're not all there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardtail Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Just play some Uncle Ted songs on it and you'll be fine. Seriously, nice axe. Don't get rid of it. I'd love to have one and string it up with some big fat flatwounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LPCustom Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Is it the D model? Or does it have just one P-90? It looks a lot like the ES-300 I have (but without the funky looking pickup). I'd keep it if money isn't a problem. Guitars like that will only appreciate over time. I definitely wouldn't give (or sell) it to someone who doesn't appreciate what a piece of craftsmanship it is unless they make you a _very_ good offer. Like they say, they aren't making any more 1970s guitars. So I'd hang onto it if I could. The fact that Gibson still makes ES-175s attests to its popularity. They've been making that model since 1949 (56 years). Besides, if you play it and enjoy playing it, why get rid of it? Born on the Bayou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caevan O’Shite Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Yeah, I love those, and the ES-165/"Herb Ellis" models, too (pretty much the same thing, but with only one neck-position pickup). I'm with KPB, I'd also string it with flat-wounds, either "13's" or "14's", or maybe those small-winding round-wound "be-bop" strings that Thomastik-Infeld uses for some of their George Benson line of strings, also "13's" or "14's". Especially with other guitars on-hand for rock 'n' blues 'n' country 'n' such... Ask yourself- What Would Ren and Stimpy Do? ~ Caevan James-Michael Miller-O'Shite ~ _ ___ _ Leprechaun, Esquire _ ___ _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluesape Posted October 16, 2005 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 I've had no urges to sell it - sorry if I came accross that way. It's a '65 or '66 with one humbucker, tobacco sunburst. It's had 8s on it for over 30 years, dunno if it would take heavy strings, don't wanna know. I just gotta get it out more, and yeah I know Steve Howe, Neil Schon, and others use jazz boxes at times. I guess feedback is the main reason I don't bring it out much. Never a DUH! moment! Well, almost never. OK, OK! Sometimes never! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caevan O’Shite Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 One humbucker, eh? Is it at the neck, or the bridge? Was it made stock that way? I'd love to see a pic of that! Ask yourself- What Would Ren and Stimpy Do? ~ Caevan James-Michael Miller-O'Shite ~ _ ___ _ Leprechaun, Esquire _ ___ _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluesape Posted October 16, 2005 Author Share Posted October 16, 2005 Neck position, fully stock - I'm told the pickup is identical to a PAF, but I've never taken it out. Dunno if I have a digital pic - have to work on that. Thanks, Cav. Reif Never a DUH! moment! Well, almost never. OK, OK! Sometimes never! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caevan O’Shite Posted October 16, 2005 Share Posted October 16, 2005 Sounds like I would probably like that guitar VERY much, with the aforementioned heavier-gauge flat-wounds or T-I "Be-bop" strings... !! Ask yourself- What Would Ren and Stimpy Do? ~ Caevan James-Michael Miller-O'Shite ~ _ ___ _ Leprechaun, Esquire _ ___ _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave251 Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 It's been my experience that the short scale Gibson archtops need 13's to get the best tonal response....8's would barely get the top moving. You'll also notice a slight increase in the gain/feedback ration with a heavier string...raises the top resonance frequency... I'd take that thing to a good tech, and have it completely gone over...fret dress, fresh BIG strings. And if you're used to playing REALLY light strings, you'll have a light touch with your right hand...so you can drop the action WAY down...will play like butter and have that FAT tone you can only get from a Gibson archie.... Dave Wendler Instruments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LPCustom Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Hmm. I prefer 12s in my ES-300. 13s are too heavy. Even 12s feel like piano strings on it. Born on the Bayou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caevan O’Shite Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 See, on a flat-top acoustic, "twelves" feel TOO LIGHT to me! Same with a bona-fide/dedicated jazz-box. I'm NOT saying anybody's wrong liking really light gauge strings, just that they're wrong for ME. Ask yourself- What Would Ren and Stimpy Do? ~ Caevan James-Michael Miller-O'Shite ~ _ ___ _ Leprechaun, Esquire _ ___ _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluesape Posted October 17, 2005 Author Share Posted October 17, 2005 Originally posted by dave251: It's been my experience that the short scale Gibson archtops need 13's to get the best tonal response....8's would barely get the top moving. You'll also notice a slight increase in the gain/feedback ration with a heavier string...raises the top resonance frequency... It's got a maple top, and the last thing it needs is more feedback. A buddy here has a 175 with 12 or 13 flatwounds. I'm gonna have to A-B them through my rig to see if the difference is desireable enough to make that change. I still don't think it would get a ton of use, as I'm more acclimated to a solid body. Never a DUH! moment! Well, almost never. OK, OK! Sometimes never! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caevan O’Shite Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 What Dave means is, the gain before feedback ratio is improved, due to the rise in the resonant frequency when the top is loaded with more tension from the strings. An acoustic arch-top behaves like an inverted speaker cone, with the string-pressed bridge pushing and pulling in and out on the top as the strings vibrate. Greater string-tension there is kinda like a higher degree of speaker damping in a tighter-sounding tube-amp, where the speaker's bass-excursion is more tightly controlled and less flappy. Then factor in the higher frequency-point of acoustic resonance that Dave cites, and between the two, you'll get less feedback for the same overall volume. Granted, we're not necessarily talking about typical gainy peaky electric rock or even blues volumes... A flat-top acoustic, on the other hand, usually has the string's pulling the bridge (and thus the top, to which it's glued) in a rolling, rippling motion towards the fingerboard, across the top from back to front (tail to neck). Ask yourself- What Would Ren and Stimpy Do? ~ Caevan James-Michael Miller-O'Shite ~ _ ___ _ Leprechaun, Esquire _ ___ _ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chad Thorne Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Originally posted by Dances With Werewolves: See, on a flat-top acoustic, "twelves" feel TOO LIGHT to me! Same with a bona-fide/dedicated jazz-box. I'm NOT saying anybody's wrong liking really light gauge strings, just that they're wrong for ME. I'm with the mad Irishman on this, I started out playing lo when the lightest strings you could buy were 10s. I run 12s on my dreadnaught and 11s on my Epi Joe Pass, might go to 12s on that too. 20 years ago, just after I started to play lefty, I was on W. 48th in NYC in one of those used guitar stores. He had a lefty 1963 ES-175 for $600.00. I put a deposit on it and came back home, intending to send him the balance and have him ship it to me. Back home, "buyer's remorse": I wasn't sure I'd be able to play lefty well enough to justify buying that guitar. So I cancelled the deal and got my deposit back. Now, 20 years down the road, I play pretty well, and every time I think of that guitar I find a flat, hard surface and bang my head on it a few times... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danzilla Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 Being a Steve Howe fan, I've always wanted an ES 175 (D). I've played several older ones that were nice, including one wned by the guy who sold me my/his ES 335. Very nice. However, a year or two ago I played a newer ES 175, at a Gibson showcase in Nashville, of all places, and couldn't stand the sound. Well, plugged it was ok; unplugged it didn't sound anywhere as nice. I think part of it was the finish; seemed like a thinner, satin-type finish that just felt, well, cheap. So I'd say stick with the one you've got; you can't just replace "it" with a newer one and end up in the same ballpark. "Am I enough of a freak to be worth paying to see?"- Separated Out (Marillion) NEW band Old band Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LPCustom Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 I think the difference in the tone between the older 175s and the newer ones is that the older ones used a ridiculously thin nitro-cellulose lacquer finish that let the wood do its thing. I don't know what they're finishing the newer guitars with but I think they lay it on pretty thick. In the dings that go to the wood in the '95 Les Paul Studio I just got, you can tell the finish is really thick (like 1/8 of an inch thick). A finish that thick might not stifle a solid body much but it's got to really affect a hollow body guitar like wrapping it in plastic. Born on the Bayou Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Ellwood Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 My ES335 vintage axe doesnt have very much finish left on it and unplugged it has tons of tone. This translates into useable tonal differences plugged in. I have played newer ones and unplugged there is a ton of difference..mine is really loud unplugged. http://www.thestringnetwork.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popcritic Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 My daughter Kaki King has owned a 70's ES-175 for several years. She used it back in May when she was the "house band" for several shows on NBC's Last Call with Carson Daly. I thought it looked and sounded great. Best-- Dave King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave251 Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Originally posted by popcritic: My daughter Kaki King has owned a 70's ES-175 for several years. She used it back in May when she was the "house band" for several shows on NBC's Last Call with Carson Daly. I thought it looked and sounded great. Best-- Dave King Hey Pop....don't you know tone is in the hands? And she got her hands from you(well, I'm assuming you partially contributed anyway)? You should be a proud guy.... So we want to know what gauge of strings she uses on the 175... Dave Wendler Instruments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.