Wewus432 Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 Why? How? Where? When? I was mic'ing a guitar amp with stereo mic's once and a real engineer walked up and asked me WHY I was mic'ing a mono source with stero mic's. I said something like, I don't know, because I'm stupid. I just saw the Rode NT5 Stereo Pair for $300.00 in the American Music Supply catalog which is what made me think of this topic.
Anifa Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 I'm not an engineer, but I have two AKG mic's that I use in recording voice. I run two tracks simultaneously on ONE voice, and then afterwards I adjust the settings to add warmth to the recording. I'm not going to try to talk technical talk because I go by ear, I put the highs and lows at different levels for each track and it makes the vocal sound fuller. You can take the man away from his music, but you can't take the music out of the man. Books by Craig Anderton through Amazon Sweetwater: Bruce Swedien\'s "Make Mine Music"
NOT Bolt Rifles Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by TheWewus: [b]Why? How? Where? When? I was mic'ing a guitar amp with stereo mic's once and a real engineer walked up and asked me WHY I was mic'ing a mono source with stero mic's. I said something like, I don't know, because I'm stupid. I just saw the Rode NT5 Stereo Pair for $300.00 in the American Music Supply catalog which is what made me think of this topic.[/b][/quote] [url=http://www.recordingeq.com/EQ/req0600/stereogt.htm]Good article here[/url] "Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." -- John Adams "I am a senior member, and thereby entilted to all the privileges and rights accorded said status" -- NBR
where02190 Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 I often double mic guitars, typically using a 57 and a sennheisser 409. Sometimes they get panned, sometimes not, but the combination of the two mics cn add a thickness a single mic cannto achieve once properly time aligned. Also, since each speaker will have it's own characteristic sound, blending them gives a multitude of options for tone prior to eq. FWIW, IMHO the NT5 is a painfully bright mic with little to no use for high end recordings. I tried them on several occaisions on a viriety fo insturments and did not find one application that the sound was pleasing. Hope this is helpful. Hope this is helpful. NP Recording Studios Analog approach to digital recording.
Gtoledo3 Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 This reminds me of those rode ads where they picture the rode nt3 mic next to the akg c1000(not that great of a mic). I was suprised when I heard the nt4 and nt5 (improved from the nt3). They don't even sound as good as the c1000! What were they thinking? The casing is a little nicer on the rode though. Want mix/tracking feedback? Checkout "The Fade"- www.grand-designs.cc/mmforum/index.php The soon-to-be home of the "12 Bar-Blues Project"
Botch. Posted February 12, 2003 Posted February 12, 2003 If you read interviews with sound engineers some of them play with angle/distance of mics on guitar amps for hours. Regardless of it being a mono source, each capsule of your stereo mic is going to hear something slightly different, and output something slightly different, so you're inevitably going to get a fuller sound. Ask your "real" engineer why he buys a separate preamp when there's one built into the board. :p Botch "Eccentric language often is symptomatic of peculiar thinking" - George Will www.puddlestone.net
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.