D. Gauss Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark has drafted Articles of Impeachment which will be delivered to Congress. She is calling for the Impeachment and removal from Office of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. they even have a nifty "you can vote" website. http://www.votetoimpeach.org -d. gauss
Lee Tyler Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 **Mr. Clark had a sex change??? [img]http://www.emotipad.com/emoticons/Thud.gif[/img] [quote]Originally posted by d gauss: [b]Former Attorney General Ramsey Clark has drafted Articles of Impeachment which will be delivered to Congress. **She is calling for the Impeachment and removal from Office of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. they even have a nifty "you can vote" website. http://www.votetoimpeach.org -d. gauss[/b][/quote] Joe Pine (60's talk show host who sported a wooden leg) to Frank Zappa -- "So, with your long hair, I guess that makes you a woman." Frank Zappa's response -- "So, with your wooden leg, I guess that makes you a table." http://www.nowhereradio.com/artists/album.php?aid=2001&alid=-1
Philip OKeefe Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 "Vote"? What a CROCK! There's no place to "vote" on that site - the only "choice" is to vote "for" impeachment, not against. That's not a credible "vote" - it sounds more like the "voting" allowed in Iraq, where you can only "choose" Saddam. :rolleyes: IMO, Bush has done NOTHING that qualifies as a "high crime / misdemeanor".
Philip OKeefe Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Don't worry Rick, to quote Forrest Gump "that's all I have to say about that". ;) Then again, everyone else and their uncle might just turn this into a 8 page megathread full of the usual rants, name calling and sophormoric behavior. :rolleyes:
lwilliam Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 It's certainly no secret that politicians do all kinds of things that normal people would consider "unethical" - at BEST. I doubt ANY president or even high-ranking federal politician would be free of most of those "charges". Certainly any CIA Director would be using those methods as their SOP. I think Clark is just trying to get some press so he can raise prices for the college lecture circuit, or his billing rate as an attorney. Larry W.
michael saulnier Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Gomer Pyle voice... [b]"Citizen's arrest, citizen's arrest!"[/b] :eek: guitplayer I'm still "guitplayer"! Check out my music if you like... http://www.michaelsaulnier.com
Dogfur Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by Philip O'Keefe: [b]IMO, Bush has done NOTHING that qualifies as a "high crime / misdemeanor".[/b][/quote]IMO, I will respectfully disagree, and thank you for your informative Digi 002 review. Woof!
Jeebus Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Bush is a clueless goon with too high a power/intelligence ratio. He is one of [b]The Men[/b] and he clearly shouldn't be. I voted to impeach.
Super 8 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by d gauss: [b]She is calling for the Impeachment and removal from Office of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Ashcroft. they even have a nifty "you can vote" website. [/b][/quote]Oh, geeezzzz!!! :rolleyes: Gimme a freaking break!!! This is why things in government get so fucked up. People don't want truth. They just want sound bites... So sad... Super 8 Hear my stuff here
patrick_dont_fret Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by Philip O'Keefe: [b]"Vote"? What a CROCK! There's no place to "vote" on that site - the only "choice" is to vote "for" impeachment, not against. That's not a credible "vote" - it sounds more like the "voting" allowed in Iraq, where you can only "choose" Saddam. :rolleyes: IMO, Bush has done NOTHING that qualifies as a "high crime / misdemeanor".[/b][/quote]Phil, it's a referendum, somewhat like a petition. They take all the names and compile them in a list and give that to the Congress, and if an overwhelming majority sign the referendum, they will do something with it after that. I'm not too sure what the process is, but hopefully they will bring it all the way home.
Skip_dup1 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 there is much amiss with his demeanor-impeach! better yet, ambush! I am Bush, therefore I ambush ahahahahahahahaaaaaa..... sorry. I need coffee.
Super 8 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by patrick_dont_fret: [b] it's a referendum, somewhat like a petition. They compile a list and give that to the Congress, and if an overwhelming majority sign the referendum, they will do something with it after that.[/b][/quote]No they won't... It's a sensless waste of time that will ultimately just piss people off and accomplish nothing. I agree with [b]lwilliam[/b], this loser just wants to sell a book or something. I hope a bird poops on his head! Super 8 Hear my stuff here
patrick_dont_fret Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Super8, you sure? I think that's what that was all about. I may be wrong but I may be right.
D. Gauss Posted February 7, 2003 Author Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by Philip O'Keefe: [b]"Vote"? What a CROCK! There's no place to "vote" on that site - the only "choice" is to vote "for" impeachment, not against. [/b][/quote]don't shoot the messenger! :) -d. gauss
Super 8 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by patrick_dont_fret: [b]I may be wrong but I may be right.[/b][/quote]Well, you'll probably be one or the other... Super 8 Hear my stuff here
BP3 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 Dubya just wants to protect you and your children. Yeah, that's grounds for impeachment. :thu:
gtrmac Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 I think he should be impeached for the election fraud that got him into office. A recent Newsweek poll showed that 65% of the respondents favored his plan to attack Iraq so there doesn't appear to be much hope of impeaching him for that. He did a great job in Afghanistan didn't he? Bin Laden is still at large and the Poppies will be ready for harvest soon. The CIA is controlling your thoughts. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. :D Mac Bowne G-Clef Acoustics Ltd. Osaka, Japan
Gtoledo3 Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by gtrmac: [b]I think he should be impeached for the election fraud that got him into office. A recent Newsweek poll showed that 65% of the respondents favored his plan to attack Iraq so there doesn't appear to be much hope of impeaching him for that. [/b][/quote]I hate seeing those kind of stats, being a designer of polls, and statistician... they are all a crock of shit! Especially the way they're being used now. The election pre-polls are simply skewed so that they can match who is going to be "put" in office. There is really no way to have a representative sample of the U.S., so any polls that claim that American's feel "x" about ____ are bullshit. The only way to get a representative sample is if the sample closely matches the larger body you're making predictions about, ie. you sample hispanics in Hialeah to determine what other hispanics in similar areas of Miami might think. You simply cannot stretch the science in the way that the media/politicans do and still have it yield valid results. And if that poll is right and 35% think we shouldn't go to war... just w/ normal statistical error that could actually be 40%. That's a pretty damn large amount. Want mix/tracking feedback? Checkout "The Fade"- www.grand-designs.cc/mmforum/index.php The soon-to-be home of the "12 Bar-Blues Project"
the stranger Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by Philip O'Keefe: [b]"Vote"? What a CROCK! There's no place to "vote" on that site - the only "choice" is to vote "for" impeachment, not against. That's not a credible "vote" - it sounds more like the "voting" allowed in Iraq, where you can only "choose" Saddam. :rolleyes: IMO, Bush has done NOTHING that qualifies as a "high crime / misdemeanor".[/b][/quote]If Bush is protecting Dick Cheney from being prosecuted in the following manner, than he is guilty of a serious crime. This isn't the only evidence of foul play by this administration. All one needs to do is go over the available campaign disclosure information, cross reference this with all the corporate scandal information, and then tell me what assumption you reach. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- =============================== NEWS FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY 2600 Virginia Avenue, NW, Suite 100 Washington DC 20037 World Wide Web: http://www.LP.org =============================== For release: February 6, 2003 =============================== For additional information: George Getz, Press Secretary Phone: (202) 333-0008 Ext. 222 E-Mail: pressreleases@hq.LP.org =============================== Justice Department's actions in Martha Stewart case reveal double standard, Libertarians say WASHINGTON, DC – Reports that federal investigators may file criminal charges against celebrity homemaker Martha Stewart raise a troubling question, Libertarians say: Why aren't Dick Cheney and Terry McAuliffe facing criminal charges as well? After all, both the vice president and the head of the Democratic National Committee have been accused of selling millions of dollars in stock before its value plummeted and ordinary investors lost their life savings. "Is there one standard of justice for television celebrities and another for political celebrities?" asked Geoffrey Neale, national chair of the Libertarian Party. "It's fair to ask whether Cheney and McAuliffe have been given political immunity by their friends in the federal government." Sources inside the Justice Department confided to reporters on Thursday that they have "a solid criminal case against Martha Stewart," who is accused of insider trading and obstruction of justice after dumping 4,000 shares of ImClone stock last year. Stewart's action came one day before the Food and Drug Administration rejected the firm's cancer drug – an action that caused the company's stock to plummet. But the investigation of Stewart has created a troubling double standard, Libertarians point out, because politicians such as Cheney and McAuliffe have gotten rich doing the exact same thing. * Cheney, former CEO of Halliburton Co., made $18.5 million in August 2000 when he sold his shares of company stock for $52 each. Shortly thereafter, the stock plunged to $13, and many ordinary investors lost their life savings. But instead of being referred to federal prosecutors, Cheney's case was quietly referred to the Securities and Exchange Commission, where it has languished for months. * McAuliffe, chairman of the Democratic National Committee and former chief fund-raiser for President Bill Clinton, reaped an $18 million profit in 1999 on an investment of $100,000 in telecommunications company Global Crossing. Though the company has since gone bankrupt and many investors are holding worthless stock, McAuliffe has escaped a criminal inquiry. "Why isn't Martha Stewart's case sitting on a shelf right next to Cheney's over at the Securities and Exchange Commission?" Neale asked. "And why aren't federal prosecutors threatening to slap handcuffs on Cheney and McAuliffe? "The answer is obvious: The Justice Department has a habit of engaging in selective prosecution – and if you're a powerful federal official you're probably not going to be selected. "But if you're an ordinary American – or a TV celebrity who can be exploited to benefit someone's career – you'd better abide by the law or risk having your life turned upside-down by zealous federal bureaucrats." Neale emphasized that Libertarians don't know whether the specific accusations against Stewart, Cheney or McAuliffe are true – only that their cases are being handled very differently by government prosecutors. The result, he said, is that "many people will wonder if justice is a game in America – in which certain individuals can lose their freedom and others always seem to win a get-out-of-jail free card."
the stranger Posted February 7, 2003 Posted February 7, 2003 P.S. It is a legit vote. If you choose to vote than you vote yes. No vote is a vote for no. :)
Wow Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 "I never had sexual relations with that woman, Miss. Lewenski" (wag finger at camera).
Bunny Knutson Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 I have a hangnail. https://bunny.bandcamp.com/ https://theystolemycrayon.bandcamp.com/
GZsound Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 "I think he should be impeached for the election fraud that got him into office. He did a great job in Afghanistan didn't he? Bin Laden is still at large and the Poppies will be ready for harvest soon." So, in spite of the fact none of your liberal friends, the liberal media, etc. have managed to count ballots in any way that show your guy Gore would have won the election, you still cling to your mantra. Don't let the fact get in the way. And your criteria for "winning" in Afghanastan is capturing Bin Hiden? Shutting down the terror training camps, allowing the Afghani's to elect their own democratic government, bringing freedom to millions of women who were basically in slavery all doesn't count because we didn't capture Bin Hiden? What are you a Western movie fan? We have to ride off with with horse and the girl for you to be happy? What exactly did your old buddy Bill Clinton do to solve the problem? He was handed Bin Hiden and did nothing. He lobbed missles into asprin factories with no UN vote, no congressional approval, etc. Do you think any of his actions led to 9/11? Do you think he made the terrorists a little angry at us? The Arab/Muslim world has very little respect for women. We know that. As leader of the free world, do you think it was smart to send Madaline Halfbright to the middle east? Compare her to Collin Powell..who do you think the Arabs/Muslims respect more? Still wish ALGORE would have won? Get a grip... Mark G. "A man may fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame others" -- John Burroughs "I consider ethics, as well as religion, as supplements to law in the government of man." -- Thomas Jefferson
Jotown Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 [quote]So, in spite of the fact none of your liberal friends, the liberal media, etc. have managed to count ballots in any way that show your guy Gore would have won the election, you still cling to your mantra. Don't let the fact get in the way. [/quote]Wrong. There are many studies that show the amount of corruption involved in the so-called "Florida Plan" that was in place before one vote was cast. The botched count notwithstanding. Read the lone dissenting supreme court justice's brief if you need a refresher course in how Bush stole Florida. You my friend, need to get a grip. Jotown:) "It's all good: Except when it's Great"
Bunny Knutson Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 Like I said, I have a hangnail. And dolphins are cool. https://bunny.bandcamp.com/ https://theystolemycrayon.bandcamp.com/
Wewus432 Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 All WE ARE SAYING IS GIVE DOLPHINS A CHANCE! [img]http://www.southwest.com.au/~kirbyhs/dolpicd1.jpg[/img]
Midimonk Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 yes please give us a chance Dont be a turtle :thu: I cannot be bought, and I cannot be threatened. But if you put them both together then I'm your man!"
Rick K. Posted February 8, 2003 Posted February 8, 2003 [quote]Originally posted by dBunny: [b]George W. Bush is a liar[/b][/quote]Please source this. Rick
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.