Tedster Posted June 13, 2002 Share Posted June 13, 2002 They've needed something to replace the 45 rpm single for some time, in my opinion. I don't see why not. As a matter of fact, that whole Napster phenomenon/debacle was probably due to the fact that on some subconscious level, people like the idea of being able to get one song without buying a whole CD...free or pay...something to replace the old 45. "Cisco Kid, was a friend of mine" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Posted June 13, 2002 Share Posted June 13, 2002 I'm not paying a dime for downloadable music until they can standardize a lossless compression format. Anything less than CD quality is not worth a dime, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talcott Posted June 13, 2002 Share Posted June 13, 2002 I agree that qaulity is important to me as well, but if someone wants the inferior format as well that should be available. The watermark idea was interesting. However in the end it could be too little too late. Talcott Ahh! Let us proclaim absolute truths. Let us dishonor war, No...glorious war does not exist. -Victor Hugo http://www.composerguitarist.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt.Hepworth Posted June 13, 2002 Share Posted June 13, 2002 Most kids can't hear the difference, especially with today's over the top mastering. No matter how good something is, there will always be someone blasting away on a forum somewhere about how much they hate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.