the surprising effects of stultification

[d halfnote]

[material culled from an article by Jude Stewart in the Atlantic]

 

Boredom, paradoxically, has become quite interesting to academics lately. The International Interdisciplinary Boredom Conference gathered humanities scholars in Warsaw for the fifth time in April. In early May, its less scholarly forerunner, Londons Boring Conference, celebrated seven years of delighting in tedium. At this event, people flock to talks about toast, double yellow lines, sneezing, and vending-machine sounds, among other snooze-inducing topics.

 

What, exactly, is everybody studying? One widely accepted psychological definition of boredom is the aversive experience of wanting, but being unable, to engage in satisfying activity. But how can you quantify a persons boredom level and compare it with someone elses? In 1986, psychologists introduced the Boredom Proneness Scale, designed to measure an individuals overall propensity to feel bored (whats known as trait boredom). By contrast, the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale, developed in 2008, measures a persons feelings of boredom in a given situation (state boredom). A German-led team has since identified five types of state boredom: indifferent, calibrating, searching, reactant, and apathetic (indifferent boredomcharacterized by low arousalwas the mellowest, least unpleasant kind; reactanthigh arousalwas the most aggressive and unpleasant.) Boredom may be miserable, but let no one call it simple.

 

Boredom has been linked to behavior issues including bad driving mindless snacking, binge-drinking, risky sex, and problem gambling. In fact, many of us would take pain over boredom. One team of psychologists discovered that two-thirds of men and a quarter of women would rather self-administer electric shocks than sit alone with their thoughts for 15 minutes. Probing this phenomenon, another team asked volunteers to watch boring, sad, or neutral films, during which they could self-administer electric shocks. The bored volunteers shocked themselves more and harder than the sad or neutral ones did.

 

But boredom isnt all bad. By encouraging contemplation and daydreaming, it can spur creativity. An early, much-cited study gave participants abundant time to complete problem-solving and word-association exercises. Once all the obvious answers were exhausted, participants gave more and more inventive answers to fend off boredom. A British study took these findings one step further, asking subjects to complete a creative challenge (coming up with a list of alternative uses for a household item). One group of subjects did a boring activity first, while the others went straight to the creative task. Those whose boredom pumps had been primed were more prolific.

 

In our always-connected world, boredom may be an elusive state, but it is a fertile one. Watch paint dry or water boil, or at least put away your smartphone for a while. You might unlock your next big idea.

 

[video:youtube]

[Eric Iverson]

Boredom? Well, some JOBS I have to do aren't all that interesting.....

There's so much entertainment out there these days that I don't see how anyone can stay bored all that long.... unless you're in the middle of the Sahara desert without any connections......

To me, the idea of classifying "states of boredom" is boring in and of itself, LOL.