zukskywalker Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Weird science, specifically a case for A=432 tuning. http://www.spiritscienceandmetaphysics.com/heres-why-you-should-convert-your-music-to-432-hz/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Sorry, I'm allergic to bullsh!t. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-missRichardTee Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Everything is relative, including pitch. Whether 432, or 444, these changes are glacially (even climate), slooow. You don't have ideas, ideas have you We see the world, not as it is, but as we are. "One mans food is another mans poison". I defend your right to speak hate. Tolerance to a point, not agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sMatt Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 that article looks like a bunch of BS... HOWEVER, I regularly have my piano tuned to A=442 instead of A=440 because it *sounds* better to me... it's a little brighter which I like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 It'd definitely sound a lot worse tuned to A432. They seem oblivious to the fact that musical instruments are designed to be tuned to A440. I highly doubt that any of these folks know shit from shinola about physics. I found no evidence of it the last time this came up a few months ago. Reading their tripe made my head hurt. So I won't be dropping a new transmission into my B3 any time soon. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Dan Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Certain theories even suggest that the nazi regime has been in favor of adopting this pitch as standard after conducting scientific researches to determine which range of frequencies best induce fear and aggression. Whether or not the conspiracy is factual......is of no consequence to us. It sounds controversial so we'll run with it." Dan Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 When they play the Nazi card you know they're full of it. Sort of like Dm being the saddest of all keys, except they seem to be serious about it. Lick my love pump. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Wright Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8lK2el5pnbU/S-dDjMziqsI/AAAAAAAAGMc/YkZMHVA2-5k/s1600/SpinalTap_.jpg "I cried when I wrote this song Sue me if I play too long" Walter Becker Donald Fagan 1977 Deacon Blues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Muscara Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I skimmed that article when I first saw it on FB a few days ago. It's nothing but claims and anecdotes. Show me a scientific study (or better, several) that proves that people react better to music tuned to 432 Hz and we can talk. A few folks saying "hey maaan, I like it better at this pitch" don't mean $#!^. "I'm so crazy, I don't know this is impossible! Hoo hoo!" - Daffy Duck "The good news is that once you start piano you never have to worry about getting laid again. More time to practice!" - MOI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-missRichardTee Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 It would disenfranchise so many horn flutes, saxes, etc players, B3 players too. Just to be nice and open minded, not a nazi ( re nazi card ) , what if I said, sure the acoustic guitar playing at 432 did sound better to me. It also sounded less bright, timbre wise. Whether this is eq, or engineering trick, or whether the dropping in pitch naturally, and acoustically caused the perceived lessening of brightness, I know not. But I admit, I liked the 432 a tad better. That does not mean anything in isolation though. You don't have ideas, ideas have you We see the world, not as it is, but as we are. "One mans food is another mans poison". I defend your right to speak hate. Tolerance to a point, not agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brettymike Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 To me , all the music tuned to 432hz sounded flat and a bit lifeless. The 440hz sounds superior. But the water mysteries has mainstream scientists burying their heads in the sand , with no answers , and not wanting to try and give an answer. For reasons I won't go into , in case I ruffle some feathers on a couple of people here . Brett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miden Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 LOL, reminds me of that episode of Myth Busters where they tried to prove/disprove the "theory" that really low frequency sound waves can cause the human bowel to "release" as it were Of course it turned out to be similar to this article and just a pile of s#it ( or the lack of), so was was classified as busted! There is no luck - luck is simply the confluence of circumstance and co-incidence... Time is the final arbiter for all things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I'm kind of hairy, but I don't have feathers. I might be willing to drink a pint or two of tuning fluid and play with some 432 folks if they have a great answer to kanker's favorite question. But I don't think that'll ever happen. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B3Nut Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Yeah, that's been going around...pegged the BS-O-Meter right out of the gate. They even Godwinned themselves in record time. TP --- Todd A. Phipps "...no, I'm not a Hammondoholic...I can stop anytime..." http://www.facebook.com/b3nut ** http://www.blueolives.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zukskywalker Posted February 17, 2014 Author Share Posted February 17, 2014 OK, I apologize for posting a link to such sewage. It was just a look at something different from convention. There's a somewhat similar thing going on about how we perceive color. Just because we all agree what color red is doesn't mean we all see the same color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldwin Funster Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Some guitar players like a lower tuning because bending strings a whole step or more is hard work and even causes tendinitis for some players but tuning down makes the strings more slack and easier work. Hendrix Trower Frank Marino van Halen SRV were a half step down most of the time.Lower tuning is more droney and flat sounding. On guitar and everything else i prefer 440. I like the brighter sound of the upper harmonics FunMachine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJUSCULE Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 While the article itself wasn't worth my time, I would say that I've heard that pipe organs were tuned to their specific churches' acoustics way back when. Similarly, brass instruments had different tunings based on regional preferences. Maybe someone who knows more about this can chime in. Eric Website Gear page Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana. Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 http://oddculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/the_rules1.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allan_evett Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 I read the article, a while back. Lots of 'reaches' there....Now if there happened to be an actual, scientifically conclusive study, I might consider slight mood affectation being a result of A=432 vs. A=440. Then again, I might not - having spent a portion of misspent youth among some rather superstitious folk. Strangely enough, though: I was attempting to correctly learn the changes to the Todd Rundgren song : "Can We Still Be Friends". Turns out that it's in F minor, and tuned to A432. Go figure.... Must've downloaded the metaphysical version of the youtube app. 'Someday, we'll look back on these days and laugh; likely a maniacal laugh from our padded cells, but a laugh nonetheless' - Mr. Boffo. We need a barfing cat emoticon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Williams Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Once standards began to emerge, there has been a half-millenium trend towards incrementally raising A, to sound brighter. I seem to remember reading of A-435 being a defacto standard in the 19th century. In a "standard" modern A-440 orchestra, the xylophone is normally tuned to A-442 to cut through. Some orchestras have been reputed to raise their standard A to 442, which is close enough (about 8 cents sharp) to use without redesigning your woodwind instruments. I found a semi-interesting blog entry here. -Tom Williams {First Name} {at} AirNetworking {dot} com PC4-7, PX-5S, AX-Edge, PC361 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B3Nut Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 You find a lot of 19th-century pipe organs tuned to A=435. Some Baroque instruments had A=415 tuning. It has changed over the centuries... --- Todd A. Phipps "...no, I'm not a Hammondoholic...I can stop anytime..." http://www.facebook.com/b3nut ** http://www.blueolives.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 The BSO tunes to A442. It is indeed about 8 cents sharp of 440. A440 simplifies the arithmetic for critters with ten fingers. There will probably never be any universal consensus on pitch, tuning, temperament, or much else. So keep the fridge well stocked wIth tuning fluid. I get about 5 cents of WGAF per pint. YMMV. A432 doesn't bother me as much as the pile of BS that comes with it. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steadyb Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Some Baroque instruments had A=415 tuning. Maybe they were just baroquen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesG Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 ColdPlay's piano is tuned to A444, a least on the one tune of theirs I had to learn. What a pain, I had to switch pianos that day. I just couldn't play along being about 10 cents flat, it was like getting stabbed in the face. Hammond: L111, M100, M3, BC, CV, Franken CV, A100, D152, C3, B3 Leslie: 710, 760, 51C, 147, 145, 122, 22H, 31H Yamaha: CP4, DGX-620, DX7II-FD-E!, PF85, DX9 Roland: VR-09, RD-800 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sMatt Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 The BSO tunes to A442. It is indeed about 8 cents sharp of 440. I believe most major US orchestras tune to A=442. The idea is it helps them project that much more in a big hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joegerardi Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 No. US use A440, as does the UK. Europe does use A442 somewhat. If an orchestra needs to pitch sharp to stand out, to me, that's akin to middle age compensating. ..Joe Setup: Korg Kronos 61, Roland XV-88, Korg Triton-Rack, Motif-Rack, Korg N1r, Alesis QSR, Roland M-GS64 Yamaha KX-88, KX76, Roland Super-JX, E-Mu Longboard 61, Kawai K1II, Kawai K4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-missRichardTee Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 No. US use A440, as does the UK. Europe does use A442 somewhat. If an orchestra needs to pitch sharp to stand out, to me, that's akin to middle age compensating. ..Joe Yes to above. What we need is to be in tune, with whatever it might be. You don't have ideas, ideas have you We see the world, not as it is, but as we are. "One mans food is another mans poison". I defend your right to speak hate. Tolerance to a point, not agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-missRichardTee Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Hey OP, I defend your decision to bring this thread to light. It gave me pause to think about what I take for granted. You don't have ideas, ideas have you We see the world, not as it is, but as we are. "One mans food is another mans poison". I defend your right to speak hate. Tolerance to a point, not agreement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wmp Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 A444 is about 16 cents sharp of A440. --wmp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mate stubb Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 it was like getting stabbed in the face. It wasn't from the pitch problem - that stabbing feeling you felt was the "Coldplay effect." Moe --- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.