bluzeyone Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 I've been studying it for a few days and it sounds like a good add to the Juno family. I was just wanting some reviews before I take the trip to demo it. Thanks for your time. "A good mix is subjective to one's cilia." http://hitnmiss.yolasite.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CEB Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 No. But if the keyboard is similiar to the Juno Di then it should have the responsiveness and playability of dog-doo. The last Juno I've seen that was worth owning was the Juno-106. But that is just me. I'm not much on always having the latest gear. "It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne "A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!! So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana. Posted October 7, 2010 Share Posted October 7, 2010 No. But if the keyboard is similiar to the Juno Di then it should have the responsiveness and playability of dog-doo. The last Juno I've seen that was worth owning was the Juno-106. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sven Golly Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Given that the Gi isn't released yet (expected street early November), it's not likely that anyone has seen it. I, however, just chatted with the Roland Canada rep at my local retailer, and played both the Juno Gi and the RD700NX. Short version: the Gi feels MUCH better than the D. Playable, although not as good as, say, the Korg M3 action, but better than the D. Some pretty neat features, as well, especially given the price point. Now, the RD700NX is an absolute killer. Same action as the V-Piano, and some phenomenal sounds. It's got the same sounds as the SUPERnatural expansion, but with more ac.piano models added as well. This thing feels phenomenal though. Definitely on my GAS list now (and it's the very first Roland stage piano to make that list, ever). Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Muscara Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Mr. Golly, Did you ever play the 700GX? If so, what's different about the feel vs. the NX? I know it's PHA II vs PHA III, but I'm not sure what the differences are. "I'm so crazy, I don't know this is impossible! Hoo hoo!" - Daffy Duck "The good news is that once you start piano you never have to worry about getting laid again. More time to practice!" - MOI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sven Golly Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 The NX has the exact same action as the V-Piano. It just feels... better than the GX. Not sure I could quantify it, but it was a very good connection to the instrument that I just didn't seem to get with the GX (although the caveat is that I didn't spend a LONG time on the GX... minutes, not hours... but I only spent the same amount of time on the NX before the rep tossed it back in the bag (well... hefted rather than tossed ) and whisked it back to Roland). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marillo Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Will the piano samples/action be the same in the FP7F as the NX?The FP7F has speakers so if it's as good as Sven is saying I'd be very interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Muscara Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 I wonder if the NX has a better "connection" to the sounds than the GX, like the much-touted connection many have said the CPs have. "I'm so crazy, I don't know this is impossible! Hoo hoo!" - Daffy Duck "The good news is that once you start piano you never have to worry about getting laid again. More time to practice!" - MOI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.