Jump to content


muzines

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by muzines

  1. Thanks Stephen - like I say, we've always been open to help, and are happy to discuss working out a way forward that works for everybody if we can. How do we continue this conversation? (We have a private mu:zines Slack channel and we can set up a Keyboard section and invite yourself and other interested parties along with myself and Mike to discuss, if that would be useful?)
  2. Hey guys, Just checking back in here on this as it's been a while. The last time this was being discussed it seemed that Stephen Fortner and the Keyboard gang were looking at making plans for a Keyboard archive of some description, so I sort of left that alone to see how that would shake out. Obviously it's been a crappy year, but I'm just checking back in to see whether there has been any progress on this, or if any plans are underway, or if there is any news on this? We are pursuing our own personal collection of Keyboard issues in the meantime, but scanning them or any archive work is obviously a no-go at this time, and we certainly don't want to duplicate any effort on this if work is ongoing on this already. Thanks!
  3. Studio running... I didn't mean his rig *now*, I meant his rig *then* on the show, which is what we were discussing...
  4. And now permanent licenses for all the plugins are also available now, which will be good news for some folks.
  5. Heh! Some parts have recently been taken down by BBC Copyright though, by the looks. Note: You could probably ask him about his rig: http://www.alastairgavin.com He's on Facebook as well.
  6. It's probably mostly of his own stuff, and stuff borrowed from other people or companies for the show - or possibly hired. Don't forget that back then, pro keyboard players pretty much needed big rigs, so this kind of thing was common for a working professional in a name band. Knowing how much the BBC paid for BBC2 educational programmes (basically nothing!), no one's itemising the cost of a brand new JX10/CZ1/Memorymoog/MC500/etc on the BBC budget sheet, for sure!
  7. I *loved* Rockschool, taped every episode and watched each one many many times. I pretty much have all the demo tunes burned into my brain, still, after all these years... and I have all the programs here, and revisit them occasionally. It was a unique TV program (still is, in many ways). The Rockschool cast continued to contribute to magazines of the era with regular columns, and you can also find some news, interviews and behind the scenes pieces about Rockschool archived on mu:zines. And hey, I thought Alistair was totally cool, but then I also thought those thin keyboard ties were cool (for a while), so draw your own conclusions... Also in his rig was an MC500, a programmable MIDI patchbay and a rack of SPX90s...
  8. I forgot to come back to this - I don't want to derail this thread away from Keyboard, but I'll just address this briefly: In Roland's case at least, the original publication was called "Roland Newslink", (at least here in the UK) and was printed as inserts into various magazines of the time, usually quarterly. In issues where they were included, I am processing these as article content in the usual way, but I do have a feature request in my issue tracker to find a way to break these out, so you could for example browse "Roland Newslink" as a separate publication. Some of this content was really good, and as a vintage Roland fan, I was keen on including it. I'm not sure offhand if Roland Newslink evolved into the Roland Users Group publication, or if that was something different - it's on my to research list - and I certainly have a pile of Newslinks and other RUG/PowerOn separate issues already scanned here, and it would be good content to archive, but I haven't yet figured out the best way to handle it - thanks for the suggestion. I'll take another look at my notes and if not add it to the (neverending!) list of things to look at. As it was largely Roland marketing material, it seems unlikely there would be much objection to hosting it, but if I get to that point, I'll certainly contact Roland and see, and/or whoever was responsible for the Roland Users Group publication if it was someone other than Roland. Korg ProView I'm less sure about, as I don't personally have any issues. As you say, there is already a good archive of Aftertouch, and it's great that people are working together to archive this stuff and make it accessible, as long as it's done in the right spirit. And as I say on the site, I'm always open to ideas, suggestions, improvements and so on, so feel free to contact me via the site if necessary... And if somebody else has a bunch of these issues and fancies curating a collection and scanning for hosting with us, get in touch! Thanks!
  9. Hi guys, Good to see this discussion here (and thanks for the shout out, Paolo!) Yes, if you weren't aware mu:zines is a non-commercial, labour of love, crowdsourced project to scan, archive and republish UK music tech magazines from the 70s-2000s, including early Sound On Sound, Electronics & Music Maker, Music Technology, and many others. The content is important and deserves to be made available and accessible before it gets lost forever - which is why I've undertaken to do it. Like many people, I was also dismayed when Keyboard mag folded, and hoped for a community project to collect and archive them. At that time it was impractical for mu:zines (ie, me) to do much about it - I already have quite a lot of my plate handling the 1000+ UK issues we are covering. However, in the intervening years, no Keyboard archive project happened, or even looked like it was likely. Also, we started to take on some extra, non-UK publications where there was an opportunity and good reason - for instance we got the permissions from Paia to archive Polyphony, and in just a few weeks completed a full Polyphony archive (as PDFs - we're still working through fully OCR'ing the issues). We also plan to do the same with Synapse, in conjunction with Doug Lynner. Myself and Mike (Magman) have been having discussions about Keyboard off and on for the last few years. And in fact, on my to do list for later this year as a first tentative step was to reach out and contact Keyboard's former editors and owners to see whether they would be open to us doing something similar for Keyboard, and to figure out whether it was feasible, and in what form. (Realistically, I'm not going to be able to OCR and tag everything immaculately in the way I'm doing for the UK mags, as I'm just one guy and it would take the rest of my lifetime to do it - but I'm certainly open to collecting, curating and archiving the issues on mu:zines and am also open to other suggestions as to how to keep this content alive.) Some of the magazines mu:zines covers include former Future-owned publications, and when I contacted Future Publishing some years back they had no problems with us archiving the content, but they had no assets from these old magaziness left and couldn't be of any further help. (Bear in mind at this time these publications were all 20-30 years old, and I wasn't going near considering properties that were still actively being published eg Future Music, for obvious reasons.) I've no idea what Future's attitude would be for the Keyboard content, or even how much they own. Stephen Fortner's post illustrates that this might be a problem, at least for the more recent issues. Older ones may be less of a problem, as they have less commercial value to the publisher. But as you can expect, sometimes these things can be tricky... Note: In most cases, the ownership of the article content tends to (at least in the UK, I'm not as familiar with the way it's handled in the US) revert to the individual authors after a set publication window, so there's often not so much of a problem with publisher permissions, by and large (at least that's my experience, so far). I've not done too much research into US publications to date as, like I say, it's been a bit outside of our remit so far. We're in touch with many of the former publishers, editors and contributors for the magzine content we are archiving and to date everyone I'm in contact with has been impressed and overwhelmingly supportive of what we're doing. For more details about us and how we handle archive content, you can read:- http://www.muzines.co.uk/about http://www.muzines.co.uk/terms http://www.muzines.co.uk/faq Mike (Magman) was the interested party regarding the Keyboard issues - he already has a small collection, but we would be looking to complete the collection, either by acquiring the issues between us, and/or accepting scans from helpful contributors, which has generally worked quite well. The wider the workload spread, the more can be achieved in a small amount of time. In this manner we've been able to nearly complete collections of all the publications we're currently handling. As we are (minimally) donation-supported, we have a very small budget to purchase content, and obviously US issues complicate things in regard to shipping and so on, which is why it's a bit of an extra headache (having people willing to scan their issues would be even more important in this case). It's another reason I've been a bit reticent to commit to starting a Keyboard archive at this time, or even announce any intentions to do so. But who else is going to do it? Maybe it would be enough to scan whatever issues people have to the Internet Archive in a sporadic and unmoderated manner - which would be better than nothing - but less satisfactory if no one is trying to actively fill gaps and curate the collection... But really I think the importance of the publication and content is worthy of better handling than that - and that's certainly the impression I get reading the above posts. In any case - I'm willing to help do *something*, if something can be done. ben@mu:zines
×
×
  • Create New...