Have in mind that was one of my early posts in regards of the MOOG One.
Yes, I guessed it is a "chipsynth" because the Memorymoog already was (CEM 3320, 3340, 3360 OSCs, VCFs & VCAs) and because the reissues of these chipsbecame available for the market this year.
So, for me it was obvious.
Up to now there´s no public info about which components are used for the analog signal path, but meanwhile,- and also because other´s in the forum came up w/ insinuation already,- I got the impression MOOG One is a different synth design than the Memorymoog was.
Now we´ve read about 14.000 + components and up to 16 voicecards, which leaves room for more speculation.
In fact, for it´s price I hope it´s not a "chipsynth" throughout.
A.C.
A little off-topic: The memorymoog had Curtis 3340 oscs, but the filters were real moog ladder filters, one per voice ... not curtis 3320 filter chips.
A nerdy distinction maybe ... but the Moog filters are part of why the MM sounded as sweet as it did.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorymoog
https://www.rosensound.com/2017/11/22/the-memorymoog-setting-the-record-straight/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEM_and_SSM_chips_in_synthesizers
The One clearly sounds different than the MM in the demos so far, more modern Moog-y and not Curtis-like ... which makes sense since the One uses a Moog osc design, not the 3340 reissue.