Jump to content


theshinenz

Member
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About theshinenz

  • Birthday 01/19/2022
  1. I think it will be like the PC4, same OS, better/more chips/memory, but don't think they will re-invent the wheel. Doesn't appear to have fader LED's like the Forte, most likely a Fatar keybed and more sampling ability. I'm happy to stick with my unless there are major changes,
  2. I've got it on my Forte, have been using the pack for a number of years. It was years ago I imported the PC3 file so assume it still all imports fine into PC4 or Forte.
  3. I did the same, had it for about two weeks, but found editing too tedious, if they had an ipad editor for it then I'd consider another one. Scott
  4. Hoping Roland bring Zenology to IOS (Ipad Pro).... would definately purchase, dont want a PC on stage, but an ipad is minimalistic and can also double for lyrics.
  5. Definitely interested in this too, I'm currently running an Ipad 11 Pro, which is pretty good to be honest, but limited with what apps are available. I'd be interested in Ipad Pro running the mini idea though, although wouldn't want an over complicated setup playing live, it looks like you can use a luna display adaptor to go wireless. A newish mac mini with 64gb of RAM I'm sure would run a good amount of VST's at the same time? I really like the Roland Cloud instruments but they are too hard on CPU to really use live.
  6. I'm currently setting up Camelot on Ipad and enjoying it, enjoying it so far. I've had a few glitches, mainly using D1 FM synth. I alos emailed the camelot guys and I'm missing the option for effects and thats apparently coming in the next few month so looking forward to that. I also hope they add inter-app audio as would like to use the Korg apps but currently sticking to mainly TAL-UNO, Poison 202, Synthmaster, Hammond B3-X and Pure Synth which all seem reliable so far.
  7. Awesome cover.... very tight... BUT. What the hell is he wearing?? LOL
  8. If you want the best reliability go with the Yamaha. Its also easier to build performances on. However I find the Forte more rewarding when you dig deeper into programming, more organic and better feel IMO. i'm sticking with Kurzweil but I am lucky enough to have a backup forte in case one breaks down. The montage is more commercial sounding out of the box, but the Kurzweil can achieve most sounds really well with a bit more work.
  9. Just looks like a Platinum to me or another colour rehash... be cool if there was a new one though I doubt it..
  10. If you really must do the comparison thing, from someone who owns both the Forte and Fantom I"d say: Kurzweil is better for: Midi control options Orchestral sounds Vintage flavoured sounds. Better arpeggiator Fantom is better for: User interface Programming sounds from scratch Synth sounds and synth bass sounds Modern sounds / super saws etc Stuff like pianos/eps etc are good on both so really a matter of taste. The kurzweil is more flexible but with that it becomes less user friendly and easier to get tied in knots programming, the Roland much easier to find your way around and quicker to program. The Roland is also better for quick patch selection live which is why I make it the master in my rig. Obviously this is just my opinion and I love both these machines for what they do well.
  11. Update 1.10 coming in the next few hours includes: -Added EXPANSION function for ZEN-Core. -Added a pattern editing function using a piano roll. -Added scene search function. -Added ZONE assign function and playback level function for sample pads. -Added The Noise Suppressor function to the analog filter. -Added switching function at the pattern end. (Pattern Seq) -Added copy function in TR-REC. -Added function to play / stop the target pattern. -Added normalize function to Sample Edit. -Added WAVE EDIT endpoint preview. -Added parameters to ZEN-Core system. -Supported high resolution velocity recording when recording patterns. -Improved the list display when double-tapping, such as a roar name. -Improved tone category button operation on the SCENE SELECT screen.
  12. http://axial.roland.com/category/fantom/?fbclid=IwAR12VAz-1AtKV-Z9Le8cdwR8ufrpFvxK9vCkPFQVbE9cUv3NQ_QfB792GgY Woo hoo!
  13. IMO Trying one in store doesn't give you a true idea of its power. I've owned every workstation there is, and so far Fantom is my favourite. Different strokes I guess, all depends what you use it for. I play covers so for me the UI and being able to emulate a patch very quickly, control external gear all via the Fantom and its sheers quality of sound when going direct to the PA is better than I got from the Kronos or Montage... anything else Roland add to in in future. is going to be a bonus for me. Going back to a Kronos or Montage now after using the Fantom for a couple of months would feel clunky and slow...
  14. Got a bit more info today from the Sud-Claviers video on youtube. I guy on facebook was nice enough to translate some of it. The French Roland Rep confirmed the Fantom has 8 expansion slots, which will be used for Plug-Outs, Axial Sounds & New Filters... look forward to some of these rolling out This is going to be one killer machine in the future.
×
×
  • Create New...