Jump to content


Needskeys

Member
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Needskeys

  • Birthday 02/14/1972
  1. I think more and more people are connecting to computers rather than midi. I use this board mostly to control vsts but I did use the internal piano sound on a gig the other night...and it sounded quite good. I do have to adjust to the action a bit but its only on the occasional chord. If you get too far into the keybed it just doesnt feel quite right. The solution seems to be to move your hand closer to the front of the keys on these chords. Its pretty minor for me but it might be a bigger issue for some.
  2. Yes, I meant the number of buttons/knobs that send midi, referring to using it connected directly to a computer. I did notice that the Numa drawbars did not respond to midi learn from my computer the way other controllers do...although Im no midi expert so maybe I did something wrong. I was trying to make the point that the Numa compares pretty well overall to the nord electro 3, which is a more fair comparison than comparing it to a much more expensive electro 5 or 6. I was saying this because of several comments like, well, its a decent keyboard just dont expect a nord. If you just compare internal sounds then the nord probably wins on organ, and has a slight edge on Rhodes and piano. I think the Numa Wurli is better and the Rhodes and piano arent really too far off. But as you said, comparing as a controller the Numa wins in so many ways.
  3. Rhodes54, yes, you can plug in your Mac and it will output through the left and right outs, and/or the internal speakers. I havent tried it but the phone jack can be used as an auxiliary out. For what its worth, I sold a waterfall 73 key electro 3 to get this and Im happier with this (as a controller). The nord is better at some things, better drawbars and more programmable midi. Hopefully Numa will add more midi control with a firmware update, but theres no guarantee. But the electros in general (waterfall) are just not very good at controlling software acoustic pianos, and their internal pianos are notoriously difficult to amplify, although they seem to excell through larger house systems. But as a controller, the Numa has a bunch of advantages. The keybed is pretty similar to the electro, although I think slightly lighter and less springy which I prefer. I also recommend the 12v battery back mentioned a few pages back. $33 and it will power the 2x for a long time (at least 15-20 hrs).
  4. Im aware that you can run a computer vst through the onboard speakers. Im still wondering if the computer signal is also (or can be) routed through the audio outs, or through the phone jack? Or do you still need a separate audio interface?
  5. Yeah but can you send the audio out to external speakers? I feel like I read that the phone jack could be assigned to do that, but Im not sure.
  6. For those using this to control computer vsts, are you able to use the onboard audio interface or are you still using an external audio interface? Are you able to control vst volume from the keyboard?
  7. Wow the keyscape Rhodes are outstanding! Not sure why they put that super wide tremelo effect on so many of the top presets but its easy enough to change. Im looking forward to trying the acoustic piano on a gig tomorrow but its going to be hard to stay off of the Rhodes patches. The Wing upright is really cool too. Also the clavs and Roland eps are very nice. Great collection!
  8. If you are recording and like to tinker with mics Garritan might be a good choice. I have it, but I havent really connected with it yet in a gig setting. Right now, Pianoteq Bechstein is my #1 for live playing. I have Keyscape coming tomorrow, so Im hoping it will compete. Based on the demos I would definitely like to try Noire, but will try to hold off for a deal. I like that its a smaller file size. The Garritan CFX is a little slow to load. I like to load up several vst combinations on a gig, preferably all loading in around a minute or so. I only have the iOS version of Ravenscroft but Im not sure that demo does it justice. It needs a few tweaks.
  9. I was using a single K8.2. I had the internal sound on briefly while I was loading up computer stuff. The internal sound is nice but the pianoteq sounded better. Normally I probably would have tried it on a couple of tunes but I was playing with some new people including a vocalist (It Might As Well Be Spring In B?!) so I never got around to it.
  10. I played a jazz gig tonight with the Casio s1000 & pianoteq Bechstein. A very enjoyable combination.
  11. Does CinePiano include any 'extended techniques', Felt versions, Una Corda...etc? or it's just a straight forward traditional piano library? Cinepiano (piano in blue) has a tape setting that simulates a recording technique used on jazz recordings from the blue note era. Piano In Blue is a beautiful soulful vst. I enjoy it mostly at home in a quiet environment. For live gigs its not quite as good to me (in cutting through) as some others. Another issue is that it gets rather noisy if you spend much time sustaining around C5 and above. Still its fun to have the piano from Kind Of Blue.
  12. Any chance you might post some audio examples of how the Rhodes and organ sounds after tweaking?
  13. Just ordered Keyscape from MF. You have to call but it is 20% off right now.
×
×
  • Create New...