Jump to content


TomKittel

Member
  • Posts

    785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TomKittel

  • Birthday 11/30/1999

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I asked Studiologic for this feature update. Here is their answer: “we got very few requests of this kind, probably because all internal Sounds already have specific velocity sensitivities according to the type of sounds.” If you like please send a request to info@studiologic-music.com and cc lorenzo.torregiani@studiologic-music.com
  2. Please disregard what I wrote about my favorite Mark I setting. I just found a Mark II setting that made me wet myself. Sounds great with the „normal“ or soft velocity setting. Numa X screenshots attached if you want to try it. These settings pretty much match the sound in this video:
  3. The „soft“ velocity setting plus adding about 10% to 15% key sensitivity brings the Rhodes sounds to live. My favorite is the Mark 1. Not sure which Rhodes version is played in the video. As said before I miss the option to store velocity settings individually in the presets.
  4. Today I installed the Camelot demo version for windows. Just wanted to check it out to maybe later get the iPad version for my live rig. But after fiddling around for more than two hours it seems too confusing for my old brain. I got completely lost between songs, scenes, layers, audio output, midi input and so on... for example I didn't find any possibility to see the GUIs of my VST instruments. After this waste of time the marketing on their website sounds mockery to my ears "Camelot is designed to be intuitive and explored like many other consumer apps." On the other hand I seem to recall that some of you guys are sucessfully using Camelot. So here's the bitter question: am I too stupid? Or should I simply invest a couple of more hours to uncover the Camelot "intuity?"
  5. BTW, none of the Roland cloud synths sounds as good as this. Chapeau!
  6. Yeah, I still own a Juno 2. Some of it’s sounds are really unique. The chorus is one of a kind in particular. The TAL emulation sounds incredibly close as their freebie chorus emulation already did. Thanks for posting this!
  7. No keybed issues here. Still digging my numa x piano 73 after playing it for a couple of months now. My only dislike is the quality of the AP and EP factory presets. Most of them are way too dull for my taste. But this can be changed easily. For live playing I simply turned up tone control of the APs and tried different velocity settings. Also I switched off pedal noise, resonance and duplex. One thing I am missing badly is that velocity settings can’t be saved per program. Velocity can only be set globally. Hope they will fix that in a future update like Yamaha did with the YC series.
  8. one bunny says to another, you have long ears… 🤣
  9. I just didn't remember if the PC3 76 and Artis 7 keybed was TP8 or 9. Point is that back then the Kurzweil folks put customized stiff springs into both keyboards which made them unplayable for quite a few people (including Anotherscott if I remember correctly). In contrast the PC361 had a terrific standard Fatar synth keybed. I don't remember which TP number it was. But I hope Kurzweil will use the PC361 Fatar keybed for the K2061.
  10. Hope that they don’t make a mistake with the 61 keybed like they did with the artis or the pc3 76 which both hat way to stiff springs. I would definitely recommend a Fatar keybed. TP8 or TP9 I think. Leave springs as they are. And USB audio is essential these days.
  11. I can't shake off the impression that it must be down to individual hardware quality and/or settings (velocity, latency, audio interface) if someone finds Pianoteq 8 dreadful. Of course, tastes and preferences are different and there are plenty of great sampled piano options out there. But you can't describe the basic Pianoteq sound metallic or plasticky. By no means. Also, the main benefit of the newer Pteq versions should not be reduced to the superior playability of virtual modelling. By now the basic sound quality is at least on par with most sample pianos I have access to. If you get the settings right, it sounds right. JMTC
  12. Just be careful not to install both versions in the same folder. I renamed the new install folder "Pianoteq 8.2" instead of "Pianoteq 8" where the previous version lives.
  13. Indeed. Out of curiosity I just installed 8.2 next to 8.05 on my notebook. Works! Both versions next to each other are working as they should. So what is the problem?
  14. I agree. The Steinway B sounds spectacular. Together with the wooden keys of my Numa SL88 Grand the playing feel is incredibly authentic. Especially when I close my eyes. A real enrichment of my life, because I could never afford a real Steinway grand piano of this quality. Thank you Pianoteq people!
  15. There is no reason for annoyance. Those who can read have an advantage 😉 Quote from the Pianoteq download page: "Previous versions are still available, in case you encounter any problem with the latest version, click here."
×
×
  • Create New...