Jump to content


pjd

Member
  • Posts

    394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About pjd

  • Birthday 11/30/1999

Converted

  • Location
    Snohomish

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi -- Scroll down to "Other Downloads" on: https://usa.yamaha.com/products/music_production/synthesizers/montage/downloads.html You'll find "MOTIF XF Performances for MONTAGE". Hope this helps -- pj
  2. Thanks for mentioning that! The link is: https://sandsoftwaresound.net/yamaha-p-225-review-its-not-for-me/ I was searching for a piano to have and play at home (i.e., furniture OK). I eventually bought a Yamaha CSP-170 on close-out and I'm pretty happy with it. It's kinda like a furniture P-515 (NWX) with a better sound system. There are still close-out CSPs around -- Yamaha got caught with extra inventory when the world economy tanked. All the best -- pj
  3. Just when I thought it was safe, there's the video from Ujiie-san! 🤩 Nice to see he has the same piles of pens and litter in his studio... I agree, if the street price was lower, they would reel me in. -- pj
  4. Just a thought... You mentioned that a Yamaha PSR-SX900 arranger is available? My suggestion is to use it as a live drum machine. One thing folks miss is that you don't have to use every part (track) in a style. Turn off the tracks you don't want. It's super easy to get rhythm only -- press the ACMP button (turning it off) and all that's left is the rhythm. Then press the ABCD buttons to change pattern within the style or to trigger auto-fill. Some of the PSRs support a foot pedal for pattern (ABCD) changes during performance. I do this when I want to knock off a quick demo and play all of the non-rhythm parts myself. Since the PSR is around, why not give it a try and save money... Hope this helps -- pj
  5. I built one way back when: https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-in-the-house/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-day-one/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-day-2/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-what-went-wrong-day-3/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-testing-midi-part-4/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/crumar-d9u-electro-2-sketch-part-5/ I haven't gotten as much use out of it as I thought, mostly because I prefer built-in controller drawbars. It was a fun project, none the less. All the best -- pj
  6. That would be the NTS-3 KAOSS pad DIY kit. $170 USD (MAP).
  7. Your wish is my command: 😃 https://sandsoftwaresound.net/yamaha-seqtrak-quick-reaction/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/namm-2024-yamaha-seqtrak-ideastation/ I quickly browsed through the SEQTRAK voice and effects list. If someone owns/plays and programs a Montage or MODX, the voices and effects look very familiar. No AN-X? Not much new ground broken, here. Kind of blah. The workflow had better be outstanding or sales are going to be slack. My old AN-200 has AN and AWM, for pity's sake and it's how old? -- pj
  8. I had pictures in October. 🙂 http://sandsoftwaresound.net/the-other-unicorn-in-the-room/
  9. The style developer chooses the drum kit and digital effects to be put on the drums and other instruments. Sometimes the style developer tweaks individual drum sounds like the snare or kick. The Genos (and PSR) ethos is to "sound like the record" out of the box. The "ActionAnthem" style uses the AnalogT8Kit and the new Ambient drums RockKit. The channels are run through the Uni Comp compressor effect and the Ambi kit probably has some level of ambience dialed in. The "OrchRockBallad1" style uses the new OrchTimpani voice and the new Ambient drum DirtyKit. The DirtyKit is going through the newly added multi-band compressor effect. There's lots of sound shaping tools available. I'll grant ya, the Ambi RockKit is largely the old Revo kit with new ambient samples added. Hope this info helps -- pj
  10. I meant to reply earlier -- Oh, well. I spent most of the Fall trying different digital pianos and blogged my opinions. I liked the P-515 and its NWX action: https://sandsoftwaresound.net/yamaha-p-515-i-played-one/ I played it several times and liked it every time. When the P-525 came out, I made a comparison: https://sandsoftwaresound.net/yamaha-p-525-digital-piano-announced/ Still haven't found a P-525 to try. Since I was buying for home, I eventually settled on a CSP-170 Smart Piano (NWX). Gonna be delivered today! 🤪 Yamaha is blowing out the CSP-150 and CSP-170, too. My biggest beef with the P-515 is the lack of secondary voices. I have an MOX and Genos -- come on, Yamaha, stop being so stingy! The CSPs have a lot of good secondary voices. The same voices are available in the P-S500 -- about the same size, weight and price as P-515, but has GHS action. Can't go wrong with any of these instruments -- pj
  11. Hi -- I've written a mess o' articles about MODX and Genos/PSR rotary sim, etc. https://sandsoftwaresound.net/modx-drawbar-control-part-1/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/modx-drawbar-waveforms-part-2/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/modx-drawbar-overdrive-part-3/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/modx-overdrive-slight-return-part-4/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/modx-rotary-speaker-part-5/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/yamaha-modx-gospel-organ/ https://sandsoftwaresound.net/critique-genos-drawbar-organ/ I also play Reface YC. I don't believe Yamaha did anything really special with Reface YC. I can recreate Reface YC on MODX; Genos not so much. It is possible to put overdrive in front of rotary sim on Genos and other mid- to high-end Yamaha arranger keyboards. It takes a little effort to work around the "Organ Flutes" routing and the effect order may not be "correct", i.e., overdrive after rotation. Like others, I'm tired of Yamaha botching this up. Leaving the VCM rotary sim out of a $5,700 premium keyboard is a SIN and killed the Genos2 value proposition for me. I'm looking to ditch Reface YC in favor of Hammond M-Solo. At 72, I might die before Yamaha gets this right. Yeah, I'm that PO'ed. Good on ya 🙃 -- pj
  12. That "32" in "FAT32" is significant. Microsoft limited the FAT32 partition size in order to drive people to NTFS. I'll let The Google take over from here. 😀 -- pj
  13. Late to the Live Set party, but here is a picture of the first page in my church Live Set. Why all the "PJ"? I create and edit almost everything. At the very least, I dial down the reverb. Our church has enough natural reverberation and I don't need to muddy things up. So, in order to track all of my own Performances, I tag the name with "PJ". My church Live Set goes to three pages roughly in the order of necessity and frequency of use. Page one gets a lot of action. Hope this helps -- pj
  14. BTW, arrangers are quite common as so-called professional instruments in many parts of the world. It ain't no accident that a large number of styles are "schlager". I remember getting blissfully drunk outdoors in Erlangen watching and listening to schlager. 🙂 In South Africa, I watched a street kid rock the s--t out of a beat-up old arranger. It's a privilege to have what I have... Peace -- pj North America is an arranger desert.
  15. Thanks for saying nice things about the blog, Scott. The compute and tone generation core is very similar between the mid-/upper-end synths and arrangers. Differences are largely due to display(s), choice of keybed, front panel gizmos (plus gizmo scanning), digital audio handling and amplification system. Parts is parts, but a large part of the base cost is software and content (digital assets). Without tipping my hand about night-time activities, you would be shocked at the sheer number of digital assets in one of these products. (Same can be said for video games). That's why Yamaha and other manufacturers reuse waveforms like crazy across product lines. The synths and arrangers are voiced differently by the sound designers. More cost. Styles are not that easy to develop. [I've tried my hand at this.] The MAINs and FILLs need to be versatile. The musically complicated INTROs and ENDINGs need to strongly suggest popular songs without stepping on copyright. Some folks here know this problem -- The director/producer throws you a temp track and says "I want it to sound like this." Good luck avoiding infringement. 🙂 The arrangers and synths have separate, unique code bases due to their unique functionality/UI. The synthesis software layers are definitely different, too. In Genos, Yamaha created a product with the expectation that it will lead all other product lines. Part of the Genos selling price is the non-recurring expense of producing the next Genos. Thus, Genos funds a lot of advanced development (and research) in the Yamaha Digital Musical Instrument division. Yikes, this response has gotten way too long -- pj Music technology blog: sandsoftwaresound.net
×
×
  • Create New...