Jump to content


Rusty Mike

Member
  • Posts

    971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Rusty Mike

  • Birthday 11/30/1999

Converted

  • occupation
    Semi-retired IT Dude
  • Location
    Central NJ

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just going to clock in to say that I recently bought the EV Everse 8 speaker to test out for live use. I know keyboard players are not the target market for this product, but the <17 lbs. and EV sound quality had a lot of appeal. The goal was to reduce my carry weight with a lighter alternative to the QSC K8.2. I carry my whole rig in a single trip: piano, stand, speaker and gear bag. So far I've used it at a few rehearsals and a gig with my big band, and it sounds great. It handles the picky Nord piano samples very well and provides a rounder tone compared to the QSC K8.2. Projection and volume are excellent as well. Usable DSP and can manage it from your phone/tablet. The battery thing is a plus for buskers I guess. I just put my pair of K8.2's up for sale as a result.
  2. I apologize for not being clearer, and for not understanding the questions. I interpreted Dr. Mike's multitrack question as recording multiple tracks (different instruments) into the DAW at the same exact time. Of course the DAW plays multiple tracks simultaneously; I guess I misinterpreted the term "multitrack". The bottom line is that I just want to reduce the clutter. The mixer sits on a little bench below the work desk, and the access is not great. I don't like that all the cables plug into the top of the mixer, and then hang down over the back, which stresses the connections on both the cables and the jacks. Right now they run into a raceway hanging below the desk and above the mixer, but if I want to move the mixer to the top of the desk, either the cables hang down or I need to buy/build some sort of management. In addition, the desk is just not be enough for the KeyLab controller and the mixer. While the patch bay has been useful, it all just seems overkill for a relatively simple setup. It's just too many cables, and I'd like to take the mixer and the patch bay out of the picture if possible. I have three sound sources (two hardware instruments and a computer) and two pairs of monitors. Sometimes I just play these instruments by themselves into the monitors, and sometimes I want to play a VST instrument. There are times I want to record the audio from one of these instruments into my DAW, times when I want to record a VST track into the DAW, and times when I want to have a MIDI track in the DAW play one of the hardware instruments. Finally, I want to use the DAW to mix audio tracks. I simply had the idea that using an interface with multiple inputs would be a simpler and neater way to address my uses. I'm not sure I can state this any simpler. I asked here to see if this idea has some merit or what other people did in their studios. It's not about wanting to be different or the same. It's about simplifying a hobbyist's workspace. Mr. Rivers I appreciate your response that validates my idea about the multichannel interface. Reading the manuals and watching a few videos on the products supports that. Thank you.
  3. I'm not really interested in multi tracking into the computer; I tend to record a track at a time. I'm just looking to simplify the setup by taking an item (the mixer and possibly the patchbay) out of the equation. I figured with a limited number of sound sources a mid-size interface will work just fine, and I can seriously reduce the number of cables and complexity. I'm sure I can adapt my workflow to manage signal routing through the interface. It looks like both products can store a configuration as default so I can play an instrument without the computer running. Podcasting is not part of my repertoire at all. The LiveTrak stuff looks nice, but I'm not the target buyer for that product. The KeyLab mkII works just fine as a control surface and it's already on my desk. Besides, like I said, I'm trying to downsize the bulk. There are occasions where I would like to play back a mix to my bandmates during a Zoom call, but I'm sure I have the equipment and ability to do that - it's just a matter of learning. Kuru: "It's important to get the Engineer out of the room as soon as possible so the Artist can get something done" - sage words indeed. When doing a reconfiguration like this, I do a lot of planning. The goal is to make the workflow as intuitive as possible so the Artist get be creative and not worry about how to get something to work. The current setup works just fine, but I want to reduce the clutter and improve the ergonomics.
  4. Another fan of the CT-S300. Sounds decent enough through headphones. The action is better than you'd expect and way better than the Yamaha MX series.
  5. Reviving this thread to hopefully get some decision making clarity. I'm some months off from actually making a purchase, as we will be moving late spring into new digs. Over the years, I've shed equipment, gotten more into home studio recording, but have gone pretty seriously in-the-box. I'm down to three sound-generating instruments: Roland RD-800, Nord Electro 6 and Nord Stage 2EX. The Stage is primarily a rehearsal/gig box, and sees very little studio time. All other sound is done using soft instruments on my 2020 iMac 27" through a Steinberg UR22 (1st gen) interface. All I/O is routed through a Behringer Ultrapatch Pro PX3000: sound sources connect to the A channels and route out the B channels to a Mackie 1202 VLZ4 mixer. I have two pairs of monitors: older iKey Audio (now Gemini) M-808v2 and Presonus Eris E5. They are connected to the mixer's Main and Ctrl Rm outputs respectively via patch points. The only exception is the RD, which is directly connected to the mixer w/ XLR cables. I have found them to have less noise than the TS/TRS connections. Cubase Elements is my DAW, and Kontakt and Arturia V-Collection 7 are the primary virtual instruments. When I want to record audio from the RD or Stage, I patch from the patch bay into the audio inputs on the UR22. It's rather rare that I do this, as most of the recorded tracks come from the VSTs. I have a few microphones, but almost never use them for home studio recording, at least right now. I'd like to reserve the right to do so in the future. Also, this is personal studio space, and not a room where I bring in a band to record; expandability and a super amount of flexibility is not a requirement. Since I'm down to only three sound sources, I'd like to explore taking the mixer out of the picture and replacing it with a multi-input interface that will allow me to route audio. Removing the mixer will help reduce the cable count and make for a more aesthetically pleasing environment. Something about the top-mount of the cables on the Mackie just seem to bug me, and lead me to think about the weight strain on the cable ends. I plan to keep both pairs of monitors. Here are the use cases: 1. Simple practice/playing Some days, I just want to flip on the RD or Electro and play through one of the speaker pairs without the computer. So the interface should have some sort of stored or default setting that will just route audio to the outputs. 2. Practice/playing using VSTs Use the RD, Electro or Arturia Keylab 61 to control a soft instrument, again routed through either speaker pair. 3. Recording/playback with the DAW I need the flexibility to record from any of my sources into Cubase, and again to route out to either monitor pair. Using the software to route instrument signals into he DAW would be a new experience for me to get use to, but I'm sure I could learn just fine. These are not atypical scenarios I'm sure. I obviously need at least 6 inputs, two of which are XLR. Since two XLRs would be dedicated to the RD, it would be nice to have an additional pair for mics in case I need them. Given this, I've been looking at interfaces with at least 4 XLR inputs, 4 additional line inputs and 4 output ports. While I don't have a set idea of budget, I do not need high end as I'm only doing this as a hobby. Also, I've had a good experience w/ the UR22, and it would be nice to stick with Steinberg, but that is not a hard requirement. I'd also prefer a USB 3.0 or USB C connection. So the first question really is: is this a common use in a home studio where the interface serves as a small mixer? Second, the initial research shows two product popping to the top: Focusrite Scarlette 18i8 and the Presonus Studio 1810c. The Steinberg UR816c is at a slightly higher price point. I'm wondering: a) Should I be looking at other models or alternatives? b) what are people's impressions with the quality/usability of the controller software? b) ease of software integration with Cubase? Hopefully this rambling made sense. Thanks
  6. Just upgraded the Arturia Stage 73 V and Jup-8 V. I did not bite on V-Collection 8 when the upgrade was offered over VC-7, but recently discovered I was eligible to upgrade these two instruments for $29 each. When I went to purchase, some coupon was applied and it actually cost me less than $30 for both! The Rhodes is a huge turnaround. The prior version was pretty much unplayable, lacking dynamics and agreeable sound. The new version is a whole new instrument that is a joy to play. As for the Jupiter, I did the upgrade because of the price and the accolades it's received here. I've never been a Jupiter user and really have no attachment to it, so it will take a while to get to know it and how best to use it.
  7. Sorry Eric, unfortunately I do not. It was a long time ago and I never thought about taking pictures for posterity. The 1/4" plywood fit well into the spaces used by the original plastic lid. The sides were straight upright, while the front and back were angled to match the original lid. It was tall enough to clear the harp but low enough to be packed with the lid. It was painted black. To an audience it was effectively invisible.
  8. Back in the 70"s I built a flat-top replacement lid for my Mark I Stage. It was made from 1/4' plywood and fit very well. I seem to recall adding a strip or sheet of copper to the inside of the lid to reduce some of the hum, but I don"t remember the details. Prior to that I made a DIY stacker frame, also from wood. It straddled the wooden case of the piano and didn"t put any pressure on the plastic lid at all.
  9. I'll toss in the Waldorf Blofeld. Pretty rich sounding, multitimbral small form factor. Used units abound, and even new models are decently priced.
  10. Rendition of Autumn Nocturne recorded with the help of my sax player friend. Every song is a learning experience, and this was largely an exercise in getting to know Kontakt 6 and making a simple string arrangement. Autumn Nocturne on SoundCloud Yea, I got a thing for jazz standards.
  11. Adam Neely did a YouTube breakdown of the arrangement. I thought it was pretty cool. Yea there was a wee bit of a cheese factor there, and it"s a struggle to make that song unique. I did enjoy some of the reharms in this rendition.
  12. Every single one I ever owned, each for various reasons. The Sequential Pro One was my first real synth. I cut my programming teeth on it. It opened up the world of synthesis to me and taught me the principles and nuances. Juno 60 was my first programmable poly. Helped me learn just how far one could go with a single oscillator. I also learned a lot about using synthesis to emulate other natural sounds. That instrument took my knowledge pretty far. Next up was the Oberheim Matrix 6. It taught me a lot about using velocity, aftertouch and release velocity, and all the great expressive things I could do with it. PITA to program but the results were always worth it. Absolutely loved that thing, and spent many hours programming it. I think a couple of my patches actually made it into the Matrix 1000 preset collection. Ensoniq SQ-80 followed that. Opened up the world of using waves and all the sonic possibilities. Also taught me about sequencing. Very efficient workflow and polyphonic aftertouch! What a wonderfully rich instrument. I also owned a DX-7, but only out of commercial pressure. Didn't do much with that aside from cribbing other people's programs. Digital synthesis didn't really interest me. After that, I took a break from playing, and upon my return, I had less interest in synthesis. I did own a PC3 for a few years, but was more interested in the controller and performance-related aspects of it and less so the synthesis architecture, so I'm not sure that counts in this thread. Just starting to explore again now in the home studio, but it's too early to tell.
  13. I just listened to the video. The owner"s rationale is certainly legitimate, particularly when he spoke about teachers referring students to the site for education and reference and were embarrassed to refer to it by name. In that context, I get it.
  14. He certainly wasn't alone in that regard! Most big band piano charts are way too busy. His wonderful arrangements will endure. I've played countless charts of his. Love every minute of them.
×
×
  • Create New...