Jump to content


spokenward

Member
  • Posts

    797
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About spokenward

  • Birthday 05/24/1954

Converted

  • occupation
    archival projects
  • Location
    IL US

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think that the messaging on these mixers is slightly sideways. I think that if you squint you can see an SD card logo and a DSD logo. Analog? The model number seems to follow the Korg / Greg Mackie / Peter Watts colab ID.
  2. Like everything in audio there will be controversies along the way and I don't think that this a one-way path beyond 24 bit. In the video he documents a notable dip in the response that is at an impossibly low level. Somebody will figure out what that sounds like. The application of this 32 bit tech though is valuable for the film and video people who don't get a callback if there is an unfixable problem with the audio. I see it as being valuable, but the value is more apparent to markets other than the home studio. Our duty is to please our ears and not to explain to dozens of people that they can't go home yet because the sound guy needs another take. Or the video and streaming audio that was live-mixed with fubared channels and can't be cleaned up for broadcast or upload.
  3. Yes, agreed 32 bit, but it is more ambitious and more powerful than the "one up - one down" approach of earlier field recorders. Julian Krause did a video 3 years ago on another Zoom 32 bit no-levels device. https://youtu.be/NTuJ1fk3PsY that he refers to but did not link. In the new video he is just speculating from the topology that the 4 channel DACs are mediated by an ARM controller chip and splitting high level signal and low level signal. That's a lot more powerful than the safety recording approach, even though the metaphor is similar. Here's the bit at (03:14).
  4. I did not realize that the Ableton Link support had grown to this level. https://www.ableton.com/en/link/products/ Even the Sonic Pi that Craig was pointing to here: can share the Link metronome.
  5. Ableton introduced their iOS Note app without midi input. It seemed nearly useless. Except maybe as a conversation starter at train stops. "Yes, I'm a producer..." Now they have added midi input. People will be happiest with it if they are into Bluetooth LE MIDI or Ableton Link. So update.
  6. I don't disagree, but they had a long reach. Something about it reminded me of "Red's Piano". He seems to remember the bends and slides as kind of a signature too. Moving on. TV seems more likely.
  7. There are some ancient Windows and Dos utilities mounted on this page. So you will need an old computer and probably and old computer wizard to make this work. https://kurzweil.com/mark_10-110-150/ see the area for: ‘EXPORT’ SMF Conversion Utility (Converts .SNG song files into the .MID SMF format) The SMF is a standard midi file. They also have manuals for your keyboard series on that page. Sweetwater also has this brief note that led me to the Kurzweil page. https://www.sweetwater.com/sweetcare/articles/load-mark-6-8-10-110-songs-another-sequencer/ good luck!
  8. Have you gone through NRBQ catalog for the period that you are thinking of? (This probably only applies if you were in a college radio market. NRBQ catalog is mostly worth a sidetrip.)
  9. I think there is a ruthless math to all trade shows regardless of industry. The calculation weights the number of doors that address the consumer, the innovation still to be discovered in the product and the profitability left in the sales channel. When any one of those elements is up there is more trade show spending and engagement.
  10. I divide them by my temporary enthusiasms. Your project sounds similar to thoughts that I have had but that I have not yet put in place. I keep a Zoom H2N pretty handy. I don't have the Akai and the Eurorack, but I have been assembling a more software-centric group of tools for stretching, repitching, warping, and granular fun. I have been assuming that I would mount these samples on disks attached to a single-board computer like a Raspberry Pi (they've been scarce lately but I have an RPi 4 with 8GB). The commitment is a microSD card that can be swapped out when I want to do something else with the box. Jürgen Moßgraber's sample conversion utilties are updated and expanded on a regular basis. There is Linux support with that. https://www.mossgrabers.de/Software/ConvertWithMoss/ConvertWithMoss.html I'm not entirely sure that I want to head down the SFZ rabbit hole with all of this but it is pretty mature. And again there is Linux support on many of the projects. https://sfzformat.com/software/tools/
  11. I found this very candid conversation regarding his film work. https://www.thefader.com/2015/12/04/ryuichi-sakamoto-interview-the-revenant But what I was really looking for was a statement of his philosophy on repetition. He uses it like breathing. It's the same but it's not quite the same. I kept going back to this one over the last year.
  12. This is a 4 screenshot illustration of the Android Phone Bing app. If you read the screens on this one it turns out pretty well. It's helpful and brief and it is mostly correct. Notably the app does not use the Tabs feature of the desktop. So the punchline is the last exchange - 'How do I save this chat?' That's why we have the screenshots.
  13. Correct, I was using the Bing app on Pixel Android, not the desktop. My Google searches were in Chrome. I have one desktop machine with Edge only. I will try the Bing features there. I was beta on Google too. I just got the invite to Bard.
  14. I'm pretty sure that Metheny synth patch started as a Toots Thielemans tribute. I think he liked the reedy, inhaling, exhaling endless quality of the line. It makes sense to me based on the length of his melodies so I am willing to cut him some slack.
  15. Okay, I opened the app again this AM. You do have to set the level of precision by engaging with the "Let's chat" invitation. I had a query and a followup. The restatement of my query in their format is the best part of their tech. You know if and how they understood the query. The "pretty printing" with footnotes pretends to be a little smarter than it is. (I mean, footnotes, only smart people know footnote rules. My first instinct is to judge the quality of their sources and I was not overly impressed.) I got an answer to my query in three tries with the Goog by using their Tools menu to limit responses to the last 24 hours. When I reopened the Bing app on my phone my two previous queries were not waiting for me. They had junked up the feed with News and Trending and more noise. So I am a knowledgeable user of one kind of search and a beginning user of another. But one kind of search tells me that I am smart and the other tries to convince me that they are smart. It's kind of a ragged interaction so far, like finding the sales rep at retail who knows more about the service plan than the product.
×
×
  • Create New...