Music Player Network Home Guitar Player Magazine Keyboard Magazine Bass Player Magazine EQ Magazine
Page 1 of 1 1
Topic Options
#1783377 - 07/18/07 01:58 AM Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument
Chip Curtis
Senior Member


Registered: 12/15/03
Posts: 153
Loc: Willamette Valley Oregon

Offline
I use Cubase SX3 with Waves Platinum plugins among others. I am looking for advise as to what plugins you guys use and in what order/bus per instrument.
Thanks, Chip

Top
#1783427 - 07/18/07 07:13 AM Re: Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument [Re: Chip Curtis]
audiorulez
Gold Member


Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 548

Offline
Use what the track calls for. Typcially eq (cut what you have too much of rather than boosting what's missing), maybe some compression. There are no rules of order, however I typically put dynamics before eq, as eq changes will affect the dynamics.

Crutial to any recording is to get the recorded sound going in right when tracking, not trying to fix in the mix.

Top
#1783446 - 07/18/07 08:37 AM Re: Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument [Re: audiorulez]
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
10k Club


Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 12335
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA

Offline
And just to echo that it's a per/song, per/person thing, and to show how everyone is different... \:\)

I usually EQ before any compression.
The thinking is...if your track has any bloated low end or an overly spiky upper mid, or is just a bit unbalanced across it's frequency spectrum...etc...those irregularities can/will trigger the compressor to maybe react when you don't expect/want it to.

By first EQ-ing the track and getting it to sound as balanced as possible EQ-wise...and then compressing, the compressor will work on a broader frequency spectrum of that track, rather than being falsely triggered by some outstanding EQ elements.

Of course...some people will use EQ intentionally to trigger specific compression a specific times...like using the thump of the kick drum to drive a compressor that is compressing the bass guitar so that both instruments “lock” better to each other…
…though that's a more specialized use of compression.


Edited by miroslav (07/18/07 08:46 AM)
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com

"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."

Top
#1783467 - 07/18/07 09:24 AM Re: Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument [Re: miroslav]
audiorulez
Gold Member


Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 548

Offline
 Originally Posted By: miroslav
I usually EQ before any compression.
The thinking is...if your track has any bloated low end or an overly spiky upper mid, or is just a bit unbalanced across it's frequency spectrum...etc...those irregularities can/will trigger the compressor to maybe react when you don't expect/want it to.

By first EQ-ing the track and getting it to sound as balanced as possible EQ-wise...and then compressing, the compressor will work on a broader frequency spectrum of that track, rather than being falsely triggered by some outstanding EQ elements.


One of many reasons why it's important to take the time to Crutial to get the recorded sound going in right when tracking, not trying to fix in the mix. For me, I'm constantly listening while tracking, and at the end of a tracking session, using nothing more than pan and volume, I do rough mixes for clients for them to review.

I never even turn on any eq until the mix stage. I take the time to get the right mic in the right place, tune the source and put it in the right acoustic environment, so the recorded track needs little to sit properly in the mix.

Top
#1783504 - 07/18/07 10:29 AM Re: Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument [Re: audiorulez]
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
10k Club


Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 12335
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA

Offline
I never EQ going in either.
And...it's not a question of "fixing" it in the mix…rather it’s about sweetening the mix.

When mixing, we all apply some form of EQ to each track in order to get it to sit in the mix properly...even if those tracks were recorded without any EQ and sounded good at the time of tracking.
When you start tracking…and you only have the basic rhythm tracks down…it’s hard to make all your tone decisions against that sparse track count.
Final adjustments are usually made after ALL the tracks have been recorded…. ;\)

It is during the mixing process that I prefer to compress AFTER I've settled on my EQ choices...and then I know that I am compressing the whole track...evenly...as desired.
Often...it is a back-and forth process with EQs and Comps when you are fine-tuning a mix...though my use of EQ and compression is relatively benign to the overall mix, and it's done to sweeten things...not fix things.

That said...I know some people who DO like to use a Comp almost as an equalizer...and they will shape the tone of the track with their Comp settings.
If that works in your mix...fine.

Again...the central theme here is that there are NO set rules about which processing to use and in which order…or when/how much to use. It’s a per-song, per-person thing. \:\)
Heck, before applying ANY processing just see how far you can get the mix going with only basic level/pan settings...then use EQ/Compression/Reverb to enhance that basic mix.
At least that’s how I like to do it...though I know some people feel the need to string out as many plug-ins as their DAW permits...on every track.


Edited by miroslav (07/18/07 10:31 AM)
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com

"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."

Top
#1784074 - 07/19/07 12:51 PM Re: Plugin Order/Fav's per instrument [Re: miroslav]
audiorulez
Gold Member


Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 548

Offline
 Originally Posted By: miroslav
I never EQ going in either.
When mixing, we all apply some form of EQ to each track in order to get it to sit in the mix properly...even if those tracks were recorded without any EQ and sounded good at the time of tracking.
When you start tracking…and you only have the basic rhythm tracks down…it’s hard to make all your tone decisions against that sparse track count.
Final adjustments are usually made after ALL the tracks have been recorded


NO, we do not ALL do this. While it's generally true that tracks benefit from some eq during the mix, I often find that tracks recorded well do not require eq, or nothing more than a hp or lp filter to sit well.

Proper preproduction is the key. Knowing what you are looking for before you begin tracking, rather than groping in the audio dark can be a huge benefit to getting great tracks from the beginning.

Top
Page 1 of 1 1


Moderator:  FoxTick, Bunny Knutson 
Hop to:
Support Your Forums