#1743608 - 04/29/07 11:24 PM
Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
|
thanksforhelpethan
Senior Member
Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 101
Loc: los angeles
|
Offline
|
|
Ok so I need a a/d converter with atleast 8 channels. I need to to work with my digi 001 and with pro tools so that I can get 16 simultainious inputs.
My price range is 200-750... inless something is significantly better for a little more.
I care most about the quality of the connections, 48khz is fine because thats all i record in anyways. My main concern is I want the best sound, this isnt being used for mics its being used for a Akai MPC and a korg triton Keyboard.
Thanks for the suggestions guys :).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1743972 - 04/30/07 02:53 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: thanksforhelpethan]
|
J.J. Blair
Senior Member
Registered: 07/22/05
Posts: 326
Loc: Hollywood, CA
|
|
Offline
|
|
8 channels or preamp and A/D for $750? I don't know if quality is going to be something you can count on for that amount, I'm sorry to say. You can't even find quality preamps w/o the converters for that much money.
I know that Presonus makes a box that might suit your needs. It's a single rack space unit that has eight channels of pres, comps and A/D IIRC. I used it once and wasn't thrilled about the headroom of S/N ratio, but it might suit your needs.
_________________________
Friends don't let friends act like rockstars.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744156 - 04/30/07 07:33 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: J.J. Blair]
|
Mike P
Member
Registered: 02/02/06
Posts: 27
Loc: Hollywood, CA
|
|
Offline
|
|
I don't understand. If you're using a Akai MPC and a Triton, why are you wanting to record them as audio tracks? I would think that you'd be using them as Midi devices and create midi tracks in Pro Tools. Unless you're mixing entirely in the box, I guess.
Why 8 preamps? It would probably be better to get a high quality 2 channel converter and do 2 tracks at a time.
Why not just get a Mackie 1604, run your audio out of the Digi 001, drive your MPC & Triton through midi and spread your outputs to the Mackie?
Edited by Mike P (04/30/07 07:35 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744197 - 04/30/07 08:37 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: Mike P]
|
thanksforhelpethan
Senior Member
Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 101
Loc: los angeles
|
|
Offline
|
|
Well Mike I am wanting to send my songs i make on the mpc and triton into pro tools to be mixed down and saved. Then to also add vocals and some plug in effects too. I am very green at sound engineering so if thats not the way to do it I am all ears.
As for getting a good 2 channel and just sending each sound in seperately, how hard is it to get them to all sync together perfect? I would imagine its very easy using bar and tempo time, but i dont know how.
As for why I wanted 8 converter channels more. My mpc has 10 outputs the triton 6, and I just wanted to be able to stream the entire song at once. Mostly because itll be easier, but its also the only way I know to have all the tracks perfectly sync up.
I am all ears to learn though.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744229 - 04/30/07 10:11 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: thanksforhelpethan]
|
Mike P
Member
Registered: 02/02/06
Posts: 27
Loc: Hollywood, CA
|
|
Offline
|
|
In that case, I'd definitely purchase a mixer like a Mackie 1604 VLZ (any incarnation should be fine in your price range).
Are you assigning instruments/sounds to each of the MPC's 10 outputs and the Triton's 6? That's quite a bit of separation there. I'm not saying that's it's not needed, I'm just trying to understand your logic.
If it were me, I'd record all your music in Pro Tools via Midi and send that data to the MPC & the Triton. When working with drum machines, I would generally assign the kick & snare to mono channels, the toms to a stereo pair (or two individual channels panned L-R) and the cymbals to another stereo pair (or two individual channels panned L-R). That would take up six channels on the Mackie (maybe eight, if you were to assign some percussion or special effects to another two channels). That would leave an additional 8 channels for the a combination of the Korg & any audio tracks from Pro Tools.
At that point, you would be mixing audio from the 001 (via the analog audio outs) along with the midi tracks from your MPC & Korg. From there, you can record the entire song back into Pro Tools using the Main Mix outs on your Mackie into two analog inputs on your 001.
Edited by Mike P (05/01/07 10:21 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744464 - 05/01/07 12:10 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: Mike P]
|
thanksforhelpethan
Senior Member
Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 101
Loc: los angeles
|
|
Offline
|
|
Yes I am assigning different sounds/instruments to each output on the triton and mpc. Although on the triton I cant put each instrument on a serparate output because I use around 10 instruments usually. So I do need to group some, sometimes.
One big problem I have with doing it via a physical mixer as your talking about is that I cannot go in and make changes once its recorded. In order to do that I will have to record the thing all over again. If I send everything on separate tracks into pro tools I can mix it inside the box easily.
If its nessicary I can wait a bit to buy a 16-24 channel a/d converter. If I have to I geuss I can spend 2-4 grand on one. I just want one with good headroom and great sound quality. I geuss w/e I have to spend to get a good one I will do it.
Edited by thanksforhelpethan (05/01/07 12:10 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744545 - 05/01/07 02:21 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: thanksforhelpethan]
|
Mike P
Member
Registered: 02/02/06
Posts: 27
Loc: Hollywood, CA
|
|
Offline
|
|
One big problem I have with doing it via a physical mixer as your talking about is that I cannot go in and make changes once its recorded. In order to do that I will have to record the thing all over again. If I send everything on separate tracks into pro tools I can mix it inside the box easily.
You can remix the song at any time. You'd have all your Midi sequences in Pro Tools and your audio files in Pro Tools. All you'd be doing to mix is running everything through the mixer back to 2 channels in Pro Tools. If you wanted to change levels or effects, you'd just remix the song at any time.
Personally, I think it would be a total waste of money to spend 4k-5k on Apogee convertors just to record Midi instruments. But that's your call.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1744735 - 05/01/07 08:57 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: Mike P]
|
Mihaly
Member
Registered: 09/13/06
Posts: 8
Loc: Melbourne Australia
|
|
Offline
|
|
There must be something I don't understand here. I am assuming that the MIDI tracks are being played from teh computer that you are recording the audio on.
It seems to me that you could record one virtual instrument at a time into two audio channels (or one if the audio is mono). Enable only one instrument on the first pass and arm one track for record, then the next one on the second and so on. You will have to do a little switching of cables for different physical instruments and may have to change the routing of virtual instrument to physical output on the physical instrument. I have done this on my set up when I wanted to record each drum part to a different track.
The audio will be in synch, aside from the typical MIDI latencies, which will only differ between differewnt physical instruments (and will be small/inaudible anyway).
So, I think you only really need a two channel. The only complication I might see is if the drum machine doesn't make it easy to mute seperate parts (snare/ kick/OHs etc.) In which case you would need to edit the midi drum track to separate tracks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1750023 - 05/12/07 05:36 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: Mihaly]
|
thanksforhelpethan
Senior Member
Registered: 06/07/06
Posts: 101
Loc: los angeles
|
|
Offline
|
|
Yeah for now I am just working with my digi 001 which has a total of 8 inputs. But I am still doing it as audio and not midi. No problems yet but soon enough I will start experimenting with midi tracks on pro tools too, but for now I am just doing it audio signals.
As for the mute thing Mihaly, the Akai MPC is a really amazing drum machine muting seperate tracks or pads is just a single button its no biggy. Come to think of it the MPC is the best drum machine I have ever seen.
For now I am content with my current equip... but down the road I am sure I'll want more equip lol. I'm just like a crackhead buying rocks... I can always use a little more :D.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1807738 - 09/10/07 05:40 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: thanksforhelpethan]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
The M-Audio Octane runs for around $600, and is exactly what you're looking for; 8 pres with lightpipe connectivity to the 001.
Bypass the 001 pres and converters, it's pretty common knowledge they suck. If you must use them, use them for secondary tracks, not primary, and use the Octane outs for monitoring. You'll be amazed at the difference between that and the monitor outs through the 001's crappy converters.
If you're recording only audio for CD, stick with 44.1k sample rate, and skip the downsampliing from 48k.
Best of luck.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1817427 - 09/29/07 11:54 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
audiofreek
Gold Member
Registered: 05/09/01
Posts: 503
Loc: Prince George,,CANADA
|
|
Offline
|
|
If you're happy at 48K sampling rate,and are looking for a good quality used digital mixer.You can probably pick up a Panasonic DA7 with an ADAT lightpipe card for about $1,000.00 or less.
You'ld get better AD and DA conversion,16 preamps,and have a total of 18 inputs for yor synths.I think Craig Anderton may still be using his DA7/001 set-up.
Rick
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1818433 - 10/02/07 07:54 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiofreek]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
The 001 won't do anthing higher than 48K.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823141 - 10/11/07 09:11 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
BrianK
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/00
Posts: 228
Loc: Los Angeles,CA,UNITED STATES
|
|
Offline
|
|
I like that you are doing audio tracks, not MIDI. That's different and different is GOOD - it makes you have a style that is not like everyone else. Just because you don' hav MIDI editing power, you are having to do things the hard way - but I find the hard way makes you a better person, better player, etc. etc.
But you mentioned not being able to make changes - this is also the hard way! You could so a whole remix if you have to, just do it. I find the concept of "I can redo this and this and this little bit" TOO MUCH TROUBLE. Just do a mix, do a good one, and let it go. If you need another, go back and do another. It will com out different each time.
_________________________
Relax and float downstream...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823153 - 10/11/07 09:26 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: BrianK]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
If you use Midi tracks you can easily make changes at any time. Recording audio tracks off the synths would not permit that, you'd need to go back and record the audio again off the synths.
The simple solution is a decent mixer and to record your synth tracks midi until you are finished mixing. Then, if you feel you must, record the audio tracks from them for archive individually.
You can do this with the 001's 8 analog inputs, since they will all sync via midi anyway.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823543 - 10/12/07 06:00 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
The thing that is bad about using virtual tracks mixed in with audio tracks...is if you ever need to go back to those mixes in a year or two...and you no longer have that synth module...or you no longer have the right synth patches...etc... ..and now, you are sitting there trying to reprogram your virtual synth patches to sound like what you had before. Good luck! 
Precisely why we archive the audio of the midi tracks after we finish mixing.
With real audio tracks...they are there...as you recorded them.
Also...If you are going to keep going back to the original MIDI tracks to edit, then first get your editing finalized...and then just record the MIDI as an audio file and be done with it.
Easier said than done, and IMHO continuing with the midi tracks until the final mix is complete, then archving them as audio, if/when you edit the midi tracks, there's no need to waste time during the mix process recording them (in real time) to audio tracks. Once the mix is completed and you are committed to the sounds of the virtual tracks, archive those.
Also, making good notes on the midi patches can be extremely helpful for remixing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823707 - 10/12/07 10:44 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
It really makes little difference to keep MIDI tracks as MIDI until the end....because if you make any dramatic changes to your MIDI tracks...then they will not match up to the other, prerecorded audio tracks.
So you end up having to start fresh, with it all…
Exactly why you should stick with the midi tracks until finished mixing. Any changes you can easily make to the midi tracks, however if you commit to audio you have to re-record to make any changes.
If you are just hashing out a song...and you are still doing pre-production instead of final tracking...they yeah, keep the MIDI tracks as MIDI during that process. But IMO...once recording starts...you might as well cut the umbilical chord from the virtual MIDI tracks and have everything tracked as an audio file. There as LOT...a LOT less crap you have to archive and keep notes on. 
It's midi, it's nothing in terms of data size vs audio files. Hundreds of midi tracks would have to be involved to equal one audio track in file size.
Also...what if the synth module you used is no longer available or functional 2-3 years down the road...?
You will have to reconstruct the patches from scratch anyway.
The MIDI data is not going to help you much there, unless you are able to find the exact same modules/libraries...etc…
That's why we archive after we finish mixing.
Hey...10-15 years ago...I had MIDI up to my eyeballs. And I was doing exactly what you describe...and it was a real PITA…a real time consumer. Then I stopped and asked myself why the heck I would want to stay with virtual tracks...? And I then decided to just record the output of the synths as real audio. Also...I record it to tape first before I dump into the DAW...and the tape really smoothes out the digital hash you can get from some synths. I'm just a lot happier working with pure audio tracks once I commit myself to actual tracking and past the pre-production stage. But, if some folks like working with MIDI virtual tracks throughout their production...there is nothing wrong with that. I just prefer the all-audio SOP. 
That's all fine, until you want to make changes. Then, it's back to recording those tracks...again.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823767 - 10/12/07 12:27 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
MP Hall of Fame Member
Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 11537
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Never had a problem...doing it my way.
Having to archive and keep notes on MIDI files...plus having to also preserve the actual patches/programs of the synths...not to mention keeping the actual synth modules/keyboards in good operation and on tap...
...it's just lot of useless overhead...IMO.
I rough out my tracks using MIDI...and then I record them as audio.
No different than when you set up fro a vocal or a guitar or drum track. You first do a couple of sound checks...maybe record a take or two to make sure you are getting what you want...
...and then you commit the vocals, guitar and drums, etc…as an audio track.
Why treat a synth any different t…just because it is MIDI capable…?
I'm a firm believe in making a commitment instead of always second guessing myself "just in case"….and having multiple versions/choices to have to always wade through every time I want to make a mixing decision.
I know that SOP works for some people...but you end up with too many takes and saves...
Since most of my tracks are instruments recorded as audio…worrying about one or two MIDI tracks is a waste of time. I’ll just record them as audio too.
If I was doing all-MIDI/synth music…then I might worry about preserving all the MIDI data and all the synths/patches…etc….but I doubt it, as I would just record all of them as audio too…and be done with it.
But you do it the way you like to...nothing wrong with it, if that's what/how you need to do.
Edited by miroslav (10/12/07 12:28 PM)
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823828 - 10/12/07 02:19 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
Lets see, small data files for midi that can be edited at will
vs
rerecording in real time for every change in the track.
I'll take door #2 thanks.
If you're playing with your own material on your own time that's one thing, however when it's someone elses time/money, IMHO they should have every option available to them.
You gotta keep notes on the audio files same as the midi files. There will be far less midi files than audio. Then there's the whole file size difference as well.
Another factor in the equation is most virtual tracks these days are not hardware but software not hardware based.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823834 - 10/12/07 02:35 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
MP Hall of Fame Member
Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 11537
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Yeah...OK...whatever....
...I prefer to record audio...not MIDI.
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823938 - 10/12/07 06:07 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
Given the choice of recording it through cheap pres as the OP intends or sticking with midi tracks and doing far less work recording and rerecording I'll stick with the midi tracks, eliminating at least one conversion in the process.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823946 - 10/12/07 06:25 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
BrianK
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/00
Posts: 228
Loc: Los Angeles,CA,UNITED STATES
|
|
Offline
|
|
PLUS, with MIDI tracks, you can keep the perormance and adjust/change the sound when you get to a final mix.
_________________________
Relax and float downstream...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823954 - 10/12/07 07:01 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: BrianK]
|
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
MP Hall of Fame Member
Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 11537
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Well...one other reasons I don't bother with MIDI after I get past the pre-production state...is that you always have to keep turning on all your modules and samplers and keyboards everytime you open up the project to do some work...
..otherwise...you got nothing playing back from your MIDI tracks.
With everything recorded as audio...I can just turn on my monitors and my DAW...I don't need anything else on while I'm editing.
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1823998 - 10/12/07 09:48 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
Yes and it's so much work to turn things on, God all those on switches are exausting. And launching those soft synths is so much extra work...LOL!!!!!!
Please, if it's that much of a hassle just sit in front of the tube with another chilli dog.
Client: I'd like to have the (insert fav chord here) at measure 84 hold for a whole note not a 1/2 note.
Engineer: Sure, no problem, there, that should take care of it. We can continue what we were doing.
OR
Client: I'd like to have the (insert fav chord here) at measure 84 hold for a whole note not a 1/2 note.
Engineer: OK well I'll need to stop what we are currently doing to rerecord that since I'm not using the midi files I recorded them all to audio.
Which client do you think is coming back?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1824173 - 10/13/07 11:23 AM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
Given most of the synths used today are soft, the issue of hardware not being available is pretty moot. Obviously in the case of hardware coming with the artist the ONLY choice is to record audio, so that also is a moot point.
Music is constantly evolviing from conception to final product and beyond. How many times have we gone to concerts and heard different versions of songs than were the recorded ones?
Taking away the ability to make changes in this situation is limiting the artists creative ability unnecessarily. We prefer to give our clients every option possible, rather than explain to them why we cannot, or need to take so much time, to do something so elementary.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1824355 - 10/13/07 09:36 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: miroslav]
|
audiorulez
Senior Member
Registered: 06/20/07
Posts: 493
|
|
Offline
|
|
Not sure how recording audio tracks is "taking away the ability to make changes"...???
Read my previous posts I explain it very simply.
Great recording sessions were being done L-O-N-G before MIDI existed... ...and in the last 10 years or so, there has been a move away from MIDI for many people who at one time used it extensively (like myself)...and yet, great sessions are still being recorded using audio-only tracks.
But it's not long before midi existed, it's 2007. Softsynths are a major part of music, and are becoming more so every day. Far beyond the synthesis strings and horns of early days, drums, full orchestras, pretty much anything you can ask for is available via midi.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#1824356 - 10/13/07 09:44 PM
Re: Advice on a good preamp a/d converter
[Re: audiorulez]
|
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
MP Hall of Fame Member
Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 11537
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA
|
|
Offline
|
|
Not sure how recording audio tracks is "taking away the ability to make changes"...??? Read my previous posts I explain it very simply.
I already did...and I still say, I don't see how recording audio tracks is "taking away the ability to make changes"...???
So...you feel that once you record audio tracks...you can't make any changes...???
Boy...there's a lot of guys NOT using ANY MIDI that would disagree with you!
I dunno'...with my DAW, I sure can make a LOT of changes to the audio tracks...and I'm not using MIDI. 
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: BrianK, J.J. Blair
| |
