Music Player Network Home Guitar Player Magazine Keyboard Magazine Bass Player Magazine EQ Magazine
Page 1 of 1 1
Topic Options
#1722263 - 03/23/07 10:43 PM Guitar quality-vintage vs new
Strategery
MP Hall of Fame Member


Registered: 02/24/07
Posts: 2662
Loc: Georgia USA

Offline
Sorry if you've already discussed this but....

So many people rave about the old guitars yet, some only have single adjustment truss rods or worse yet....NONE.

You know, the old nitro-cellulose vs polyurethane thing.
Pickups debate and what makes the old ones better if they are.
Truss rod debate.
Wiring, bridges, tuners, etc...
Woods or the wood ages.

Personally, I think guitars nowdays are as good if not better than the old.
I will say that my almost 20 year old strat that I bought new is sure sounding better than ever and I'm sure that's age, but other than that....I don't know.

Just curious.

I will put this up in the guitar forum as well for a little chatter.

Thanks,

Randy
_________________________
"I like them franch fried puh-taters...Uhm-Hmm."

Top
#1722372 - 03/24/07 08:52 AM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: Strategery]
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
10k Club


Registered: 05/23/00
Posts: 12329
Loc: NY Hudson Valley, USA

Offline
Yeah...that will be good for some chatter over there. \:\)

While I can agree that there are some great, old guitars out there and some true collectors items...
...I disagree with the guitarists who feel that ONLY the old stuff is worth buying/playing if you want a quality guitar or a good sounding one.

I've had my hands on many old ones (when they weren't even old yet) and I even have a few...but I also have a bunch of new ones that are just so sweet sounding and their quality is excellent, especially when you consider their moderate price points.

I think what a lot of the “old guitars are better” crowd is really trying to buy…is the vibe…though they won’t admit it.
Vibe is good…and I don’t see anything wrong with saying you want something just because it’s “vintage” and you think it’s cooler because of that.
I just hate the “new guitars are not as good” arguments…
_________________________
miroslav - miroslavmusic.com

"Just because it happened to you, it doesn't mean it's important."

Top
#1722487 - 03/24/07 12:46 PM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: miroslav]
Jeff Anderson
Member


Registered: 04/24/06
Posts: 11
Loc: Lafayette IN

Offline
You both are going to love next month’s debate column in EQ
_________________________
Jeffery Anderson
President ~ Mixing Engineer
Sound Logic LLC
http://www.soundlogicrecording.com

Top
#1722492 - 03/24/07 12:54 PM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: Jeff Anderson]
Strategery
MP Hall of Fame Member


Registered: 02/24/07
Posts: 2662
Loc: Georgia USA

Offline
In EQ, huh?

I'll look foward to it. \:\)

Hey Miroslav...I think if it sounds good....then it's good.
I don't subscribe to the Vintage myth either....unless it cuts the mustard....same as with any other guitar.

Randy
_________________________
"I like them franch fried puh-taters...Uhm-Hmm."

Top
#1731099 - 04/09/07 04:24 AM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: Strategery]
Editor Boy
Senior Member


Registered: 05/14/01
Posts: 260
Loc: San Mateo,CA,UNITED STATES

Offline
GUITAR PLAYER just published a roundup of guitars under $500 (street price) in the May 2007 issue, and we were pleasantly shocked at the remarkable quality of some of those guitars. For example, some of us wondered why we'd pay thousands for an upscale PRS, when the $499 off-shore PRS model was soooooo damn good.

If only these guitars were available back in the, ahem, late '60s/early '70s when I was struggling to play crap models with prickly frets and actions higher than the Effiel Tower!

Cheers,
Mike

Top
#1786574 - 07/25/07 07:04 AM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: Editor Boy]
Picker
MP Hall of Fame Member


Registered: 06/13/04
Posts: 7110
Loc: A few miles fro the corner of ...

Offline
If you ask folks like George Gruhn, he says the wood they used "back in the day" was better than what guitars today are made of. He has a number of reasons, some of which have to do with the age of the tree the wood came from, long term seasoning as opposed to kiln drying, etc and so on. This applies, by the way, to solid body electrics as well as acoustics.

I don't really know about any of that, but I do know that onetime I was fortunate enough to play a '62 Strat for about an hour, and then I knew what all the fuss was about. Now, I have played vintage instruments before that left me saying "big deal, I wouldn't dream of paying that much for this". But this one guitar was the most amazing Fender Strat I have ever played. I told the guy who was selling it "now, THIS is a Strat!" and he said, "yeah, I know."

I can see where a guy could find one like that, and be hooked on the "vintage" mystique, hoping to find more axes like that. I can also see where he'd end up putting up with a lot of mediocre guitars from the same era. Truth is, the percentage of "good" axes produced today way outstrips the number of "good" axes back in the '50's, '60's, and so on, due to better production techniques and equipment, the fact that more guitars are being made now than back when, etc. So, I think percentage-wise, a guy is more likely to find a "magic" axe now than ever before. Of course, you still have to do the looking...

Of course, my goal in buying a guitar is to play it, and the whole "collector" thing is less about how good it sounds and plays than it is about age, condition, and having all it's original parts. Isn't it weird that the things that made the guitars desirable in the first place no longer matter to their value? And how sad is it that those guitars, the ones that really are great, will be locked away from players, and none of those beautiful voices will ever to be heard again because they are worth too much to risk using them?

Until that '62 Strat, I wasn't a real believer in vintage guitar "mojo". Even now, I wouldn't pay what that '62 Strat would bring in today's market, even if I could. But I haven't played another one like it since, and I still remember it very fondly...


Edited by Picker (07/25/07 07:32 AM)
_________________________
ROCK GUITARIST ABDUCTED BY ALIENS AND RETURNED TO EARTH!

Anal probe wouldn't fit past his head!


Top
#1793266 - 08/09/07 04:17 AM Re: Guitar quality-vintage vs new [Re: Picker]
BrianK
Senior Member


Registered: 12/17/00
Posts: 228
Loc: Los Angeles,CA,UNITED STATES

Offline
I wanted to buy a Gibson SG. I have preferred older ones I tried. But I was not against a "new" guitar - reissues and things are fine for me. But after trying VERY VERY expensive custom shop guitars and normal store models (some of which were quite good), I bought an OLD one. It sounded an played SO much better.

It cost a lot more money than I wanted to spend, but I paid what it was worth - and they are going UP every year. They NEVER go down in value. So I will get to use this amazing instrument for many years and then possibly sell it and buy a CAR with the difference. Wow...

(With that very '62 Strat years ago, it would cost at LEAST $10,000s more now, and likely as much or more in 2-3 years!) Yes, not all are good, but the good ones are better!
_________________________
Relax and float downstream...

Top
Page 1 of 1 1


Moderator:  Anderton, Matt Harper 
Hop to:
Support Your Forums