Jump to content


Please note: You can easily log in to MPN using your Facebook account!

Behringer Kobol


Recommended Posts



  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting strategy to consider... reproducing not just the ubiquitous old boards, but also the rare birds.

Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our now not-so-new new video at https://youtu.be/3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out! And hopefully I'll have something new here this year. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd never even heard of it prior to this.

 

Given the time lapse between other Behringer announcements and the finished product finally being available for sale, it will probably be a while before it's on the streets.

 

Grey

I'm not interested in someone's ability to program. I'm interested in their ability to compose and play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It"s French. Made by RSF. One of my favorites. It had tons of character. XILS lab put out some cool VSTs of The Polykobol.

"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

 

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!

So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another synth? Shouldn"t Uli slow down a bit, and get some of his other synths to market? Like the UB-XA, or the MonoPoly, or the 2600? Is he trying to corner the synth market? Other manufactures take time too develop a synth. It KORG a awhile to produce the OPSIX. Although, they did produce other products ahead of this. I just feel, maybe Behringer should slow down a bit. That"s just my opinion.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because I think the PolyKB is cool.

 

[video:youtube]

 

[video:youtube]

"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

 

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!

So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had not even heard of it (the original). Some quick research, it looks pretty cool. I still don't have a model D or anything in that fat bass niche. The choices are really increasing. By the time I get a clue how I might use one, another choice appears. I like this one.

 

Thanks for all the links and the heads up!

RT-3/U-121/Leslie 21H and 760/Saltarelle Nuage/MOXF6/MIDIhub, 

SL-880/Nektar T4/Numa Cx2/Deepmind12/Virus TI 61/SL61 mk2

Stylophone R8/Behringer RD-8/Proteus 1/MP-7/Zynthian 4

MPC1k/JV1010/Unitor 8/Model D & 2600/WX-5&7/VL70m/DMP-18 Pedals

Natal drums/congas etc & misc bowed/plucked/blown instruments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Important distinction: The Behringer Model D is available now. The Kobol--assuming that previous timings hold true--is probably not going to hit the streets for two to three years. Place your bets accordingly.

 

Grey

I'm not interested in someone's ability to program. I'm interested in their ability to compose and play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is he trying to corner the synth market?

 

I don't know if that's their plan, but I think it's happening already. Someone, somewhere, is designing a great, *new* analog synth (not a clone) - let's say a 6-voice poly. But not having the resources, facilities, and large market numbers that Behringer have, has to price his instrument at 3,000 or so. Now if I were that guy, my first thought would be, "Behringer has *announced* five synths with comparable specs, at a fifth of the price. Probably, a good slice of my potential buyers are going to wait to buy one or three Behringer synths, rather than one of mine - even if they will have to wait another year." So he just gives up and stops developing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Synth Market" is both small and fierce. Its hard to imagine many people piling up B synths and no one else's. They're more like vintage sprinkles. You drop a couple of them on top of a more substantial sundae. Man does not survive on Moogs alone. He also needs a Nord Stage, a Minilogue and a wife to tell him its too early in the fiscal year to also buy a Hydrasynth. A few marriages have been saved because he bought more software and less hardware. Vintage emulations & arguments over filters wow me a lot less than useful new hybrids.

 "I want to be an intellectual, but I don't have the brainpower.
  The absent-mindedness, I've got that licked."
        ~ John Cleese

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Kobol was and is in the class (IMNSHO) of "this was an alternative to the usual, manufactured for a market that might not have been able to get the usual easily or affordably." There are a lot of vintage monosynths, and a few very impressive vintage polysynths, created in Europe, the Soviet Bloc, and elsewhere, that came into existence strictly because cost, import duty, and shipping (to say nothing of the dubious availability of aftermarket support and repairs) made it a real dangerous gamble to buy a Moog or Oberheim or SCI.

 

That said, I've always liked the RSF sound. I'd enjoy playing the XILS Polykobol if the user interface were more practical and less unnecessarily skeumorphic, but that is definitely one of my own personal weirdnesses.

 

As I have noted many times in the past, the very first product Uli ever made, when it was just him in his parents' home, was a synthesizer. He has always had a passion for synths, and there is some weight to the argument that his entire career up to now has been focused on generating the product construction facilities, manpower, and mindshare to do synths right and be taken seriously for it. Why NOT recreate some of the rare synths from his youth, along with the famous ones?

 

Also, someone above mentioned the lone synth designer or tiny team designing and building hardware synths... imagine a company with the money and resources to create FIFTY of those little teams and give them endless funding and support as long as they delivered great synths at the end. (People always complain about how, instead of the usual "get it out the door now and fix it later" mentality of every other B product, the synths always seem to take forever. This is why.) He can afford to shotgun the market, make a gazillion no-sound chassis prototypes and hint at them, see what sticks, and adjust schedules so the more popular ones come out first.

 

My guess is that the engineers have been ordered to work under the dictum "fast cheap or good, pick two", but with "good" substituting for "fast". I'm unaware of any B engineer being fired for not going fast enough on building a synth that sounds close -- in some cases QUITE close -- to the original, while using modern tech to add features and cut prices, all without sacrificing quality.

 

Uli knows that the one place where the growth timeline of his company has hurt him is its reputation for poor quality, and he also has realized that it would take years to overcome that in the world of synths. Now he's getting there, and the Kobol is only one drop in a cresting wave.

Dr. Mike Metlay (PhD in nuclear physics, golly gosh) :D

Musician, Author, Editor, Educator, Impresario, Online Radio Guy, Cut-Rate Polymath, and Kindly Pedant

Editor-in-Chief, Bjooks ~ Author of SYNTH GEMS 1

 

clicky!:  more about me ~ my radio station (and my fam) ~ my local tribe ~ my day job ~ my bookmy music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...