Music
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 28 1 2 3 4 27 28
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Dave Bryce] #2913900
03/09/18 11:37 AM
03/09/18 11:37 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,311
Brooklyn, NY
J
jimkost2002 Online content
Platinum Member
jimkost2002  Online Content
Platinum Member
J

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,311
Brooklyn, NY
Any word as to TP 100 or 100, Dave?


"I have constantly tried to deliver only products which withstand the closest scrutiny
KC Island
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Al Coda] #2913901
03/09/18 11:39 AM
03/09/18 11:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 123
S
SteinwayB Offline
Senior Member
SteinwayB  Offline
Senior Member
S

Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 123
Is it just me, or does the AP sound terrible? Hard to tell with demos, but to lug a 50+ lb monster to gigs the piano needs to sound amazing. The other sounds are great, but same with my CP4 at almost half the weight.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Synthoid] #2913902
03/09/18 11:40 AM
03/09/18 11:40 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 643
Charlotte, NC
J
jeffinpghpa Offline
Gold Member
jeffinpghpa  Offline
Gold Member
J

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 643
Charlotte, NC
It looks cool, that's for sure. Not sure how the modeled AP stands up against some competition here - Nord Electro HP, Korg Grandstage 73.

Not a fan of the TP-100. Bleh.

Looks very Rhodes-ish. Not sure there's anything that I would sell existing gear to fund.


Yamaha U1 Upright, Kurzweil Forte 7, Viscount Legend Live, Roland FA-07, Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk2, Arturia V Collection 6, Komplete 12, Lots of iPad Stuff, Pair of QSC K10 Speakers
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: jeffinpghpa] #2913907
03/09/18 11:48 AM
03/09/18 11:48 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
drawback Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
drawback  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
Its difficult to tell if a Mojo61 would hang too far off the back to balance. If there could be a couple of swing support arm accessories that could be attached to the back of the Seven, that would be very cool. Look Ma: no stands!


Rod
1977 Kawai KG-2C | Mojo61 A/B | iConnectAudio4+ | iOS / MacOS
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: drawback] #2913908
03/09/18 11:53 AM
03/09/18 11:53 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 481
United States
keyman27 Offline
Senior Member
keyman27  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 481
United States
It's a Zarenbourg!

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: SteinwayB] #2913909
03/09/18 11:54 AM
03/09/18 11:54 AM
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 336
T
tfort Offline
Senior Member
tfort  Offline
Senior Member
T

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 336
Originally Posted By: SteinwayB
Is it just me, or does the AP sound terrible? Hard to tell with demos, but to lug a 50+ lb monster to gigs the piano needs to sound amazing. The other sounds are great, but same with my CP4 at almost half the weight.


Now we know why Andrea was so positive on modelled AP sounds last year...

Re. the weight, Crumar I'm sure will point out that if you take the 52 lb. figure, then you need to add the weight of a case/gig bag and stand to your slab to make it comparable.

Crumar says it has 9 synthesis engines:

1. Tine Electric Piano
2. Reed Electric Piano
3. Electric Baby Grand
4. Clavi E.P.
5. DX Digital E.P.
6. MKS Digital E.P.
7. Vibraphone
8. Acoustic Grand Piano
9. Sample Playback

Re. the Sample Playback engine, is the control for that the Pads encoder? Can you load other sounds into it? The rest of the controls seem pretty straightforward.

Guido- Can you add a picture to the web site of what the wifi editor looks like?

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: jahfume] #2913910
03/09/18 11:55 AM
03/09/18 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,620
the swamp
davedoerfler Offline
MPN Advisory Board
davedoerfler  Offline
MPN Advisory Board
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,620
the swamp
Originally Posted By: jahfume
What no chrome legs?
I'm Out! smirk


my 1982 Rhodes Mark II has factory silver colored baked enamel legs. Still look good after all these years. Chrome is expensive and chips then rusts. Once it chips it looks like crap.

Originally Posted By: drawback
Look Ma: no stands!


re living the 1970's cool


A reason why I collect old keyboards is that I feel partly responsible for doing it, responsible for preserving history and being a custodian for these things
Plus, old gear has a story. I like that.
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: davedoerfler] #2913912
03/09/18 12:04 PM
03/09/18 12:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,866
San Francisco
Adan Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Adan  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,866
San Francisco
I love seeing a keyboard like this come out. The flat top/controls in front is so obviously useful for stacking, but it took a smaller company like Crumar to finally do it.

TP100 is not the best action, but in my opinion the "playability to weight" ratio makes it an excellent choice for a keyboard that's going to be moving around a lot.

They could either do TP40 or the wooden built in case, they couldn't do both and have it be portable by today's standards.

I don't know if I'll be getting one, I'm all keyboarded up at the moment, but with a product like this there's something to be said for giving them a year to work the bugs out anyway.


Crumar Seven, Crumar Mojo 61, Korg Vox Continental, Yamaha CP73.

roccoromanucci.com
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Adan] #2913914
03/09/18 12:14 PM
03/09/18 12:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,435
Take a guess ....
Delaware Dave Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Delaware Dave  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,435
Take a guess ....
And my wait for an SMC-73 (with TP8O keybed) and the built-in Gemini continues .... taz coffee puff hitt rimshot bor HeadPop


57 Hammond B3; 69 Hammond L100P; 68 Leslie 122; Kurzweil PC3; GEM Equinox; Voce V5+; Neo Vent; EV ELX112P; GSI Gemini Desktop Module; www.dyinbreedband.com
www.thewildthingsrock.webs.com
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: jimkost2002] #2913916
03/09/18 12:24 PM
03/09/18 12:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 20,302
Thousand Oaks,CA,UNITED STATES
Dave Bryce Offline

KCFFL Champ '14,'16,'18
Dave Bryce  Offline

KCFFL Champ '14,'16,'18
20k Club

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 20,302
Thousand Oaks,CA,UNITED STATES
Originally Posted By: jimkost2002
Any word as to TP 100 or 100, Dave?

I'll check.

dB

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Dave Bryce] #2913918
03/09/18 12:38 PM
03/09/18 12:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,311
Brooklyn, NY
J
jimkost2002 Online content
Platinum Member
jimkost2002  Online Content
Platinum Member
J

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,311
Brooklyn, NY
Thanks, man...
TP40 would be AWESOME.....


"I have constantly tried to deliver only products which withstand the closest scrutiny
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: jimkost2002] #2913921
03/09/18 01:00 PM
03/09/18 01:00 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 991
UK
N
nickd Offline
Gold Member
nickd  Offline
Gold Member
N

Joined: May 2010
Posts: 991
UK
User manual now available:
http://www.crumar.it/?a=support&b=36

Huge amounts of detail in here... including the helpful advice not to try and insert your whole arm in the accessory tray.

Couple of things I spotted: the 'pad' is described as a VA synth, and you can connect a USB MIDI controller if you want, as there is no old-school 5-pin MIDI IN.

Last edited by nickd; 03/09/18 01:08 PM.
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: nickd] #2913923
03/09/18 01:12 PM
03/09/18 01:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,147
New York
C
cedar Offline
Platinum Member
cedar  Offline
Platinum Member
C

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,147
New York
Originally Posted By: nickd

Huge amounts of detail in here... including the helpful advice not to try and insert your whole arm in the accessory tray.


Well, that's a deal-breaker for me. cool

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: nickd] #2913926
03/09/18 01:34 PM
03/09/18 01:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,564
out in the sticks
A
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Al Coda  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
A

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,564
out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: nickd
... and you can connect a USB MIDI controller if you want, as there is no old-school 5-pin MIDI IN.


Which is worthless when your already existing "better weighted action" controller has no USB because its built like a tank ultra reliable flat top keyboard from the past.

A.C.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: keyman27] #2913927
03/09/18 01:39 PM
03/09/18 01:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,564
out in the sticks
A
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Al Coda  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
A

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,564
out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: keyman27
It's a Zarenbourg!


Excellent observation !
But at a better price I guess.

I was waiting for the Zarenbourgh module which didnt hit the market up to now.
What about a "Seven" module (w/ physical MIDI I/O AND USB) ?

Or is the "Seven" just only a "Gemini" in a keyboard shell ?

A.C.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Al Coda] #2913928
03/09/18 01:40 PM
03/09/18 01:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 427
Mainland Florida
MojoGuyPan Offline
Senior Member
MojoGuyPan  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 427
Mainland Florida
When is this going to be available? The Seven checks all the boxes for me.

Was there an AP in the demo with Max? I heard one section where it sounded like AP in the treble but sounded like a CP70 in the bass/tenor so I figured it was the CP70 model.

If this thing has a boss AP, I'm all in.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Al Coda] #2913929
03/09/18 01:48 PM
03/09/18 01:48 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,176
USA, greater NY area
ElmerJFudd Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
ElmerJFudd  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,176
USA, greater NY area
Love the concept and the vibe. The weight is rough for me.
Hoping patch saving is a breeze and recall too from that row of buttons?

The audio in the video is a bit hot as distorting on my phone even with headphones. But we know how the Gemini and Mojo EPs sound.
Not impressed once again with the Acoustic Plano sound presented and that's a deal breaker (for me).

And I'll bring up again. If you gig a Seven and a Mojo. Both of these incarnations of the Gemini hardware omit a programmable synth. Neither has pitch or mod wheels or AT. So can we assume a Crumar synth is coming? That would be great and bad (for me) as I never carry 3 boards. Ever.


Live: Casio PX-560, Roland VR-700
Home: Rebuilt 1910 Chickering 5'2", Fender Rhodes MKI 88k, Yamaha S90ES
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: ElmerJFudd] #2913930
03/09/18 01:52 PM
03/09/18 01:52 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
drawback Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
drawback  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
Originally Posted By: ElmerJFudd
So can we assume a Crumar synth is coming?


.... you mean.... a Crumar LEAD??


Rod
1977 Kawai KG-2C | Mojo61 A/B | iConnectAudio4+ | iOS / MacOS
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: ElmerJFudd] #2913931
03/09/18 01:54 PM
03/09/18 01:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,186
Scotland
N4dr0j Offline OP
Platinum Member
N4dr0j  Offline OP
Platinum Member

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,186
Scotland
Originally Posted By: ElmerJFudd
Love the concept and the vibe. The weight is rough for me.
Hoping patch saving is a breeze and recall too from that row of buttons?

The audio in the video is a bit hot as distorting on my phone even with headphones. But we know how the Gemini and Mojo EPs sound.
Not impressed once again with the Acoustic Plano sound presented and that's a deal breaker (for me).

And I'll bring up again. If you gig a Seven and a Mojo. Both of these incarnations of the Gemini hardware omit a programmable synth. Neither has pitch or mod wheels or AT. So can we assume a Crumar synth is coming? That would be great and bad (for me) as I never carry 3 boards. Ever.


A quality sounding VA synth and a good organ tone in one cheap package would be ultimate. No other bells and whistles. VR-730 is close, but the organ sounds off. Nord Stage hits the nail on the head but it's 3 grand.

If I were to get the Seven I'd either be putting an Electro or FA on top of it - never both. I'd love to be able to afford a top tier that did both well.


Nord E4 SW73
Yamaha MODX7
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Al Coda] #2913932
03/09/18 01:57 PM
03/09/18 01:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 214
Midwest
M
Morrisseysixman Offline
Senior Member
Morrisseysixman  Offline
Senior Member
M

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 214
Midwest
Originally Posted By: Al Coda
Originally Posted By: keyman27
It's a Zarenbourg!


Excellent observation !
But at a better price I guess.




Along the same lines, this Seven is a God send for my wallet because it is (temporarily?) redirecting my GAS away from that Vintage Vibe 73 in the Garage Sale section... which is in no way in my budget. I understand the differences between the two boards (digital vs. analog, etc.), but this Seven has got some of the same authentic mojo (pun intended) as the VV has.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: nickd] #2913936
03/09/18 02:39 PM
03/09/18 02:39 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
drawback Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
drawback  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,963
Victoria, BC
Originally Posted By: nickd
User manual now available:
http://www.crumar.it/?a=support&b=36

Huge amounts of detail in here...


After a quick read-through it looks as though there's a very good amount of adjusting one can do with the Acoustic Piano so I'd sure like to see if it can find its way into a future Mojo61 OS!


Rod
1977 Kawai KG-2C | Mojo61 A/B | iConnectAudio4+ | iOS / MacOS
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Al Coda] #2913938
03/09/18 02:42 PM
03/09/18 02:42 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13,747
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club
AnotherScott  Offline
10k Club

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13,747
Originally Posted By: Al Coda

TP-40L action is available as 76 and 88 keys versions.
For 73 keys youd have to cut it.
All the other TP-40 seem to be available with 88 keys only.

Custom product might be too expensive and Ive never seen any TP40 M, H, GH or WOOD other than w/ 88keys in a keyboard up to now,- so I guess its TP-100.

I believe Nord used a 76 key version of the TP40 (non-M) in all the 76 key versions of the Stage prior to the 2EX.

But I agree this is probably TP100 based on the weight in a wood case. (Assuming it must indeed be a Fatar.)

Pricier than I'd expected, but I still see the appeal. I'd be curious to see how the playing experience compares to the SV-1 (which is quite good for EPs in particular). Some will presumably want it for the look/ergonomics/vibe etc. But at that premium over the Korg, it should sound and feel better, we'll see...


Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: AnotherScott] #2913941
03/09/18 02:47 PM
03/09/18 02:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 279
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
K
kenheeter Offline
Senior Member
kenheeter  Offline
Senior Member
K

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 279
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
My Nord Stage EX 76 has a TP40 action and it's not for sale!

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Morrisseysixman] #2913942
03/09/18 02:50 PM
03/09/18 02:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 594
Ohio
Z
zoooombiex Offline
Gold Member
zoooombiex  Offline
Gold Member
Z

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 594
Ohio
I love pretty much everything about this except for the actual sounds themselves. I don't mean that as a slight. I wish more companies were thinking along these lines.

It's evident they put a lot of thought into the practical needs of a stage piano, in ways that are right up my alley. The built-in case. Colored encoders for immediate visual feedback on settings. Flat top. Simple, intuitive layout. Even the accessory tray is a thoughtful addition. Cable connectors on the side - avoids the cascade of wires in front of your knees. (I couldn't tell from the photos/demo if the ends of the jacks are flush with the outer case - allowing you to use right-angle connectors? I personally prefer that setup so that the cables aren't sticking out 4-5" from the edge of the case and just drop straight down.)

But I'm just not convinced that as of today the EP/clav modeling has surpassed the sampling. That's based on the demo and personal use of the Mojo 61, which I assume is the same modelling as the Seven. I haven't tried their acoustic piano modeling in person, but the demo - while perfectly serviceable - didn't really grab me either. That said, I'm sure the modelling is something that will continue to evolve.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: AnotherScott] #2913943
03/09/18 02:50 PM
03/09/18 02:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
E
E Baxter Put Offline
Member
E Baxter Put  Offline
Member
E

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
I am buying this... for sure.

Everything I want for my gigging piano.

My only criticism is the glowing knobs and logo. I prefer less lights.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: E Baxter Put] #2913945
03/09/18 02:59 PM
03/09/18 02:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,186
Scotland
N4dr0j Offline OP
Platinum Member
N4dr0j  Offline OP
Platinum Member

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,186
Scotland
I hope Guido and Crumar do well from this board. I showed some friends who work in sales the Seven and they were amazed. Had never heard of Crumar, but they were now dead interested.


Nord E4 SW73
Yamaha MODX7
Re: Crumar Seven [Re: SteinwayB] #2913948
03/09/18 03:14 PM
03/09/18 03:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 242
San Diego, CA, USA
U.Honey Offline
Senior Member
U.Honey  Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 242
San Diego, CA, USA
Originally Posted By: SteinwayB
Is Hard to tell with demos, but to lug a 50+ lb monster to gigs the piano needs to sound amazing. The other sounds are great, but same with my CP4 at almost half the weight.


How much is your CP4 with a hard case? My Moxf8 is 32 lb without a case but it turns into a 52 lb monster with (plastic) Gator ATA case.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: U.Honey] #2913949
03/09/18 03:20 PM
03/09/18 03:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,147
New York
C
cedar Offline
Platinum Member
cedar  Offline
Platinum Member
C

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,147
New York
CP4 weights just about 39 pounds, without any case. I have a Gator case, which may well weigh 10 pounds or more.

Re: Crumar Seven [Re: SteinwayB] #2913951
03/09/18 03:26 PM
03/09/18 03:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,205
Glendale, Ca.
Dave Ferris Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Dave Ferris  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,205
Glendale, Ca.
Originally Posted By: SteinwayB
Is it just me, or does the AP sound terrible?


Over the Neumann KH120s and through the Benchmark DAC3, not at all very flattering to these ears. It's fairly obvious they aren't going after the more serious pianists that would be attracted to the CP4, RD2000 and MP11SE.

But everything else I heard sounded very good though. smile thu


https://soundcloud.com/dave-ferris

2005 NY Steinway D, Yamaha CP4, CP5.


Re: Crumar Seven [Re: Synthoid] #2913952
03/09/18 03:27 PM
03/09/18 03:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,866
San Francisco
Adan Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member
Adan  Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,866
San Francisco
So it's about 44 lbs if you don't pack the legs into the top part of the case. That's carryable for short distances but there is no shoulder strap, so it's 44 lbs in one hand, which is not a great way to limber your fingers up for a gig. I think the legs and the case are supercool, but from a portability standpoint, I'm not sure the hard case is really better. I guess if it's flight-worthy, then you're saving weight over an ATA case, but then your beautiful Crumar shell takes a beating. For the drive-to gig, I'd rather put a 30+ lb keyboard into a soft case with wheels and/or shoulder strap.


Crumar Seven, Crumar Mojo 61, Korg Vox Continental, Yamaha CP73.

roccoromanucci.com
Page 2 of 28 1 2 3 4 27 28

Moderated by  Dave Bryce, Stephen Fortner 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1