Music Player Network Home Guitar Player Magazine Keyboard Magazine Bass Player Magazine EQ Magazine
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2829424 - 01/19/17 11:11 AM DSI Rev 2
vonnor Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/02/14
Posts: 673
Loc: Centreville, VA USA


I thought this could use it's own thread.

~ vonnor


Edited by vonnor (01/19/17 11:11 AM)
_________________________
Gear:
Hardware: Nord Stage 2 - 76, Korg Kronos 2, Roland Fantom XR
Software: Cantabile 3, Halion Sonic 3 and assorted VST plug-ins.

Top
KC Island
#2829428 - 01/19/17 11:22 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: vonnor]
DicemLabs.com Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 4884
Loc: Orlando, Florida
Yes it certainly deserves its own thread.

More info, specs, etc:

https://www.davesmithinstruments.com/product/rev2/

Top
#2829455 - 01/19/17 12:42 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DicemLabs.com]
Sam Mullins Offline
Platinum Member

Registered: 08/21/07
Posts: 1292
Loc: Iowa City, Iowa
$1999.

Pretty good value given that the P08 was selling for $1799 a year ago ..and here you get twice the polyphony, extensive effects, and some architecture enhancements.
_________________________
Nord Stage 2 HA88, Korg Kronos 2 61, DSI Prophet 08 Module, Moog Sub 37, Yamaha U1 Upright
www.stickmanor.com
There's a thin white line between fear and fury - Stickman

Top
#2829467 - 01/19/17 01:17 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Sam Mullins]
wineandkeyz Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 02/06/06
Posts: 562
Loc: North Carolina
Originally Posted By: Sam Mullins
$1999.

Pretty good value given that the P08 was selling for $1799 a year ago ..and here you get twice the polyphony, extensive effects, and some architecture enhancements.


...and no line lump.
_________________________
LIVE: Yamaha S70XS; Roland Jupiter-80; Nord Electro 4D; Spacestation V3 or Traynor K4
HOME: Yamaha S90ES; Hammond XK3C & Neo Vent; Roland Fantom X7; Arp Odyssey
QUIK-LOK X STANDS!

Top
#2829473 - 01/19/17 01:28 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: wineandkeyz]
count doerflera Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 12/27/12
Posts: 6260
Loc: thin ice
mine has a wall wart, but essentially the same thing. Agree about the value. Plenty of KC'ers who don't like the Curtis filter, but I have had my Prophet '08 PE keyboard for 8 years, never had a problem. Run it through a Lexicon MX-200 studio or if I take it out through a Earthquaker Devices Avalanche Run. Don't know if I will be upgrading (probably not) but this keyboard should sell well. thu
_________________________
I need to practice more than I do, and that will make my current gear - first rate, by any measure - sound even better than it already does.
Tim Wat

Top
#2829480 - 01/19/17 02:09 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: count doerflera]
kennyhues Offline
Member

Registered: 07/24/08
Posts: 3
Drool. Ing.

Top
#2829485 - 01/19/17 02:15 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: count doerflera]
brenner13 Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 12/12/10
Posts: 939
Loc: Kansas
Wha? Oh this is very cool. Thanks for starting it's own thread. I've been in the DeepMind12 woods for quite some time and haven't been paying attention to the NAMM thread.
Hmmmm...my DM12 might have a replacement in a few months, or perhaps a companion. Uh-oh, bitten by the analog bug. Please, nobody suggest any modular stuff to me. crazy
_________________________
Gig: Roland VR09, Fantom X7, AX09; Numa Compact2; QSC K12; JBL PRX615M
Studio: Korg MS2000R; Roland JX10, S550; Yamaha SY77, SY55, EX5; DM12; ES100
https://soundcloud.com/brad-renner

Top
#2829500 - 01/19/17 03:07 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: brenner13]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
NAMM-folks -- tell me about the Rev 2 action. Is it like the Prophet 6/OB-6?

Top
#2829516 - 01/19/17 03:33 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
matted stump Offline
Grand Poobah of the Trebuchet
10k Club

Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 15347
If they had put the filter chain from the Pro 2 in it instead of the Curtis filter, I would not be able to resist.

Very nice specs!
_________________________
Moe
---
Kawai Novus: "Please feel surprised even more."

http://www.hotrodmotm.com

Top
#2829523 - 01/19/17 04:03 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: matted stump]
ProfD Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 05/11/06
Posts: 9221
Loc: Wash DC Area
This culprit on the horizon probably caused the Prophet 08 price drop. wink cool
_________________________
PD

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn, is just to love and be loved in return."--E. Ahbez "Nature Boy"

Top
#2829545 - 01/19/17 05:47 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: wineandkeyz]
DicemLabs.com Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 4884
Loc: Orlando, Florida
Originally Posted By: wineandkeyz
Originally Posted By: Sam Mullins
$1999.

Pretty good value given that the P08 was selling for $1799 a year ago ..and here you get twice the polyphony, extensive effects, and some architecture enhancements.


...and no line lump.


Are you sure?

Quote:
Includes power supply for 110V – 240V AC operation (13-15 VDC, 600 mA).

Top
#2829551 - 01/19/17 06:19 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DicemLabs.com]
DarkyLord Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/10/01
Posts: 5008
Loc: Springfield, Virginia
Comes in 2 versions:
8 voice: $1500
16 voice: $2000

Uses the much nicer Fatar Tp9s Keybed.
And yes, a real AC receptacle- no ext pwr sup.

Top
#2829559 - 01/19/17 07:02 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DicemLabs.com]
wineandkeyz Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 02/06/06
Posts: 562
Loc: North Carolina
Originally Posted By: DulceLabs.com
Originally Posted By: wineandkeyz
Originally Posted By: Sam Mullins
$1999.

Pretty good value given that the P08 was selling for $1799 a year ago ..and here you get twice the polyphony, extensive effects, and some architecture enhancements.


...and no line lump.


Are you sure?

Quote:
Includes power supply for 110V – 240V AC operation (13-15 VDC, 600 mA).


I was just going by the photo on their website that shows an IEC connector.
_________________________
LIVE: Yamaha S70XS; Roland Jupiter-80; Nord Electro 4D; Spacestation V3 or Traynor K4
HOME: Yamaha S90ES; Hammond XK3C & Neo Vent; Roland Fantom X7; Arp Odyssey
QUIK-LOK X STANDS!

Top
#2829567 - 01/19/17 07:41 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: wineandkeyz]
J. Dan Offline
Bannination Free Since '08
10k Club

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 11124
Loc: St. Louis, MO
It says specifically in the video that it has an internal power supply (at 2:30).


Edited by J. Dan (01/19/17 07:42 PM)
_________________________
Dan

Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth.

Top
#2829568 - 01/19/17 07:42 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: wineandkeyz]
Ross Ward Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 02/07/09
Posts: 190
Loc: Tulsa, OK
Dave talks about it around 2:30 in the video up top – no more wall wart.

Dan beat me to it!


Edited by Ross Ward (01/19/17 07:42 PM)
Edit Reason: Beat to the punch!

Top
#2829625 - 01/20/17 02:41 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Ross Ward]
TomKittel Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/09/13
Posts: 451
Behringer will hate this.

Top
#2829630 - 01/20/17 04:34 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: TomKittel]
joegerardi Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 01/04/01
Posts: 2099
Loc: Savannah,GA,UNITED STATES
Awesome announcement- my nipples are hard!

;D

..Joe
_________________________
Setup: Korg Kronos 61, Roland XV-88, Korg Triton-Rack, Motif-Rack, Korg N1r, Alesis QSR, Roland M-GS64 Yamaha KX-88, KX76, Roland Super-JX, E-Mu Longboard 61, Kawai K1II, Kawai K4.

Top
#2829631 - 01/20/17 04:37 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: TomKittel]
DanL Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 09/22/05
Posts: 3968
Loc: DE
I don't know why Behringer would hate this. The Deepmind seems more like a souped up Juno 106. It's what, half the price? They'll sell a bunch of them. The DSI is more of a pro level instrument in my opinion.
_________________________
Live: Roland FA-08, Nord Electro 5d Nord Lead A1
Toys: Novation Ultranova, Moog LP, Roland SP-404SX, Roland JX10,Emu MK6
www.bksband.com
www.echoesrocks.com

Top
#2829642 - 01/20/17 05:23 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DanL]
MorayM Offline
Platinum Member

Registered: 09/05/13
Posts: 1323
Loc: Wilts, UK
Oh man, this thing is almost my perfect polysynth*! Now will anyone want my P08 rack?

* for that kind of money
_________________________
North Haverbrook - Godsticks - SoundCloud

Top
#2829760 - 01/20/17 11:58 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: MorayM]
David R Offline
Platinum Member

Registered: 05/30/03
Posts: 1094
Loc: Montreal, QC
Seriously GASsing for this now.
_________________________
My Site
"Speak up & be true or shut up & go to bed." Kerouac

Logic 9, Mainstage 2, Kontakt 5, AAS & Arturia stuff, fingers, pencil, paper.

Top
#2829928 - 01/21/17 06:44 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: David R]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
NAMM attendees: Could you ask DSI if Rev 2 has true bypass of effects?

Thank you.

Top
#2829946 - 01/21/17 08:37 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DanL]
DicemLabs.com Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 4884
Loc: Orlando, Florida
Originally Posted By: DanL
I don't know why Behringer would hate this. The Deepmind seems more like a souped up Juno 106. It's what, half the price? They'll sell a bunch of them. The DSI is more of a pro level instrument in my opinion.


I think you're right about Behringer selling a ton of DM12 and the Rev 2 being more of a pro-level instrument. But.. I think Tom also has a point.

If Behringer is planning a flagship analog to top the DM12 they will have to dig down deep to compete with the Rev 2. Add 4 more voices, another octave, a higher quality build, etc to the DM-12 and they will probably be pushing $1500. For $500 more I think a lot of people would opt of the Rev 2. Just my 2 cents and worth exactly that. smile

Top
#2829949 - 01/21/17 08:41 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DicemLabs.com]
CEB Offline
10k Club

Registered: 06/03/09
Posts: 12490
This thing sounds Yuge.
_________________________
"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!
So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

Top
#2830072 - 01/21/17 06:40 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: CEB]
David Emm Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 09/14/12
Posts: 941
Loc: On Mars, due to GPS error
Two words: Sweet Spot. The last few years have seen some impressive tools come along, but even the downright skeery Prophet 12 didn't quite speak to me personally. This one, though... yeah, I'd make the leap. In my way of working, it would sit to one side like a secret weapon, for many of the more organic things that tend to come from hardware, not quite touchable with samples. I had a pair of Prophets years ago, so that sound is in my bones. It feels capital-R Right. I was drawn to the Prophet-6, but for me, the REV 2 has far bigger shoulders. Now I have to wrestle with this vs. some key new software and an iguana.
_________________________
For Halloween, I'm going to be That Hateful Neighbor With The Hose. Off my lawn, you parasitic urchins!

https://soundcloud.com/david-emm-1




Top
#2830081 - 01/21/17 08:35 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: matted stump]
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 08/31/08
Posts: 3899
Loc: out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: mate stubb
If they had put the filter chain from the Pro 2 in it instead of the Curtis filter, I would not be able to resist.

Very nice specs!


Well, the filter is what it is since the Prophet 08 and the REV2 as well are basicly "synths on a chip",- like the Oberheim Matrix-1000, using the CEM 3396 "synth on a chip" was.

The chip used in several DSI synths is the Curtis PA397,- a repack of the CEM 3396 in surface mount format.

Itīs very easy creating analog polysynths w/ this chip.
The solution, for a manufacturer, is cheap and effective.

I wonīt say itīs bad or sounds bad,- itīs all matter of taste at the end of the day, isnīt it ?

OTOH, "synth on a chip" was never what we expected soundwise from real flagship analog synths in the past.
Who had the cash bought Prophet-5 or Prophet T-8 as also Oberheim OBX, OBXa, OB-8, Matrix-12 and/or Xpander,- before jumping on a Matrix-1000.

I dunno whatīs inside a Prophet-6,- but there might be a difference ... (I hope there is !).

Now when comparing to the "kind of Juno clone" Behringer DM12, the filter is soundwise the more interesting,- at least for me.

Juno 6, 60 and 106 all had pretty much the same filter design.

Juno 6 and Juno 60:
4x OTA integrated in IR3109 (IC),- like Jupiter-8 !
My MKS80rev4 had the same filter too, so I know how it sounded.

Juno 106:
4x OTA in a 80017a chip which is very similar to the IR3109.

It seems thatīs what "inspired" the designers of the DM12,- or is closely modelled, so to say.

IMO, the Behringer DM12 will definitely sell to those loving the "rolandish" filter sound while DSI REV2 will sell to those who prefer more polyphony over sound for a lower price and/or prefer that Curtis filter sound coming from that "synth on a chip".
It seems there are some out there who do.

Another reason might be the lower price vs. the Prophet-6.

But I also imagine, who doesnīt own a vintage Prophet 5 and prefers buying new over buying used expensive vintage and can afford,- he will still buy a Prophet-6 and will be satisfied w/ 6 analog voices.

A.C.

Top
#2830089 - 01/21/17 09:30 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: David Emm]
DicemLabs.com Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 4884
Loc: Orlando, Florida
Originally Posted By: David Emm
even the downright skeery Prophet 12 didn't quite speak to me personally.


The P12 is kind of unique in the whole DSI lineup. The oscillators aren't just digitally controlled... they ARE digital. Plus there's a lot of very complex modulation options. It's a sound designer's dream, but it is also harder to program than a straight-up analog. Some people love the P12 for it's complexity, others want something more "immediate".. which is what I think the Rev 2 is going to provide.

Top
#2830092 - 01/21/17 10:40 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DicemLabs.com]
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club

Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 11109
Originally Posted By: Al Coda
"synth on a chip" was never what we expected soundwise from real flagship analog synths in the past.
...
I dunno whatīs inside a Prophet-6,- but there might be a difference ... (I hope there is !).


Originally Posted By: DulceLabs.com
The P12 is kind of unique in the whole DSI lineup. The oscillators aren't just digitally controlled... they ARE digital. Plus there's a lot of very complex modulation options. It's a sound designer's dream, but it is also harder to program than a straight-up analog. Some people love the P12 for it's complexity, others want something more "immediate".. which is what I think the Rev 2 is going to provide.


There's a good chart at
https://www.davesmithinstruments.com/wp-...-3.0.pdf?a7b05e

If you want discrete analog (non-Curtis) filter and also analog oscillators, the only options there are Prophet 6 or the OB6.

As for figuring out which ones are more "immediate" and which are more "deep", a shortcut for that might be just looking at how many mod sources/destinations, LFOs, and envelopes there are...?
_________________________
Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!

Top
#2830102 - 01/22/17 03:58 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: AnotherScott]
J. Dan Offline
Bannination Free Since '08
10k Club

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 11124
Loc: St. Louis, MO
I think all the DM12 would need is to be bitimbral and add an octave for no more than another $500 to be more than competitive.
_________________________
Dan

Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth.

Top
#2830165 - 01/22/17 11:32 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: J. Dan]
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 08/31/08
Posts: 3899
Loc: out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: J. Dan
I think all the DM12 would need is to be bitimbral and add an octave for no more than another $500 to be more than competitive.


It wonīt last for long and weīll see more and different designs.
Itīs just only the beginning.
Not only Behringer will come up w/ something bigger, DSI will too, Iīm sure.
Itīs easy,- p.ex. take a wider case, put in an 61-keys synth action and 2 of the sound engine boards piggy bag style,- and w/ some firmware/OS update youīll have a machine for bi-timbral splits and layers and twice the polyphony.
Kind of JX-10/MKS-70 where you found 2x JX8P inside.
Same would work for the DSI/Sequential Prophet-xx and DSI Oberheim OB-xx.

A.C.

Top
#2830173 - 01/22/17 12:01 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Al Coda]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
Yes, it's on.

The X factor are market tastes, trends. Explorations and tried & true.

Top
#2830177 - 01/22/17 12:07 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
Is someone willing to give me a synopsis on the differences between the chips between Prophet 6 and Prophet '08?

I've read things like:
Prophet '08:
- "synth on a chip"
- filter & VCA together

Prophet 6:
discrete.

___
What is discrete?
---
I know Voyager's circuit board is larger than a Prophet '08's board.
I know Moog System 15 is larger than Voyager.
I believe the new Model D have larger parts than a Voyager.

Where do the Prophet 6 parts fall into that scheme? I would imagine smaller than new Model D.

--
I assume, the larger the part, the more "discrete", ... the better tone.

---

And then somewhere, there's a connection to less latency. I am talking about latency under 1ms. Not perceptible to most. But, present. And, important to some.

Top
#2830180 - 01/22/17 12:20 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
J. Dan Offline
Bannination Free Since '08
10k Club

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 11124
Loc: St. Louis, MO
Discrete just refers to using individual components (transistors, etc) to build the circuit as opposed to using and integrated circuit (chip). An integrated circuit could theoretically contain the exact same circuit as the one made from discrete components - the advantage being tighter tolerances in manufacturing, lower cost when mass produced, and smaller footprint. I don't know that there is necessarily anything magic about discrete components. Probably more a matter that people happen to prefer some of the historic designs that were discrete compared to others that happen to be IC's. Also, many manufacturers used some of the same chips, so the discrete designs may be more unique.
_________________________
Dan

Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth.

Top
#2830182 - 01/22/17 12:26 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: J. Dan]
ElmerJFudd Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 11/30/14
Posts: 5273
Loc: USA, greater NY area
_________________________
Live: Yamaha S90ES, Roland VR-700
Home: Rebuilt 1910 Chickering 5'2", Fender Rhodes MKI 88k

Top
#2830195 - 01/22/17 01:02 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: ElmerJFudd]
matted stump Offline
Grand Poobah of the Trebuchet
10k Club

Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 15347
Discrete also generally means easier to repair in 20 years. Custom synth chips may not continue to be made after a synth model is discontinued.

Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.

Don't know about that. The original Prophet 5 had 4 custom chips by SSM - a VCO, VCF, VCA, and TG (hardware envelope.) The filter design was new for its time, contained 4 operational transconductance amplifier cells, and was incredibly musical.

The new P6 recreates that filter using matched discrete transistors to recreate those OTA cells.
_________________________
Moe
---
Kawai Novus: "Please feel surprised even more."

http://www.hotrodmotm.com

Top
#2830208 - 01/22/17 01:28 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: matted stump]
J. Dan Offline
Bannination Free Since '08
10k Club

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 11124
Loc: St. Louis, MO
Yeah, there are definitely different levels of flexibility and availability.

At one end of the spectrum, you have synths like Andromeda using ASIC's (application specific integrated circuits). Completely custom made just for them. Expensive to produce, and once they're gone, they're gone.

Then you have chips like SSM and Curtis that, after going out of production, will eventually run out. But they were mass produced and there are a lot of them out there, along with companies who recover them from dead synths. I managed to source some SSM chips to repair my Jupiter 6 some years back. Compared to the ASIC example - cheaper, easier to get, but not customizable.

Then there are those who build the circuits around off-the-shelf OTA's like the CA3080 and LM13600 - not designed specifically for synths. Since they have such a wide range of uses in other applications, they're even cheaper and almost guaranteed not to go out of production.
_________________________
Dan

Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth.

Top
#2830262 - 01/22/17 05:27 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 08/31/08
Posts: 3899
Loc: out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: dsetto

I've read things like:
Prophet '08:
- "synth on a chip"
- filter & VCA together


Not only, itīs more,- DCO, filter and VCA together !

You can read it HERE
Itīs a microprocessor controlable chip, so the modifiers/modulation sources can be created in software.

I can buy a single vintage CEM3396 for about EUR 15,-.

Dunno what the reissue (DSI-PA397) costs.
DSI and another company are the only customers.
In large quantities it might cost only 5 bucks or less (just guessing !),- resulting in the basic 16 voices in a REV2 cost less than 100 bucks.

Well, when you have the chips you donīt have the machine assembled and working and there are costs for developement, design and other parts as well,- but you get the idea how itīs possible to sell a 16-voice analog keyboard-synth for less than 2K bucks today.

When realizing a 6-voice analog w/ discrete circuitry and the manufacturer is a small and idealistic boutique one, it will cost about 3.5K bucks.
The Obie OB-X like Relic-6 desktop module from Shearelectronics is such example.

So, DSI/Sequential Prophet-6 and DSI/ Oberheim OB-6, partially using discrete analog circuitry are already good deals for what they do.

Explanation of "discrete" already done by Dan and Moe above.

A.C.

Top
#2830317 - 01/22/17 09:04 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Al Coda]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
Thank you, guys! Great technical info. I'm gonna need a little time to absorb it. It's what I asked for.

Top
#2830627 - 01/24/17 05:49 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
Theo Verelst Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/27/10
Posts: 3618
Little remark about the analog chips in synthesizers. It's a certain amount of money to create the chip "plans", and then somehow it's a matter of getting production facility to actually make the chip as well as making sure it functions according to specs. Making a wafer for the chips is expensive. Someone needs to make sure that whole process is (co-) started and properly seen through up to putting the tested chips in a case. The advantage of using analog chips is that there are way smaller differences between the transistors on a chip than between discrete transistors from a box of the same kind. There are chips with only a few transistors on them for this reason. Another essential part for filters and oscillators, capacitors, cannot normally be put on a chip, so at least that is also needed discretely when using chip synth parts.

About the difference between the Rev2 and others: I've taken a little time to download some vids with it it and while contemplating on my final after-after post-processing for a good compromise remix setup for a lot of the A-grade materials I've tested to work with it, I've played some Rev2 (Rev-2 ?) through my setup and that turned out very interesting. Clear matches of the synth sound with the processing and much more smooth, musical and way funkier result!

Anyhow, after the bit of NSF type formulations: I think the P12 is more suitable for the big shows and lots of power in the PA system, but the Rev2 is interesting and also pretty varied.

T.

Top
#2830780 - 01/24/17 04:21 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Al Coda]
hardware Offline
Platinum Member

Registered: 03/04/14
Posts: 1059
Loc: Nashville, TN.
Originally Posted By: Al Coda
Originally Posted By: dsetto

I've read things like:
Prophet '08:
- "synth on a chip"
- filter & VCA together


Not only, itīs more,- DCO, filter and VCA together !

You can read it HERE
Itīs a microprocessor controlable chip, so the modifiers/modulation sources can be created in software.

I can buy a single vintage CEM3396 for about EUR 15,-.

Dunno what the reissue (DSI-PA397) costs.
DSI and another company are the only customers.
In large quantities it might cost only 5 bucks or less (just guessing !),- resulting in the basic 16 voices in a REV2 cost less than 100 bucks.

Well, when you have the chips you donīt have the machine assembled and working and there are costs for developement, design and other parts as well,- but you get the idea how itīs possible to sell a 16-voice analog keyboard-synth for less than 2K bucks today.

When realizing a 6-voice analog w/ discrete circuitry and the manufacturer is a small and idealistic boutique one, it will cost about 3.5K bucks.
The Obie OB-X like Relic-6 desktop module from Shearelectronics is such example.

So, DSI/Sequential Prophet-6 and DSI/ Oberheim OB-6, partially using discrete analog circuitry are already good deals for what they do.

Explanation of "discrete" already done by Dan and Moe above.

A.C.


The Relic 6 is awesome.
The way he can add "Spread" to 2 EGs on the VCF and get that swirl is incredible.
I want that black version and I hate desktop synths.

That's a fantastic sounding synth.
_________________________
Magnus C350 + FMR RNP + Realistic Unisphere Mic

Top
#2830856 - 01/25/17 05:35 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: matted stump]
marczellm Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 05/10/11
Posts: 771
Loc: Budapest, Hungary
Originally Posted By: mate stubb
Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.
That sounds like major bullshit.
_________________________
Life is subtractive.
Current: Jazz, funk, rock, pop, Christian worship, BebHop
Wishlist: 80s-ish (synth)pop, symphonic pop, prog rock, fusion, musical theatre
Gear: NS2 + JUNO-G


Top
#2830860 - 01/25/17 05:57 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: marczellm]
RABid Offline
10k Club

Registered: 11/01/01
Posts: 12092
I'm on the waiting list. Think it is time to sell off many of my other DSI synths and consolidate. The bad thing is the price on older model DSI's tend to fall pretty far. Guess that is an effect of them releasing so many new products.
_________________________
Skate to where the puck was 5 years ago.

Top
#2830864 - 01/25/17 06:10 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: marczellm]
DarkyLord Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/10/01
Posts: 5008
Loc: Springfield, Virginia
Originally Posted By: marczellm
Originally Posted By: mate stubb
Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.
That sounds like major bullshit.


Could be, but maybe not. Bigger/ballsier sound may result from larger discrete transistors/op amps that can be pushed into saturation which draw more current resulting in more thermal dissipation. More heat can be handled easier by using wider traces, larger parts, local heat sinks etc. But it depends on the specific component spec we're talking about. There are surface mounted parts (i.e. small) that handle larger currents than some discrete parts so it really depends on the design.

Top
#2830903 - 01/25/17 09:09 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DarkyLord]
matted stump Offline
Grand Poobah of the Trebuchet
10k Club

Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 15347
Originally Posted By: Markyboard
Originally Posted By: marczellm
Originally Posted By: mate stubb
Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.
That sounds like major bullshit.


Could be, but maybe not. Bigger/ballsier sound may result from larger discrete transistors/op amps that can be pushed into saturation which draw more current resulting in more thermal dissipation. More heat can be handled easier by using wider traces, larger parts, local heat sinks etc.


Exhibit one for those who believe this is the rebuilt Moog Modular. When Gene Stopp recreated it a couple of years ago, he made sure that all the wide paths of the circuit boards were recreated along with the original thru hole packaged components.

He knows a lot more about it than I do. The rebuilt machine sounds every bit as monstrous as the original.
_________________________
Moe
---
Kawai Novus: "Please feel surprised even more."

http://www.hotrodmotm.com

Top
#2830927 - 01/25/17 11:08 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: matted stump]
GhostlySilver Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 5440
Loc: Washington DC
Originally Posted By: mate stubb


Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.


This reminds me Alexander Dumble's infamous "electrons in a crystal lattice" quote. Luckily for him, his amps are best known for being used by great players (Larry Carlton, Robben Ford, etc.), not for the crystal lattice thing.
_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/governorsilver

Top
#2830930 - 01/25/17 11:10 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Al Coda]
GhostlySilver Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/22/06
Posts: 5440
Loc: Washington DC
Originally Posted By: Al Coda

When realizing a 6-voice analog w/ discrete circuitry and the manufacturer is a small and idealistic boutique one, it will cost about 3.5K bucks.
The Obie OB-X like Relic-6 desktop module from Shearelectronics is such example.


Practically deserves its own thread. I hope the kid does well.

_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/governorsilver

Top
#2831048 - 01/25/17 05:56 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DarkyLord]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
Originally Posted By: Markyboard
Originally Posted By: marczellm
Originally Posted By: mate stubb
Some people claim that discrete sounds bigger and more ballsy because the electron paths are wider than in a complex chip with shrunken gates.
That sounds like major bullshit.


Could be, but maybe not. Bigger/ballsier sound may result from larger discrete transistors/op amps that can be pushed into saturation which draw more current resulting in more thermal dissipation. More heat can be handled easier by using wider traces, larger parts, local heat sinks etc. But it depends on the specific component spec we're talking about. There are surface mounted parts (i.e. small) that handle larger currents than some discrete parts so it really depends on the design.


I think there is something going on. I can't assess the validity of this, but I like it's attempt to explain it.

To me, there are two fundamental aspects.
- Timbre
- Response speed

My comparisons are not vast. They mainly include:
- Brief moment on a current Moog Model 15
- Lots of time on a Voyager
- brief moments on a Prophet '08, Prophet 6, OB-6

I've seen the innards of the Voyager, a System 55. Somewhere I remember figuring a Voyager innard is larger than a Prophet '08. And, I believe the current Model D has larger parts than a Voyager.

I know the timbre of a Model 15 was amazing. I know the timbre & responsiveness of the Voyager felt more direct & faster than a Prophet '08. (Very unscientific, and with time in between.) I know the timbre of the OB-6 & Prophet 6 are nice.

So, that's why I've come to the unscientific conclusion that larger parts may lead to more satisfying timbre.
As far as Response Speed - I believe that's a matter of a lack of digital, or slow digital parts.

But, I really have no idea.

Top
#2831049 - 01/25/17 05:58 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
So, while I remain intrigued about this - I'm not basing my decision on it. I really want my first polyphonic analog. I'm finally ready for one. And there are great choices today. I'm going for 5 octaves, bi-timbral, plenty of voices, & programmability to explore for a long time. I'm not going for highly refined or high character timbre.

Top
#2831055 - 01/25/17 06:33 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
J. Dan Offline
Bannination Free Since '08
10k Club

Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 11124
Loc: St. Louis, MO
Yeah u know it could also just be that discrete components, with wider tolerances, just have more variance. Just like how randomness between oscillators when blended create a "fatter" sound, there could be some of that in okay with filters as well. The imperfections could be what make it sound pleasing. Chips have tighter tolerances and greater repeatability.
_________________________
Dan

Acoustic/Electric stringed instruments ranging from 4 to 230 strings, hammered, picked, fingered, slapped, and plucked. Analog and Digital Electronic instruments, reeds, and throat/mouth.

Top
#2831070 - 01/25/17 07:16 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 08/31/08
Posts: 3899
Loc: out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: dsetto


... 5 octaves, bi-timbral, plenty of voices, & programmability to explore for a long time.


Youīll need at least 8 voices,- better 12,- for satisfying polyphonic bi-timbrality !

The Oberheim Xpander is 6-voice and 6-part multitimbral.
The advantage is, you can define how many voices will play in the upper and lower parts of the keyboard when creating a 2-part split patch.

But w/ many other synths, when you pressed the DUAL/SPLIT button(s), it was always half of the voices in the lower and the other half of the voices in the upper part of the keyboard.
The only options were setting upper and/or lower parts to monophonic or unison, but you didnīt save any voices for the other part.

In the Xpander there are quasi 6 monophonic synths and in Matrix-12 there are ... well ... 12.

That "Multi-Patch Mode" in Xpander and Matrix-12 was/is really cool īcause you assign the same Single-Patch to as many voices as you want for that timbre and have the other voices for other timbres/patches freely assignable as well.
Different keyboard trigger and voice assignment modes for each part come in addition.

Among other important features, I really miss that kind of access to the single voices in all the new poly-analogues out there, may it be DSI, Sequential or Tom Oberheim stuff.

But they all know how it worked in the past and let us wait now the same way they already did in the past as well.

You get your flagship analogue in snippets ...
This one has only 1 LFO, the next one will get 2 and 3 ENVs instead of only 2 and so on.
Buy 3 or 4 smaller ones before youīll get access to the full featured toy in future.
It might need years until Iīd get again what I already had decades ago.
Possibly I donīt need that anymore then because of age.

But when the renaissance of analog will continue, they all will come w/ reissues of their old big flagship synths, then bundled w/ modern technology FX and some more modulations.
The only question is WHEN.

A.C.

Top
#2831122 - 01/26/17 02:57 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
DarkyLord Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/10/01
Posts: 5008
Loc: Springfield, Virginia
Originally Posted By: dsetto
I'm not going for highly refined or high character timbre.


Then you might also consider a VA. I do think the Rev2 sounded great when I tried it out and may be an excellent choice based on your criteria. Not as deep programming wise as you may want, thus the VA suggestion.

Top
#2831158 - 01/26/17 06:26 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DarkyLord]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
J. Dan, 'wider tolerance->more variance' is an intriguing theory.
AC, thanks. There are lots of synths on the horizon.
Markyboard, I hear you. For my first one - and only one for a long time- if I can, I'm going with DSI's latest practical analog. I think it'll inform me on the observations I've posted here.

Top
#2831164 - 01/26/17 06:56 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
DarkyLord Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/10/01
Posts: 5008
Loc: Springfield, Virginia
Originally Posted By: dsetto
J. Dan, 'wider tolerance->more variance' is an intriguing theory.


Anyone who's been involved with electronic circuit design knows this to make sense from an engineering perspective.

Originally Posted By: dsetto

Markyboard, I hear you. For my first one - and only one for a long time- if I can, I'm going with DSI's latest practical analog. I think it'll inform me on the observations I've posted here.


I think you will be quite pleased. One thing often overlooked is the keybed which can make or break the experience. The Rev2 uses the Fatar Tp9/s which has a fantastic feel and response to velocity and after touch.

Top
#2831338 - 01/26/17 05:06 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: DarkyLord]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
I appreciate good keybeds. I'm tuned in to keyboard manufacturers that use them. It's part of my purchase-radar stats.

Top
#2831728 - 01/28/17 12:12 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
Spotting Jonah Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/18/13
Posts: 82
Loc: Northern California
Originally Posted By: dsetto
I appreciate good keybeds. I'm tuned in to keyboard manufacturers that use them. It's part of my purchase-radar stats.


Couldn't agree more. I've returned great sounding synths because the keybed was horrible.
_________________________
~ That guy

Top
#2836531 - 02/17/17 08:46 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Spotting Jonah]
Spotting Jonah Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/18/13
Posts: 82
Loc: Northern California
Am I seeing things, or did DSI just switch out the first look of the REV2, ominously absent any reference to the name "Prophet", and replace it with a very prominent "Prophet" name on it?
_________________________
~ That guy

Top
#2836532 - 02/17/17 08:51 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Spotting Jonah]
Spotting Jonah Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/18/13
Posts: 82
Loc: Northern California
http://www.emusician.com/Portals/3/StandardImage/REV2_Front-Angle.jpg

https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/REV2-16

I wonder if that was always planned, or a response to feedback. Anyone know the back story?
_________________________
~ That guy

Top
#2836541 - 02/17/17 09:59 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: Spotting Jonah]
count doerflera Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 12/27/12
Posts: 6260
Loc: thin ice
at least it still has 5 octaves. thu
_________________________
I need to practice more than I do, and that will make my current gear - first rate, by any measure - sound even better than it already does.
Tim Wat

Top
#2836611 - 02/18/17 07:42 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: count doerflera]
joegerardi Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 01/04/01
Posts: 2099
Loc: Savannah,GA,UNITED STATES
Originally Posted By: davedoerfler
at least it still has 5 octaves. thu


And thank God for that!

..Joe
_________________________
Setup: Korg Kronos 61, Roland XV-88, Korg Triton-Rack, Motif-Rack, Korg N1r, Alesis QSR, Roland M-GS64 Yamaha KX-88, KX76, Roland Super-JX, E-Mu Longboard 61, Kawai K1II, Kawai K4.

Top
#2862177 - 06/22/17 05:31 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: joegerardi]
ElmerJFudd Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 11/30/14
Posts: 5273
Loc: USA, greater NY area
_________________________
Live: Yamaha S90ES, Roland VR-700
Home: Rebuilt 1910 Chickering 5'2", Fender Rhodes MKI 88k

Top
#2862179 - 06/22/17 06:14 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: ElmerJFudd]
RudyS Online   content
Platinum Member

Registered: 11/06/02
Posts: 1932
Loc: Groningen, The netherlands
A, coincidence. I was just hit by a GAS attack and checking youtube clips of the REV 2. My piano teacher had the original P08, and I always found it a bit static somehow. Maybe it's my imagination, but on the clips the P08 sounds better. Might also be the effects.

That bladerunner patch n the clip above however doesn't give me the shivers as the original.
_________________________
Rudy

Stuff: Nord Electro 3, Casio PX5s, DSI Mopho keys, Nord Lead A1, Korg N5, Korg Poly 61, QSC K10 and a Shure SM58.

Top
#2862181 - 06/22/17 06:39 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: RudyS]
DarkyLord Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 02/10/01
Posts: 5008
Loc: Springfield, Virginia
IMO DSI has their own unique flavor of analog, call it "clean" analog. Sounds great and it's a very versatile utilitarian synth. I think it sounds best when not trying to make it sound vintage/dirty/sloppy which always sounds artificial and often overdone to me.

Top
#2862212 - 06/22/17 08:30 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: J. Dan]
stillearning Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 06/27/13
Posts: 305
Originally Posted By: J. Dan
Yeah u know it could also just be that discrete components, with wider tolerances, just have more variance. Just like how randomness between oscillators when blended create a "fatter" sound, there could be some of that in okay with filters as well. The imperfections could be what make it sound pleasing. Chips have tighter tolerances and greater repeatability.


This is it in a nutshell.
_________________________
What an elegantly put phrase. New sig time!

Top
#2880869 - 09/22/17 07:09 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: stillearning]
CEB Offline
10k Club

Registered: 06/03/09
Posts: 12490
_________________________
"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!
So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

Top
#2881028 - 09/22/17 04:07 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: CEB]
count doerflera Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 12/27/12
Posts: 6260
Loc: thin ice
yeah, he sucks. grin

If you click on sub titles and auto translate Japenese to English it's even better. roll
_________________________
I need to practice more than I do, and that will make my current gear - first rate, by any measure - sound even better than it already does.
Tim Wat

Top
#2881031 - 09/22/17 04:15 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: count doerflera]
CEB Offline
10k Club

Registered: 06/03/09
Posts: 12490
I've never tried that. Nihongo has so MANY homophones I don't see how that could work. Could be interesting. laugh


Edited by CEB (09/22/17 04:15 PM)
_________________________
"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!
So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

Top
#2881346 - 09/24/17 06:15 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: CEB]
yamarolorg Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 02/12/14
Posts: 137
Loc: BC, Canada
Just pulled the trigger on the REV 2 (8 voice). Hopefully, it's here by next Friday. My first analogue poly synth. smile
_________________________
Main Gear: Moog Slim Phatty, DSI Mopho, Yamaha MoX6, Alchemy, Roland Gaia, Pianissimo, VB3 organ, GSI Burn,

Top
#2881363 - 09/24/17 08:39 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: yamarolorg]
count doerflera Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 12/27/12
Posts: 6260
Loc: thin ice
Originally Posted By: yamarolorg
My first analogue poly synth. smile


Welcome, grasshopper. twothumbs
You will now have many days go by and wonder where they went as you are lost in the bliss. wink
_________________________
I need to practice more than I do, and that will make my current gear - first rate, by any measure - sound even better than it already does.
Tim Wat

Top
#2881583 - 09/25/17 10:45 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: count doerflera]
dsetto Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 01/28/15
Posts: 511
Loc: Los Angeles
Stilllearning- thanks for highlighting J.Dan's thoughts. I'm gonna file this as the answer.

Top
#2884622 - 10/12/17 09:13 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: dsetto]
CEB Offline
10k Club

Registered: 06/03/09
Posts: 12490
_________________________
"It doesn't have to be difficult to be cool" - Mitch Towne

"A great musician can bring tears to your eyes!!!
So can a auto Mechanic." - Stokes Hunt

Top
#2884688 - 10/12/17 06:40 PM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: CEB]
RABid Offline
10k Club

Registered: 11/01/01
Posts: 12092
How does the Rev 2 compare to the Prophet 6? Does anyone here have both?
_________________________
Skate to where the puck was 5 years ago.

Top
#2884757 - 10/13/17 05:54 AM Re: DSI Rev 2 [Re: RABid]
Jason Fry Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/15
Posts: 29
Loc: Pennsylvania
There's a wonderful Youtube series comparing the Prophet 6 and the Prophet '08. Obviously the Rev2 has several additions which make it better than the '08, but the basic engine is the same. (I currently have a a Rev2 and Prophet '08, as well as a Tetra, etc.)

For a quick, simple answer: the Prophet 6 is easier to get great sounds out of and has slightly better sounding oscillators. The Rev2 is much more powerful, which can make it sound better when programmed well. I prefer the Rev2 for a number of reasons including the longer keyboard, spits, layers, more LFO's, etc. But if you are interested, watch Starsky's videos. Also check out the synth comparison chart.

https://www.davesmithinstruments.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DSI-Synth-Comparison-Chart-4.0.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BP0Z_YWvU7E

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >


Moderator:  Grave Bryce, Stephen Fortner