Music Player Network Home Guitar Player Magazine Keyboard Magazine Bass Player Magazine EQ Magazine
Page 4 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >
Topic Options
#2830937 - 01/25/17 11:31 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
bennyray Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 12/06/14
Posts: 729
Loc: USA
I really like the piano sounds and Eps. I think this will be a huge seller for piano players. I am sure the action is nice as well. It should be competitive with Nord pianos if not better.
_________________________
Korg Kronos 2 88, Nord Electro 5D 73, Yamaha S90es, Korg CX3, Roland D-70

Top
KC Island
#2830959 - 01/25/17 12:14 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: bennyray]
Dave Ferris Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/05/07
Posts: 5505
Loc: Glendale, Ca.
It definitely plays nicer, and for me, sounds better then the NP3. I can see only the CP4 as the main competitor. And then you're into the weight consideration - 48 lbs. for the Roland and 38 for the Yamaha. And of course tonal preference.

From my first play with it , I'd have a hard time saying which one would take "second place" - they're both that good.

Needless to say it would take having them next to each other for an extended period of time, in addition to using them on the gig, to really hone in on which one you would feel a closer connection with.

Or you could just like them both equally well.


Edited by Dave Ferris (01/25/17 12:21 PM)
_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/dave-ferris

2005 NY Steinway D
Yamaha CP4, CP5

Top
#2830973 - 01/25/17 12:52 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
Mark Schmieder Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 8145
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
Oh, so that's good to know that this is the first version to included modeled V-Piano sounds.

I recently re-tried a current Roland Digital Piano though, and couldn't get on with the phasiness -- has this been corrected? Granted, it is a problem in most digital pianos, but software VST's have gotten past this by now.
_________________________
60th P-Bass, Select J-Bass, Geddy Lee J-Bass, Yamaha BB1025X
Eugenio Upright, Viking Bari, Select Strat, Select Tele, Am Pro JM, LP 57 Gold Top
Yamaha WX5, Hammond XK1c, Moog Voyager, DSI Prophet12

Top
#2832657 - 02/01/17 11:18 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Mark Schmieder]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29

Top
#2832758 - 02/01/17 07:02 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
jahfume Offline
Member

Registered: 11/20/12
Posts: 10
Loc: Oxon

Dont waste 10 minutes of your life looking at the first video - its a room recording and sounds like an-other or any-other DP.

Sound on the second Vid is good and direct from the RD I think.

The EP's on the funky jazz piece at 6.25 sound a lot spunkier than they do on the RD800.
Rhodes 1 at 7.05 and Rhodes 2 at 7.50 are prety dyr and sound good. The Wurlie at 8.50 I hav'nt been able to coax out of the RD800 it has a great thewack!

Anyone agree! wave

Dont remember Roland boasting too much about the EP's in thier promo.

Top
#2833204 - 02/03/17 04:53 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: jahfume]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29

Top
#2833223 - 02/03/17 06:13 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
rickzjamm Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 11/05/13
Posts: 656
Has the organ been improved or is it the same as the RD-800?
_________________________
Plan your work & work your plan.

Top
#2833246 - 02/03/17 08:48 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: rickzjamm]
Moonglow Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/15/03
Posts: 4429
Loc: Northwest Indiana
I don't know if the organs are the same as the RD-800, but in my brief audition of the organs in the RD-2000 at NAMM they didn't seem to be much, if any, improvement over the Jupiter-80 organs. Overall, I did not find them to be all that inspiring.
_________________________
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing."
- George Bernard Shaw

Top
#2833262 - 02/04/17 02:08 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Dave Ferris]
vanderSchoot Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 12/24/10
Posts: 543
Loc: The Netherlands
Originally Posted By: Dave Ferris
It definitely plays nicer, and for me, sounds better then the NP3. I can see only the CP4 as the main competitor. And then you're into the weight consideration - 48 lbs. for the Roland and 38 for the Yamaha. And of course tonal preference.

From my first play with it , I'd have a hard time saying which one would take "second place" - they're both that good.

Needless to say it would take having them next to each other for an extended period of time, in addition to using them on the gig, to really hone in on which one you would feel a closer connection with.

Or you could just like them both equally well.

With all due respect, i know you are a fan of the CP4 and have a love / (but even more) hate relationship with Nord,........ i think you should give Nord a little bit more credits.
Yes, i know about the top end lacking in some models etc.......but you can't deny a certain organic sound and ''realness'' (both in recordings and the FOH) can you ? I think both Yamaha and Roland lack that specific charactarisation.(organic and real)

I am ''fulltime'' prof. pianotuner for 28 years that knows a thing or two about actions and "piano sounds".
Only the Kawai high- end actions starting from the MP9000 resemble a real action due to it's real hammer throw.(althaugh the hammer itself is a placebo)
Roland, Yamaha and Fatar use another approach that some like more than the other. However the actions are not really an accurate immitation of what happens in a real action.
I for one think , apart from Kawai, that all fall short actionwise, also because i use a Kawai
as reference myself and mostly end up in disbelief trying out the new PHA-50 and the equivalents from other brands.
They are playable actions for sure, but they don't feel like grand piano actions.
The fatar in the Nord piano 3 is as capable as the Yamaha CP4 and both have an artificial feel that would drive me nuts if those were my only practice boards.
I have played a Nord Stage for years LIVE and i must say i got better with it over time, up to the point i kinda liked it's action.

For sounds i put Nord on top, mainly because of the different piano flavours andorganic sound, Roland still sounds kinda plastic, althaugh extremely playable !! and Yamaha ........ well i use the Garritan CFX for more than a year now and the CP4's CFX sample is like going back in time when memory was expensive and we only had 25+ Mb for our pianosamples and had to be carefull what to sample..... .

You make money and beautifull music with your CP4 and therefor it deserves the credits of a very capable board alone,......


Edited by vanderSchoot (02/04/17 05:56 AM)

Top
#2833380 - 02/04/17 02:30 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: vanderSchoot]
Dave Ferris Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/05/07
Posts: 5505
Loc: Glendale, Ca.
Originally Posted By: vanderSchoot
With all due respect, i know you are a fan of the CP4 and have a love / (but even more) hate relationship with Nord,........ i think you should give Nord a little bit more credits.
Yes, i know about the top end lacking in some models etc.......but you can't deny a certain organic sound and ''realness'' (both in recordings and the FOH) can you ? I think both Yamaha and Roland lack that specific charactarisation.(organic and real).


I do give Nord credit for creating and expanding their niche market.. They are a small, independent company that has an extensive base of people that love and will play nothing but their instruments. Hats off to these people !! I'm simply not one of them.
Can't say I didn't try for 4 years with the NP88 & NP2. And the time I've spent writing about it here - I probably could have learned another Chopin Etude. wink deadhorse

Your "organic' and "realness" is my harsh, too bright, clangy, uneven and un-natural sounding. Yes, they are present and clear on recordings and cut through a rock mix well. But I was never happy with the sound coming through my speakers on gigs…even on rock gigs. I couple "that sound" (which I know all too well ) with the very sub-par Fatar action -- and I feel like I'm struggling and compromising even that much more playing something that's trying to imitate a piano. Basically for me this = no fun.

Actually having the NP2 and CP4 next to each other in my studio for 4 months gave me the chance to really hear how thin the Nord pianos were next to the CFX. I had an engineer friend over (with very big ears) who mixes and masters for major labels. I played both through my RCF TT08As with my JMK Audio JM-110 di/pre. He confirmed my impressions - the Yamaha CFX and CF grands sounded much more rich, full AND realistic then the Nord.

Originally Posted By: vanderSchoot
I am ''fulltime'' prof. pianotuner for 28 years that knows a thing or two about actions and "piano sounds"...


I see. Well I'm actually a piano player - for almost 50 years. 35 of those years I've been fortunate enough to practice on 3 top quality grands daily - Yamaha C7E, Yamaha S6 and Steinway D. If you add up the thousands of practice hours I've logged at home, plus the time in recording studios , concerts, clubs and casuals on every conceivable brand and model of piano (ranging from great to brutal) - basically I feel I have a pretty good understanding of what sounds and plays good. Most certainly I know what I like and don't like.

We do agree that Kawai makes the best action in a stage piano - the MP11. But so what ! For gigs , at 72 lbs., who's going to schlep that beast ?!

Originally Posted By: vanderSchoot
They are playable actions for sure, but they don't feel like grand piano actions.The fatar in the Nord piano 3 is as capable as the Yamaha CP4 .


NONE of them feel like grand piano actions !! Even the MP11 ! The only thing that's close is the Avant Grand.

Regarding the NP3 & CP4 action. Well, we must be playing different instruments or have a different way of measuring "playability". While the NP3 action does improve matters from their previous models, there's no question to my ears and hands which one I feel a closer pianistic connection with. I've never played a weighted piano Fatar action keyboard - Nord or Kurzweil- that I felt was on par with Yamaha , and to a lesser extent , Roland. For me there's ALWAYS that clunkiness factor involved with any keyboard that is Fatar.

Originally Posted By: vanderSchoot
You make money and beautifull music with your CP4 and therefor it deserves the credits of a very capable board alone,......


I'd like to think it's the player that (hopefully) makes the "beautiful music", not the electronic keyboard. I feel the more skilled the player is, the better he/she is equipped to overcome the shortcomings and compromises inherent with an electronic keyboard - at least one that attempts to emulate an acoustic piano. wink

But thanks for your comment. smile


Edited by Dave Ferris (02/04/17 08:33 PM)
Edit Reason: added thought
_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/dave-ferris

2005 NY Steinway D
Yamaha CP4, CP5

Top
#2833386 - 02/04/17 02:48 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Dave Ferris]
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club

Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 11109
Originally Posted By: Dave Ferris
NONE of them feel like grand piano actions !! Even the MP11 !

Reminds me of a funny thing I noticed... When I first played an MP10, I had the feeling that it was a substantial, high quality action, but heavier/sluggish compared to a real grand. As it happens, not long after, I played a wedding gig where I used the house baby grand for cocktail hour, which happened to be a Kawai, and as soon as I played it, I thought, a-ha! This is why the MP10 feels that way! ;-)
_________________________
Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!

Top
#2833391 - 02/04/17 03:37 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: AnotherScott]
Dave Ferris Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/05/07
Posts: 5505
Loc: Glendale, Ca.
Yeah I've found the Kawai action ( at least in the older pianos ) to be generally heavier then Yamahas. Of course any action when regulated can have less friction in it. But when a piano is left not maintained for a long period of time, I've found that Yamahas fare better in the action. But Kawais keep their tonal integrity longer - less bright and metallic.

OT- I played a Kawai Shigeru SK-7 (7'6") at NAMM that was over the top, out of this world ! I preferred it to the Bechsteins and other European pianos I played.
_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/dave-ferris

2005 NY Steinway D
Yamaha CP4, CP5

Top
#2833400 - 02/04/17 05:01 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Dave Ferris]
vanderSchoot Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 12/24/10
Posts: 543
Loc: The Netherlands
Originally Posted By: Dave Ferris

I do give Nord credit for creating and expanding their niche market.. They are a small, independent company that has an extensive base of people that love and will play nothing but their instruments. Hats off to these people !! I'm simply not one of them.
Can't say I didn't try for 4 years with the NP88 & NP2. And the time I've spent writing about it here - I probably could have learned another Chopin Etude. wink deadhorse

Hahahaha....that was funny !!
Quote:

Your "organic' and "realness" is my harsh, too bright, clanky, uneven and un-natural sounding. Yes, they are present and clear on recordings and cut through a rock mix well. But I was never happy with the sound coming through my speakers on gigs…even on rock gigs. I couple "that sound" (which I know all too well ) with the very sub-par Fatar action -- and I feel like I'm struggling and compromising even that much more playing something that's trying to imitate a piano. Basically for me this = no fun.

The Silver grand (Kawai sample) was Nord's best offering for live use in my opinion (both sound and playability),.....i cannot recall a post where you commented on that specific sound....
I found it much, much better than the Italian grand and the bright grand..
When i mainly used the Bright grand i purchased an Integra7 and was surprised how much better the fatar action played when triggering the Integra7. The Silver grand also plays way better than previous renderings.
Quote:

Actually having the NP2 and CP4 next to each other in my studio for 4 months gave me the chance to really hear how thin the Nord pianos were next to the CFX. I had an engineer friend over (with very big ears) who mixes and masters for major labels. I played both through my RCF TT08As with my JMK Audio JM-110 di/pre. He confirmed my impressions - the Yamaha CFX and CF grands sounded much more rich, full AND realistic then the Nord.

I only used my Nord through a MS KP500SN and got lots of positive feedback from the audience and sound crew.
I played the CP 4 at Namm '14 and on several occasions in music stores.
Coming from a P120 long ago, i truly hated that processed Yamaha sound so much i went for Kawai and Nord.
The CP300 and the Motif line didnīt convince me either.
I played the CP1 on numerous occasions and i still suffered from the bad P120 imprintings in my system.....couldnīt warm for it at all !
I kinda liked the CP4 at Namm, but the keys felt neither pleasently light as the CP1 or firm as the Kawai renderings.
Quote:

I see. Well I'm actually a piano player - for almost 50 years. 35 of those years I've been fortunate enough to practice on 3 top quality grands daily - Yamaha C7E, Yamaha S6 and Steinway D. If you add up the thousands of practice hours I've logged at home, plus the time in recording studios , concerts, clubs and casuals on every conceivable brand and model of piano (ranging from great to brutal) - basically I feel I have a pretty good understanding of what sounds and plays good. Most certainly I know what I like and don't like.

I know you do ! I have tuned 15 or more pianoīs each week the last 28 years, adjusted, intonated and regulated countless of concert grand pianoīs....so i call it a draw.....hahaha, i just wanted to point out that i like Nord very much and that opinion comes from someone who doesnīt feel the same as you do about Nord, but has equall credentials when it comes to pianoīs in general.
BTW Kawai James and the Kawai crew heard me play at the Messe 2016 on their digital grand and multiple Onkyo amps and i he told me he was surprised and impressed ....not to boast or anything, but i am a serious pianist all my life too !! I was intrigued by the piano so much that i went to a piano technicianīs school besides being a pianist. For a daily living a became a pianotuner and i played once a week as a pianist at mostly private parties of the rich.
I also played in bands the last 10 years.

Anyways ,....sorry to derail this topic about the RD2000, but i have read your appreciation towards Yamaha over the years, always liked your input, but Nord has given me so much pleasure that i couldnīt resist to counter your somewhat negative comments about the Nord.

Top
#2833417 - 02/04/17 06:30 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: vanderSchoot]
Polkahero Offline
KCFF League Champ '15
Platinum Member

Registered: 05/07/10
Posts: 1174
Loc: Michigan
Can one really generalize piano actions of specific makers? I've played plenty of Kawai grands that were really heavy, but I've also played some that had probably the lightest action I've ever tried on a grand piano. Same with Steinway, we have a 6 foot grand at school that takes extra force to play whereas the 9 foot concert grand in the recital hall is fairly light. Both pianos were refurbished in recent years.

What bothers me with some of these digital stage piano actions isn't the heaviness of the keys but rather how the keys bounce back after being released. My Kawai MP7 is pretty sluggish in that regard but I manage to work around it. Fast repeated notes/chords is not its forte. A good concert grand key snaps right back. What digital piano actions are out there that perform likewise? I didn't think the CP4 was much better than my Kawai when I tried it out a couple of years ago.
_________________________
'57 Hammond B-3, '60 Hammond A100, '64 Leslie 251, '77 Leslie 330, '80 Leslie 770, '64 Hammond PR-40
Trek II UC-1A
Hammond SK1 + HX3 organ module
Kawai MP7
Alesis QSR





Top
#2833420 - 02/04/17 06:57 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Polkahero]
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club

Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 11109
Originally Posted By: Polkahero
What bothers me with some of these digital stage piano actions isn't the heaviness of the keys but rather how the keys bounce back after being released. My Kawai MP7 is pretty sluggish in that regard but I manage to work around it. Fast repeated notes/chords is not its forte. A good concert grand key snaps right back. What digital piano actions are out there that perform likewise? I didn't think the CP4 was much better than my Kawai when I tried it out a couple of years ago.

In my experience, the Kawai MP7 is one of the *better* keyboards in this respect! Maybe not as responsive as a good grand, but better than the Yamaha GH boards, the current Privias, the Roland FA-08 and similar (which I think includes FP50, RD64 and probably DS88), probably Korg RH3 and definitely whatever it is they put in the Kross, the numerous TP100 based boards (i.e. some Nords and Kurzweils) and Kawai's own MP10, at least. The Fatar TP40 in the better Nords and Kurzweils are relatively quick, though they are less than ideal piano actions in other ways (though I haven't played the newest version in the NP3). The only other boards I've played that come to mind that might be quicker than the MP7 are the Yamaha action from the CP1/CP5 (not currently used in any board, AFAIK), and some of Rolands (like the FP7, FP7F, I think FP80). All of which are/were pricier and heavier to lug around than the MP7, I think.
_________________________
Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!

Top
#2833427 - 02/04/17 07:10 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: AnotherScott]
Polkahero Offline
KCFF League Champ '15
Platinum Member

Registered: 05/07/10
Posts: 1174
Loc: Michigan
Interesting, Scott. I'll have to try out my friend's CP1 the next time I'm at his place and see how it compares to my Kawai. I guess I'm spoiled from playing on nice grand pianos for many years!
_________________________
'57 Hammond B-3, '60 Hammond A100, '64 Leslie 251, '77 Leslie 330, '80 Leslie 770, '64 Hammond PR-40
Trek II UC-1A
Hammond SK1 + HX3 organ module
Kawai MP7
Alesis QSR





Top
#2833434 - 02/04/17 07:56 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: AnotherScott]
Al Coda Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 08/31/08
Posts: 3899
Loc: out in the sticks
Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... The Fatar TP40 in the better Nords and Kurzweils are relatively quick,


Well, TP-40L in Kurz and TP-40M in Nord Stage2ex are designed to be compromize actions allowing MIDI channel AFTERTOUCH.

Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... though they are less than ideal piano actions in other ways ...


Yes.

Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... (though I haven't played the newest version in the NP3).


Different story īcause thatīs Fatarīs top action NOT offering MIDI channel AFTERTOUCH (I donīt find support of AT in the specs) for the NORD Piano 3.

It WILL feel different because itīs a GRADED weighted hammer action and the others above arenīt.
Also,- the others above are dual-sensor actions only !

I doubt weīll see any keyboard action feeling like a real grand (which one please ?) in a electronic and/or digital instument at all.
Itīs not really necessary IMO since up to now it does nothing more than triggering samples or more or less perfect virtual piano models.
The triple sensor technology, when done right and improving repetitions, is some advantage IMO.

A.C.

Top
#2833435 - 02/04/17 08:10 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Al Coda]
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club

Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 11109
Originally Posted By: Al Coda
Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... (though I haven't played the newest version in the NP3).


Different story īcause thatīs Fatarīs top action NOT offering MIDI channel AFTERTOUCH (I donīt find support of AT in the specs) for the NORD Piano 3.

Correct. Though also, the earlier Nord Pianos (with other TP40 variants) didn't support aftertouch either, IIRC.

One thing I"m curious about in regards to the new (3-sensor) model is whether it responds any better to a thumbnail gliss, which did not work well on the older ones.
_________________________
Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!

Top
#2834611 - 02/09/17 10:57 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: AnotherScott]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29
Here is the complete listing of the RD-2000 V-Piano parameters:
TONE COLOR
LID
STRING RESONANCE
DAMPER RESONANCE
HAMMER NOISE
DUPLEX SCALE
KEY OFF RESONANCE
CABINET RESONANCE
SOUNDBOARD RESONATOR
DAMPER NOISE
KEY OFF NOISE

Here is the list of the V-Piano and V-Piano parameters:
SOUND LIFT
SOFT PEDAL SENSE
STRING RESONANCE
DAMPER RESONANCE
SOUNDBOARD RESONANCE
KEY OFF RESONANCE
UNISON TUNE
STRETCH TUNE
HAMMER HARDNESS
CROSS RESONANCE
DECAY TIME
TONE COLOR
DAMPING TIME
DAMPER NOISE LEVEL

Here is a list of the HP603, HP605, LX7 and LX17 parameters (Sound designer):
Lid 0–6
Key Off Noise Off, 1–10
Hammer Noise -2–0–2
Duplex Scale Off, 1–10
Full Scale String Res. Off, 1–10
Damper Resonance Off, 1–10
Key Off Resonance Off, 1–10
Cabinet Resonance Off, 1–10
Soundboard Type 1–5
Damper Noise Off, 1–10


You will not be able to use RD-2000 settings in the HP, LX or V-Pianos.
The individual string settings are not on these lists.

Top
#2834653 - 02/09/17 01:10 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Al Coda]
Bachus Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 05/14/15
Posts: 437
Originally Posted By: Al Coda
Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... The Fatar TP40 in the better Nords and Kurzweils are relatively quick,


Well, TP-40L in Kurz and TP-40M in Nord Stage2ex are designed to be compromize actions allowing MIDI channel AFTERTOUCH.

Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... though they are less than ideal piano actions in other ways ...


Yes.

Originally Posted By: AnotherScott

... (though I haven't played the newest version in the NP3).


Different story īcause thatīs Fatarīs top action NOT offering MIDI channel AFTERTOUCH (I donīt find support of AT in the specs) for the NORD Piano 3.

It WILL feel different because itīs a GRADED weighted hammer action and the others above arenīt.
Also,- the others above are dual-sensor actions only !

I doubt weīll see any keyboard action feeling like a real grand (which one please ?) in a electronic and/or digital instument at all.
Itīs not really necessary IMO since up to now it does nothing more than triggering samples or more or less perfect virtual piano models.
The triple sensor technology, when done right and improving repetitions, is some advantage IMO.

A.C.


Fatar has aftertouch for all their actions, even the latest and greatest piano actions.. its just an option/choice for manufactorers to add them..


Studiologic SL88 grand has that top knotch triple sensor action thats also in the nord piano 3 and combined it with aftertouch...
_________________________
Korg Kronos 88, Yamaha Tyros5 (76), Integra 7, macbook pro/mainstage

Top
#2836972 - 02/20/17 09:15 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Bachus]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29

Top
#2839169 - 03/02/17 12:28 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
Marko in Boston Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 01/03/14
Posts: 98
Roland just posted manuals and drivers for RD-2000:

https://www.roland.com/global/support/by_product/rd-2000/
_________________________
KAWAI ES7 | ROLAND RD-800 | YAMAHA CP4 | YAMAHA STAGEPAS 400i | PRESONUS R65 & T10 | SHURE SRH1540 | SENNHEISER HD650 | K&M OMEGA

Top
#2839397 - 03/03/17 09:26 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Dave Ferris]
jimkost2002 Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 735
Loc: Brooklyn, NY
Dave, your review of the RD makes me think I will pull the trigger on this.
I've never had much love for Roland APs except for the V-piano, which I LOVE.
If this approaches that level of sound and playability, I'm there!
I also need master controller options that the CP4 doesn't have and the other routing options are most attractive.
Plus, metal is way better than plastic!
_________________________
"I have constantly tried to deliver only products which withstand the closest scrutiny – products which prove themselves superior in every respect.”
Robert Bosch, 1919

Top
#2839434 - 03/03/17 11:54 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: jimkost2002]
Dave Ferris Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 03/05/07
Posts: 5505
Loc: Glendale, Ca.
You should play it for yourself before you pull the trigger on one. Don't go on what I say. smile

Again I had only 20 minutes but it felt / sounded good enough to say I'd buy it just for the one piano and action alone. But that would be for home.

I'm done hauling 48 lb. boards + the weight of the case. Plus tight set up spaces are more the norm today then ever ! Lately I've had a few instances where even the CP4 has been a tight fit. I can't imagine using the Roland , even though it's only a few inches wider, on a lot of these gigs.


Edited by Dave Ferris (03/03/17 05:25 PM)
_________________________
https://soundcloud.com/dave-ferris

2005 NY Steinway D
Yamaha CP4, CP5

Top
#2839577 - 03/04/17 08:17 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Dave Ferris]
jimkost2002 Offline
Gold Member

Registered: 02/05/08
Posts: 735
Loc: Brooklyn, NY
Dave, it seems like you and I have very similar AP/DP requirements and your earlier CP4 advice was on the money.

Plus, I'm looking at this for a pratice/studio to do double duty as an AP engine and master controller.

I was intrigued by the Korg Grandstagr, but that sluggish RH3 action is a deal breaker.....
_________________________
"I have constantly tried to deliver only products which withstand the closest scrutiny – products which prove themselves superior in every respect.”
Robert Bosch, 1919

Top
#2839585 - 03/04/17 08:38 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: jimkost2002]
Spotting Jonah Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 07/18/13
Posts: 82
Loc: Northern California
Originally Posted By: jimkost2002
that sluggish RH3 action is a deal breaker.....


That's a great way to describe it - "sluggish". Having an RD-800 and a Kronos2 73 next to each other in my studio, that is exactly how the Korg feels. Anytime I want to just "play" I always fire up the RD... it just feels awesome, especially compared to the Kronos.

As for the RD-2000, I already have my name on one. It does everything I wish the RD-800 did, and then some. I did hear that the difference between the PHA4 and PHA50 keys is noticeable. Not necessarily better... just different.
_________________________
~ That guy

Top
#2839597 - 03/04/17 09:40 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: Spotting Jonah]
AnotherScott Offline
10k Club

Registered: 10/19/09
Posts: 11109
Originally Posted By: jimkost2002
I was intrigued by the Korg Grandstagr, but that sluggish RH3 action is a deal breaker.....
Originally Posted By: Spotting Jonah
That's a great way to describe it - "sluggish". Having an RD-800 and a Kronos2 73 next to each other in my studio, that is exactly how the Korg feels.

While the RH3 in my SV1 is not the "quickest" feeling hammer action I've played, it's not the most sluggish either, and even though I prefer lighter feeling actions in general, I find I really enjoy playing the SV1. I haven't played the RH3 version of the Kronos, and I wonder if it feels different in that board, whether by virtue of the addition of the aftertouch (which the Grandstage would not have), or just that mysterious thing where some boards seem to have sounds that "connect" better to the keys. Or maybe a matter of unit-to-unit variation (and we do know that there have been some slightly different versions of the RH3 over the years).
_________________________
Maybe this is the best place for a shameless plug! Our new video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZRC3b4p4EI is a 40 minute adaptation of T. S. Eliot's "Prufrock" - check it out!

Top
#2839634 - 03/04/17 12:06 PM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: AnotherScott]
ElmerJFudd Offline
MP Hall of Fame Member

Registered: 11/30/14
Posts: 5273
Loc: USA, greater NY area
Remember the days when the rack was imminent? ie. Motif ES Rack, or the JV/XV, or surprise of the season Integra-7. Would love to see a Kronos rack or desktop to use with the action of our choice. On a side note, some whining about the DM-12 action too... curious how quickly they'll release the desktop.
_________________________
Live: Yamaha S90ES, Roland VR-700
Home: Rebuilt 1910 Chickering 5'2", Fender Rhodes MKI 88k

Top
#2839994 - 03/06/17 10:21 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: ElmerJFudd]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29
Roland RD-2000 preset #1 Stage Grand. Sounds good.

Roland RD-2000 Demo #1 by Andrea Girbaudo

Top
#2839996 - 03/06/17 10:28 AM Re: Roland RD-2000 [Re: brooster1]
brooster1 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/09/16
Posts: 29

Top
Page 4 of 8 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >


Moderator:  Grave Bryce, Stephen Fortner