Actually, I've been dreaming of something like this for a long time, and started a few disussions on this forum. Of course, it would be worth to learn an entirely new system *only* if a consistent part of the music community would agree to do the same. But I'd love to have one, if only for my own amusement. Can you imagine? All scales and arpeggios with the same fingering! Transposing? A breeze. Large leaps, generally much easier. Of course, it remains to be seen how well this particular brand of keyboard responds to one's touch, and how much it costs. From the pictures, looks like an elegant implementation, btw.
Well... Maybee you think the QWERTY system is logical as well?
To me this is very interesting. I like logical stuff. Franz Liszt said "This invention will have replaced the present piano keyboard in fifty years' time!".
Well... Maybee you think the QWERTY system is logical as well?
Yes, the QWERTY keyboard is very logical, as it distributes the letters placing the most used letters in the most ergonomic spots...in ENGLISH. In other languages the qwerty keyboard is absolutely ilogical, but we still use it instead of some weird keyboard designs because it's not worth the PITA of learning how to use a different keyboard.
That's probably why the daskin design failed more than 100 years ago, and I don't really see how it can overcome this essential flaw today
Liszt was an amazing musician and piano player, but he's not remembered for his clever vision on engineering, is he?
I will stick to the good ole'-non user-friendly in terms of transposing-88 keys linear keyboard. I kinda love it the way it is
PS BTW, I saw once a guitar with a curved neck, more ergonomic and easier to learn and play than regular guitars, but I've never seen that kind of weird thing ever played by anyone...
That's probably why the daskin design failed more than 100 years ago, and I don't really see how it can overcome this essential flaw today
Liszt was an amazing musician and piano player, but he's not remembered for his clever vision on engineering, is he?
I don't think any of that is why it failed. I think it has to do with human nature and history. My Esperanto comparison was only half-joking: it's hard to start a new language after a millennium or so of the old one. The same with the keyboard: who is going to teach that?
When I ( and a bunch of us 40-something Americans here) was in grade school, there was the big push: The US was switching to the metric system. Waiting...waiting.... Didn't happen, they couldn't convince Americans to change their ways, not matter what advantages there were.
As so far musical instruments makers cannot produce decent midi piano controller so let's allow them first to accomplish that before we switch to something as radical and silly like this.
BTW, I saw once a guitar with a curved neck, more ergonomic and easier to learn and play than regular guitars, but I've never seen that kind of weird thing ever played by anyone...
Almost all modern guitars have some degree of curvature. Though it has its trade offs. Smaller radius necks are easier to bar chord, the trade off being string bending is more difficult. The preferences of neck radius (straight or compound), fret gauge/height, string height are as personal a preference as keyboard action or boxers/briefs. All necks are slightly bowed upward for string relief and aids in getting tuning 'agreement' up the neck. No guitar is perfectly tuned, many devices have been used to compensate at the nut or bridge, one builder uses compensated frets that are difficult to get used to, and look terrible like squiggly lines, but it has its fans. But again nearly every single modern guitar made has a curved radius between 9.5" - 20" and some are compound radius. The compound was radius was very expensive until the invention of computer controlled lathes and C&C machines.
Oh no, the one I was referring to was a prototype of a really curved guitar. The neck was curved and twisted -curved as a bow backwards, and the fret side was also twisted from frontal to an upper angle position close to the tuners, let's say. Really strange instrument.
Allegedly this helped the hand, wrist and elbow to make more natural moves, I was looking for a picture of it, but no luck so far!
Regarding the QWERTY keyboard, I heard that this was developed as a less efficient layout, in order to slow down super fast typists, because early typewriters could not cope, and jammed regularly at high typing speeds. Perhaps this is an urban myth...
No, that is the truth. Speed typists prefer the Dvorak layout, which places the most commonly used keys immediately under the fingers.
QWERTY was designed so that the typewriter hammers for common 2 letter combinations were not physically adjacent, and could have time to retract before another one jammed it. It had the practical effect of slowing down typists.
I once watched a Letterman show where a guest was the world champion speed typist. He put her to the test and all that came out was gibberish. Turns out she uses a Dvorak kbd and neglected to tell anyone at the show. Oops.
Okay that picture explains it. While I believe that would work well on a large scale such as the bass, I would have to play one to really judge on a guitar. The problems I see are: 1) Bending, seems to me a string would fret out if bent too far. 2) Action, the string height on most electric guitars is really, really low. I don't see how you maintain a string height less than 1mm above each fret.
Guitarists especially the young ones aren't afraid to experiment. You have all types of guitars floating around. Some have odd numbers of strings, I've seen 11 and twenty string variations. Some with drone strings some only meant for two handed tapping. That is just the type of bass our bassist would use he has several like this:
His are 5 strings though.
Last edited by Toano88; 10/11/1103:33 PM.
Boards: Kurzweil SP-6, Roland FA-08, VR-09, DeepMind 12 Modules: Korg Radias, Roland D-05, Bk7-m & Sonic Cell
Can't you see the beauty with this keyboard layout?
no I can't.
Ok.
Originally Posted By: offnote
Originally Posted By: omnipoly
Imagine the same fingering for every key!
making years of practicing in different scales useless? no, thank you.
Nobody said you have to stop playing "ordinary" pianos. With that logic you can't learn any new instrument, language etc.
Alright, so we're old dogs who put years in tedious fingerings and scales, but I would definitely give a "janko" to my child. By the way, I don't think all would be in vain. I think one could adapt quite easily.
Originally Posted By: offnote
p.s. How about the touch and feel of the ivory key on real acoustic piano?
I'd buy it if I had the money. Several people on the viola mailing list back in the day gave it high marks for ergonomics - the ones who have actually held one in their hands and played it, instead of just looking at a picture.
I realize this is the Keyboard Corner... but I play a harp based on the chromatic keyboard system, the cross strung chromatic harp. (See wikipedia for fuller information.)
A variation of cross stringing for a WHOLE TONE harp system was devised for harp. It was inspired by the Janko system. I've been studying and playing this system for several years now. It definitely feels intuitive and more kinesthetic. It is most definitely isomorphic.
All this to say, I am absolutely fascinated with the Janko system and am looking forward to playing a Janko keyboard system whether Daskin, Chromatone, or homebuilt.
Players I've written to claim it is a wonderful system to work with [From my experience, I'm guessing with some time behind it.]
I'm wishing there was a group somewhere, yahoo, MusicPlayer or elsewhere where players actually talked about their experiences. Most of the players of this format are in Japan.
If you ever hear of such a group. Let me know.
Best regards,
O Kn
"The laws of paradox have largely been forgotten."
I like the Daskin version used in the video because it has a bit more room for the fingers verses the chromatone. Unlike the uniform keyboard, it is a full Janko type system so it has greater fingering options. Unlike the Bluthner/ Haessler custom Janko grand acoustic piano, which can be special ordered, the Daskin is multiple of thousands dollars less. Still, any of these Janko inspired (or arranged) offshoots would be well worth having and playing on.
There is a Bluthner store in Lansing... I keep hoping, by accident they get a Janko formatted grand shipped to them and don't know what to do with it and by miracle I can study on it.
"The laws of paradox have largely been forgotten."
string instruments, like this thing:
